» Articles » PMID: 30407743

Computer Vs Human: Deep Learning Versus Perceptual Training for the Detection of Neck of Femur Fractures

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2018 Nov 9
PMID 30407743
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate the accuracy of deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) for detecting neck of femur (NoF) fractures on radiographs, in comparison with perceptual training in medically-naïve individuals.

Methods: This study extends a previous study that conducted perceptual training in medically-naïve individuals for the detection of NoF fractures on a variety of dataset sizes. The same anteroposterior hip radiograph dataset was used to train two DCNNs (AlexNet and GoogLeNet) to detect NoF fractures. For direct comparison with perceptual training results, deep learning was completed across a variety of dataset sizes (200, 320 and 640 images) with images split into training (80%) and validation (20%). An additional 160 images were used as the final test set. Multiple pre-processing and augmentation techniques were utilised.

Results: AlexNet and GoogLeNet DCNNs NoF fracture detection accuracy increased with larger training dataset sizes and mildly with augmentation. Accuracy increased from 81.9% and 88.1% to 89.4% and 94.4% for AlexNet and GoogLeNet respectively. Similarly, the test accuracy for the perceptual training in top-performing medically-naïve individuals increased from 87.6% to 90.5% when trained on 640 images compared with 200 images.

Conclusions: Single detection tasks in radiology are commonly used in DCNN research with their results often used to make broader claims about machine learning being able to perform as well as subspecialty radiologists. This study suggests that as impressive as recognising fractures is for a DCNN, similar learning can be achieved by top-performing medically-naïve humans with less than 1 hour of perceptual training.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic performance of neural network algorithms in skull fracture detection on CT scans: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sharifi G, Hajibeygi R, Zamani S, Easa A, Bahrami A, Eshraghi R Emerg Radiol. 2024; 32(1):97-111.

PMID: 39680295 DOI: 10.1007/s10140-024-02300-7.


Application and Prospects of Deep Learning Technology in Fracture Diagnosis.

Zhang J, Yang J, Wang X, Wang H, Zhou H, Yan Z Curr Med Sci. 2024; 44(6):1132-1140.

PMID: 39551854 DOI: 10.1007/s11596-024-2928-5.


Artificial Intelligence-Based Applications for Bone Fracture Detection Using Medical Images: A Systematic Review.

Kutbi M Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(17).

PMID: 39272664 PMC: 11394268. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14171879.


AI for detection, classification and prediction of loss of alignment of distal radius fractures; a systematic review.

Oude Nijhuis K, Dankelman L, Wiersma J, Barvelink B, IJpma F, Verhofstad M Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024; 50(6):2819-2831.

PMID: 38981869 PMC: 11666746. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02557-0.


Proximal femur fracture detection on plain radiography via feature pyramid networks.

Yildiz Potter I, Yeritsyan D, Mahar S, Kheir N, Vaziri A, Putman M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):12046.

PMID: 38802519 PMC: 11130146. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63001-2.