» Articles » PMID: 37753868

Engineering Endosomolytic Nanocarriers of Diverse Morphologies Using Confined Impingement Jet Mixing

Overview
Journal Nanoscale
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 Sep 27
PMID 37753868
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The clinical translation of many biomolecular therapeutics has been hindered by undesirable pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, inadequate membrane permeability, poor endosomal escape and cytosolic delivery, and/or susceptibility to degradation. Overcoming these challenges merits the development of nanoscale drug carriers (nanocarriers) to improve the delivery of therapeutic cargo. Herein, we implement a flash nanoprecipitation (FNP) approach to produce nanocarriers of diverse vesicular morphologies by using various molecular weight PEG--DEAEMA--BMA (PEG-DB) polymers. We demonstrated that FNP can produce uniform (PDI < 0.1) particles after 5 impingements, and that by varying the copolymer hydrophilic mass fraction, FNP enables access to a diverse variety of nanoarchitectures including micelles, unilamellar vesicles (polymersomes), and multi-compartment vesicles (MCVs). We synthesized a library of 2 kDa PEG block copolymers, with DEAEMA--BMA second block molecular weights of 3, 6, 12, 15, 20, and 30 kDa. All formulations were both pH responsive, endosomolytic, and capable of loading and cytosolically delivering small negatively charged molecules - albeit to different degrees. Using a B16.F10 melanoma model, we showcased the therapeutic potential of a lead FNP formulated PEG-DB nanocarrier, encapsulating the cyclic dinucleotide (CDN) cGAMP to activate the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway in a therapeutically relevant context. Collectively, these data demonstrate that an FNP process can be used to formulate pH-responsive nanocarriers of diverse morphologies using a PEG-DB polymer system. As FNP is an industrially scalable process, these data address the critical translational challenge of producing PEG-DB nanoparticles at scale. Furthermore, the diverse morphologies produced may specialize in the delivery of distinct biomolecular cargos for other therapeutic applications, implicating the therapeutic potential of this platform in an array of disease applications.

Citing Articles

cGAS/STING in skin melanoma: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutics.

Mahin J, Xu X, Li L, Zhang C Cell Commun Signal. 2024; 22(1):553.

PMID: 39558334 PMC: 11571982. DOI: 10.1186/s12964-024-01860-y.


A Cancer Nanovaccine for Co-Delivery of Peptide Neoantigens and Optimized Combinations of STING and TLR4 Agonists.

Baljon J, Kwiatkowski A, Pagendarm H, Stone P, Kumar A, Bharti V ACS Nano. 2024; 18(9):6845-6862.

PMID: 38386282 PMC: 10919087. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.3c04471.

References
1.
Foroozandeh P, Abdul Aziz A . Insight into Cellular Uptake and Intracellular Trafficking of Nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2018; 13(1):339. PMC: 6202307. DOI: 10.1186/s11671-018-2728-6. View

2.
Baljon J, Dandy A, Wang-Bishop L, Wehbe M, Jacobson M, Wilson J . The efficiency of cytosolic drug delivery using pH-responsive endosomolytic polymers does not correlate with activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Biomater Sci. 2019; 7(5):1888-1897. PMC: 6478565. DOI: 10.1039/c8bm01643g. View

3.
Wehbe M, Wang-Bishop L, Becker K, Shae D, Baljon J, He X . Nanoparticle delivery improves the pharmacokinetic properties of cyclic dinucleotide STING agonists to open a therapeutic window for intravenous administration. J Control Release. 2020; 330:1118-1129. PMC: 9008741. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.11.017. View

4.
Corrales L, McWhirter S, Dubensky Jr T, Gajewski T . The host STING pathway at the interface of cancer and immunity. J Clin Invest. 2016; 126(7):2404-11. PMC: 4922692. DOI: 10.1172/JCI86892. View

5.
Stano A, Scott E, Dane K, Swartz M, Hubbell J . Tunable T cell immunity towards a protein antigen using polymersomes vs. solid-core nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2013; 34(17):4339-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.024. View