Comparison of Dental Flosses - an Investigation of Subjective Preference and Mechanical Properties

Overview

Journal Biomater Investig Dent

Date 2023 Sep 27

PMID 37753304

Authors

Zhongjin Huang

Jonathan M Broadbent

Joanne Jung Eun Choi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the properties (tensile strength, roughness, abrasiveness) of different dental flosses and how these properties relate to subjective preference for floss by users.

Materials And Method: Four flosses of differing compositions were selected (polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), nylon, silk, and ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE)). Tensile strength (TS) was measured utilising a universal testing machine (total = 40). Surface roughness (Ra) was measured on 3D reconstructed models of scanning electron microscope and abrasiveness was measured through block-on-ring tests against human enamel. Subjective preference for floss was measured by asking a sample of 16 individuals to use each floss for an 8-day period using a split-mouth design.

Results: The highest TS was found in UHMWPE floss (194.1824.61 MPa) while the lowest TS was found in PTFE floss (11.780.77 MPa). Silk floss had the highest Ra (0.3040.025 m) while PTFE floss had the lowest (0.0480.003 m). In-vitro abrasion testing of the flosses identified no significant differences between the flosses in causing wear on tooth enamel. Subjective ratings of flosses indicated PTFE floss to be most preferred and nylon floss to be least preferred.

Conclusion: There was a difference in subjective preference between dental flosses composed of different materials. The PTFE floss was the overall most preferred while the nylon floss was the least preferred. There was also an association between the mechanical properties and preference for their usage, with PTFE floss being the most preferred but having the lowest surface roughness and tensile strength.

Clinical Relevance: This study compared a wide range of mechanical properties and subject preferences of commercially available dental floss. The results of this study can provide guidance for the recommendation of dental floss for oral hygiene routines.

References

Crews K, OHara J, Gordy F, Penton N . The Bass technique: Charles Cassidy Bass' legacy. Miss Dent Assoc J. 1995; 51(2):18-20. View

Hanes P, ODell N, Baker M, Keagle J, Davis H . The effect of tensile strength on the clinical effectiveness and patient acceptance of dental floss. J Clin Periodontol. 1992; 19(1):30-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1992.tb01145.x. View

Chun K, Choi H, Lee J . Comparison of mechanical property and role between enamel and dentin in the human teeth. J Dent Biomech. 2014; 5:1758736014520809. PMC: 3924884. DOI: 10.1177/1758736014520809. View

Stavrakis A, Kojic S, Petrovic B, Neskovic I, Stojanovic G . Performance Evaluation of Dental Flosses Pre- and Post-Utilization. Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(4). PMC: 8879268. DOI: 10.3390/ma15041522. View

Dorfer C, Wundrich D, Staehle H, Pioch T . Gliding capacity of different dental flosses. J Periodontol. 2001; 72(5):672-8. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.5.672. View

Bass C . An effective method of personal oral hygiene; part II. J La State Med Soc. 1954; 106(3):100-12. View

Dayyoub T, Maksimkin A, Kaloshkin S, Kolesnikov E, Chukov D, Dyachkova T . The Structure and Mechanical Properties of the UHMWPE Films Modified by the Mixture of Graphene Nanoplates with Polyaniline. Polymers (Basel). 2019; 11(1). PMC: 6401693. DOI: 10.3390/polym11010023. View

Boronow K, Brody J, Schaider L, Peaslee G, Havas L, Cohn B . Serum concentrations of PFASs and exposure-related behaviors in African American and non-Hispanic white women. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2019; 29(2):206-217. PMC: 6380931. DOI: 10.1038/s41370-018-0109-y. View

Beaumont R . Patient preference for waxed or unwaxed dental floss. J Periodontol. 1990; 61(2):123-5. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1990.61.2.123. View

10.

Wiegand A, Kuhn M, Sener B, Roos M, Attin T . Abrasion of eroded dentin caused by toothpaste slurries of different abrasivity and toothbrushes of different filament diameter. J Dent. 2009; 37(6):480-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.03.005. View

11.

Bass C . The optimum characteristics of dental floss for personal oral hygiene. Dent Items Interest. 1948; 70(9):921-34. View