» Articles » PMID: 24550998

Comparison of Mechanical Property and Role Between Enamel and Dentin in the Human Teeth

Overview
Journal J Dent Biomech
Date 2014 Feb 20
PMID 24550998
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The mechanical properties of enamel and dentin were studied using test specimens having the same shape and dimensions because these properties might vary with the experimental conditions and specimen shapes and dimensions. Healthy human teeth were used as specimens for mechanical tests. The stress (MPa), strain (%), and elastic modulus (E, MPa) of the specimens were obtained from compression tests. The maximum stresses of the enamel, dentin, and enamel-dentin specimens were 62.2 ± 23.8, 193.7 ± 30.6, and 126.1 ± 54.6 MPa, respectively. The maximum strains of the enamel, dentin, and enamel-dentin specimens were 4.5 ± 0.8%, 11.9 ± 0.1%, and 8.7 ± 2.7%, respectively. The elastic moduli of the enamel, dentin, and enamel-dentin specimens were 1338.2 ± 307.9, 1653.7 ± 277.9, and 1628.6 ± 482.7 MPa, respectively. The measured hardness value of enamel specimens (HV = 274.8 ± 18.1) was around 4.2 times higher than that of dentin specimens (HV = 65.6 ± 3.9). Judging from the measured values of the stress and strain of enamel specimens, enamel tended to fracture earlier than dentin; therefore, it was considered more brittle than dentin. However, judging from the measured hardness values, enamel was considered harder than dentin. Therefore, enamel has higher wear resistance, making it suitable for grinding and crushing foods, and dentin has higher force resistance, making it suitable for absorbing bite forces. The different mechanical roles of enamel and dentin may arise from their different compositions and internal structures, as revealed through scanning electron micrographs of enamel and dentin.

Citing Articles

Mechanical properties of modern restorative "bioactive" dental materials - an in vitro study.

Radwanski M, Zmyslowska-Polakowska E, Osica K, Krasowski M, Sauro S, Hardan L Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3552.

PMID: 39875486 PMC: 11775110. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86595-7.


Evaluation of the Tribological Behavior of Materials Used for the Production of Orthodontic Devices in 3D DLP Printing Technology, Due to Oral Cavity Environmental Factors.

Snarski-Adamski A, Pieniak D, Krzysiak Z, Firlej M, Brumercik F Materials (Basel). 2025; 18(2).

PMID: 39859772 PMC: 11767099. DOI: 10.3390/ma18020301.


Relative abrasive potential of silica-based conventional and tablet dentifrices on enamel and dentin.

Kasi S, Pilecco R, Rosa L, Tribst J, Kleverlaan C, Ozcan M PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0313637.

PMID: 39739722 PMC: 11687757. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313637.


Compression Behavior of Dental Flowable Composites-Digital Image Correlation and Numerical Analysis.

Chojnacka-Brozek A, Liber-Knec A, Lagan S Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(23).

PMID: 39685289 PMC: 11643310. DOI: 10.3390/ma17235853.


Three-dimensional finite element analysis of occlusal stress on maxillary first molars with different marginal morphologies restored with occlusal veneers.

Chen Q, Luo S, Wang Y, Chen Z, Li Y, Meng M BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1349.

PMID: 39506742 PMC: 11542308. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05121-9.


References
1.
Jantarat J, Palamara J, Lindner C, Messer H . Time-dependent properties of human root dentin. Dent Mater. 2002; 18(6):486-93. DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(01)00074-4. View

2.
HAINES D . Physical properties of human tooth enamel and enamel sheath material under load. J Biomech. 1968; 1(2):117-25. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(68)90014-6. View

3.
Arcis R, Toledano M, Osorio E, Murtra J, Fanovich M, Pascual C . Mechanical properties of visible light-cured resins reinforced with hydroxyapatite for dental restoration. Dent Mater. 2001; 18(1):49-57. DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(01)00019-7. View

4.
Tillberg A, Jarvholm B, Berglund A . Risks with dental materials. Dent Mater. 2008; 24(7):940-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.009. View

5.
Senawongse P, Otsuki M, Tagami J, Mjor I . Age-related changes in hardness and modulus of elasticity of dentine. Arch Oral Biol. 2006; 51(6):457-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2005.11.006. View