Comparison of Mechanical Property and Role Between Enamel and Dentin in the Human Teeth
Overview
Affiliations
The mechanical properties of enamel and dentin were studied using test specimens having the same shape and dimensions because these properties might vary with the experimental conditions and specimen shapes and dimensions. Healthy human teeth were used as specimens for mechanical tests. The stress (MPa), strain (%), and elastic modulus (E, MPa) of the specimens were obtained from compression tests. The maximum stresses of the enamel, dentin, and enamel-dentin specimens were 62.2 ± 23.8, 193.7 ± 30.6, and 126.1 ± 54.6 MPa, respectively. The maximum strains of the enamel, dentin, and enamel-dentin specimens were 4.5 ± 0.8%, 11.9 ± 0.1%, and 8.7 ± 2.7%, respectively. The elastic moduli of the enamel, dentin, and enamel-dentin specimens were 1338.2 ± 307.9, 1653.7 ± 277.9, and 1628.6 ± 482.7 MPa, respectively. The measured hardness value of enamel specimens (HV = 274.8 ± 18.1) was around 4.2 times higher than that of dentin specimens (HV = 65.6 ± 3.9). Judging from the measured values of the stress and strain of enamel specimens, enamel tended to fracture earlier than dentin; therefore, it was considered more brittle than dentin. However, judging from the measured hardness values, enamel was considered harder than dentin. Therefore, enamel has higher wear resistance, making it suitable for grinding and crushing foods, and dentin has higher force resistance, making it suitable for absorbing bite forces. The different mechanical roles of enamel and dentin may arise from their different compositions and internal structures, as revealed through scanning electron micrographs of enamel and dentin.
Mechanical properties of modern restorative "bioactive" dental materials - an in vitro study.
Radwanski M, Zmyslowska-Polakowska E, Osica K, Krasowski M, Sauro S, Hardan L Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3552.
PMID: 39875486 PMC: 11775110. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86595-7.
Snarski-Adamski A, Pieniak D, Krzysiak Z, Firlej M, Brumercik F Materials (Basel). 2025; 18(2).
PMID: 39859772 PMC: 11767099. DOI: 10.3390/ma18020301.
Kasi S, Pilecco R, Rosa L, Tribst J, Kleverlaan C, Ozcan M PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0313637.
PMID: 39739722 PMC: 11687757. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313637.
Compression Behavior of Dental Flowable Composites-Digital Image Correlation and Numerical Analysis.
Chojnacka-Brozek A, Liber-Knec A, Lagan S Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(23).
PMID: 39685289 PMC: 11643310. DOI: 10.3390/ma17235853.
Chen Q, Luo S, Wang Y, Chen Z, Li Y, Meng M BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1349.
PMID: 39506742 PMC: 11542308. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05121-9.