» Articles » PMID: 37743926

Bioreactors, Scaffolds and Microcarriers and Meat Production-current Obstacles and Potential Solutions

Abstract

meat production presents a potential viable alternative for meat consumption, which could provide the consumer with a product indistinguishable from the original, with very similar nutritional and culinary values. Indeed, the alternative products currently accessible often lack comparable nutritional value or culinary attributes to their animal-derived counterparts. This creates challenges for their global acceptance, particularly in countries where meat consumption holds cultural significance. However, while cultured meat research has been progressing rapidly in recent years, some significant obstacles still need to be overcome before its possible commercialization. Hence, this review summarizes the most current knowledge regarding the history of cultured meat, the currently used cell sources and methods used for the purpose of meat production, with particular focus on the role of bioreactors, scaffolds and microcarriers in overcoming the current obstacles. The authors put the potential microcarrier and scaffold-based solutions in a context, discussing the ways in which they can impact the way forward for the technology, including the use of considering the potential practical and societal barriers to implementing it as a viable food source worldwide.

Citing Articles

Future protein alternative: recent progress and challenges in cellular agriculture.

Yang D, Kook K, Heo Y, Kim W Food Sci Biotechnol. 2025; 34(2):423-445.

PMID: 39944669 PMC: 11811358. DOI: 10.1007/s10068-024-01798-4.


Exploring Sustainable Future Protein Sources.

Oh Y, Kim H Food Sci Anim Resour. 2025; 45(1):81-108.

PMID: 39840240 PMC: 11743843. DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2024.e111.


Global Insights into Cultured Meat: Uncovering Production Processes, Potential Hazards, Regulatory Frameworks, and Key Challenges-A Scoping Review.

Zandonadi R, Ramos M, Elias F, Guimaraes N Foods. 2025; 14(1).

PMID: 39796419 PMC: 11720233. DOI: 10.3390/foods14010129.


CRISPR-edited, cell-based future-proof meat and seafood to enhance global food security and nutrition.

Chandrababu A, Puthumana J Cytotechnology. 2024; 76(6):619-652.

PMID: 39435422 PMC: 11490478. DOI: 10.1007/s10616-024-00645-y.


A narrative review: 3D bioprinting of cultured muscle meat and seafood products and its potential for the food industry.

Gurel M, Rathod N, Cabrera L, Voyton S, Yeo M, Ozogul F Trends Food Sci Technol. 2024; 152.

PMID: 39309029 PMC: 11412102. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104670.


References
1.
Radtke A, Herbst-Kralovetz M . Culturing and applications of rotating wall vessel bioreactor derived 3D epithelial cell models. J Vis Exp. 2012; (62). PMC: 3567125. DOI: 10.3791/3868. View

2.
Choi K, Yoon J, Kim M, Lee H, Jeong J, Ryu M . Muscle stem cell isolation and in vitro culture for meat production: A methodological review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2021; 20(1):429-457. DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12661. View

3.
Singh A, Kumar V, Singh S, Gupta J, Kumar M, Sarma D . Recent advances in bioengineered scaffold for in vitro meat production. Cell Tissue Res. 2022; 391(2):235-247. PMC: 9758038. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-022-03718-6. View

4.
Bjare U . Serum-free cell culture. Pharmacol Ther. 1992; 53(3):355-74. DOI: 10.1016/0163-7258(92)90056-6. View

5.
Bentzinger C, Wang Y, Rudnicki M . Building muscle: molecular regulation of myogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012; 4(2). PMC: 3281568. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008342. View