» Articles » PMID: 37743455

Impact of F-FDG PET on TNM Staging and Prognosis in Thymic Epithelial Tumors

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Sep 24
PMID 37743455
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Preoperative fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (F-FDG PET) of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) is well known for identifying malignant-grade TETs; however, its predictive power for determining locally advanced tumors, lymph node (LN) metastasis, and prognosis remains unknown.

Patients And Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with resectable TETs who were preoperatively assessed using F-FDG PET from January 2012 to January 2023. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the cutoff value of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) to predict advanced-stage disease. Recurrence/progression-free survival (RFS/PFS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The staging was classified according to the tumor-node-metastasis system.

Results: Our study included 177 patients; 145 (81.9%) had pathological early-stage TET (stage I or II), and 32 (19.1%) had advanced stage (stage III or IV). The area under the curve value for predicting the advanced stage was 0.903, and the cutoff value was 5.6 (sensitivity 81.3%, specificity 84.8%). SUVmax > 5.6 was associated with worse prognosis for RFS/PFS. LN metastasis was preoperatively detected by FDG uptake in 30.8% of patients with pathological LN positivity, whereas LN metastasis was not pathologically detected in patients with SUVmax < 5.9. In patients with advanced-stage TETs, LN recurrence was more frequent in patients who were preoperatively detected by F-FDG PET than those who were not (75.0% versus 7.1%).

Conclusions: F-FDG PET is a potentially valuable tool for predicting advanced stage and poor prognosis of recurrence in patients with TETs. SUVmax can help thoracic surgeons to guide them in selecting appropriate therapeutic strategies for TETs.

Citing Articles

Imaging characteristics of pediatric primary thymic lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma: case reports of four children with a literature review.

Zhu X, Fang Y, Wang X, Hu J, Gu D, Yao Q Front Pediatr. 2025; 13:1494946.

PMID: 40061425 PMC: 11885277. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2025.1494946.

References
1.
Zhang Y, Li Z, Chen Y, Tan L, Zeng Z, Ding J . Induction Strategy for Locally Advanced Thymoma. Front Oncol. 2021; 11:704220. PMC: 8339962. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.704220. View

2.
Kuriyama S, Imai K, Ishiyama K, Takashima S, Atari M, Matsuo T . Using CT to evaluate mediastinal great vein invasion by thymic epithelial tumors: measurement of the interface between the tumor and neighboring structures. Eur Radiol. 2021; 32(3):1891-1901. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08276-z. View

3.
Ruffini E, Rami-Porta R, Huang J, Ahmad U, Appel S, Bille A . The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Thymic Epithelial Tumor Staging Project: Unresolved Issues to be Addressed for the Next Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. J Thorac Oncol. 2022; 17(6):838-851. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.03.005. View

4.
Kim K, Jeong J, Kim S . Diagnostic Test Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for Characterization of Histologic Type of Thymic Epithelial Tumor: A Meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med. 2021; 47(1):36-42. DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000003921. View

5.
Nakagawa K, Takahashi S, Endo M, Ohde Y, Kurihara H, Terauchi T . Can F-FDG PET predict the grade of malignancy in thymic epithelial tumors? An evaluation of only resected tumors. Cancer Manag Res. 2017; 9:761-768. PMC: 5724416. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S146522. View