» Articles » PMID: 37754944

Automatic 3D Postoperative Evaluation of Complex Orthopaedic Interventions

Overview
Journal J Imaging
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 Sep 27
PMID 37754944
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In clinical practice, image-based postoperative evaluation is still performed without state-of-the-art computer methods, as these are not sufficiently automated. In this study we propose a fully automatic 3D postoperative outcome quantification method for the relevant steps of orthopaedic interventions on the example of Periacetabular Osteotomy of Ganz (PAO). A typical orthopaedic intervention involves cutting bone, anatomy manipulation and repositioning as well as implant placement. Our method includes a segmentation based deep learning approach for detection and quantification of the cuts. Furthermore, anatomy repositioning was quantified through a multi-step registration method, which entailed a coarse alignment of the pre- and postoperative CT images followed by a fine fragment alignment of the repositioned anatomy. Implant (i.e., screw) position was identified by 3D Hough transform for line detection combined with fast voxel traversal based on ray tracing. The feasibility of our approach was investigated on 27 interventions and compared against manually performed 3D outcome evaluations. The results show that our method can accurately assess the quality and accuracy of the surgery. Our evaluation of the fragment repositioning showed a cumulative error for the coarse and fine alignment of 2.1 mm. Our evaluation of screw placement accuracy resulted in a distance error of 1.32 mm for screw head location and an angular deviation of 1.1° for screw axis. As a next step we will explore generalisation capabilities by applying the method to different interventions.

References
1.
Sharma N, Aggarwal L . Automated medical image segmentation techniques. J Med Phys. 2010; 35(1):3-14. PMC: 2825001. DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.58777. View

2.
Adams M, Chen W, Holcdorf D, McCusker M, Howe P, Gaillard F . Computer vs human: Deep learning versus perceptual training for the detection of neck of femur fractures. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018; 63(1):27-32. DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12828. View

3.
Hirsiger S, Schweizer A, Miyake J, Nagy L, Furnstahl P . Corrective Osteotomies of Phalangeal and Metacarpal Malunions Using Patient-Specific Guides: CT-Based Evaluation of the Reduction Accuracy. Hand (N Y). 2017; 13(6):627-636. PMC: 6300182. DOI: 10.1177/1558944717726135. View

4.
Munier M, Donnez M, Ollivier M, Flecher X, Chabrand P, Argenson J . Can three-dimensional patient-specific cutting guides be used to achieve optimal correction for high tibial osteotomy? Pilot study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017; 103(2):245-250. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.020. View

5.
Brett A, Miller C, Hayes C, Krasnow J, Ozanian T, Abrams K . Development of a clinical workflow tool to enhance the detection of vertebral fractures: accuracy and precision evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(22):2437-43. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b2eb69. View