The More the Better? Effects of L1 Tonal Density and Typology on the Perception of Non-native Tones

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2023 Sep 21

PMID 37733777

Authors

Min Zhu

Fei Chen

Xiaoxiang Chen

Yuxiao Yang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of L1 tonal density and typology on naïve listeners' perception of L2 Cantonese tones and pitch-equivalent pure tones. Native speakers of two canonical tone languages (Vietnamese and Mandarin) and a pitch-accent language (Japanese) with varying degrees of tonal density were recruited as listeners in a discrimination task followed by a perceptual assimilation task. Results implied that Mandarin listeners with a sparser tone inventory exhibited significantly better performance than Vietnamese listeners, suggesting that denser tonality in L1 did not facilitate or even interfere with L2 tone perception. Furthermore, both groups of canonical tone listeners processed pitch contours in a domain-general manner, with comparable performance in the perception of lexical tones and pure tones. However, Japanese listeners of the pitch-accent language perceived pure tones better than lexical tones, showing a domain-specific mechanism. These findings suggest that both L1 tonal density and typology may modulate the perception of non-native tones.

Citing Articles

Reduced Context Effect on Lexical Tone Normalization in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Speech-Specific Mechanism.

Kuang C, Chen F, Yan J, Peng G J Autism Dev Disord. 2025; .

PMID: 40053229 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-025-06775-2.

References

Michaud A . Final consonants and glottalization: new perspectives from Hanoi Vietnamese. Phonetica. 2005; 61(2-3):119-46. DOI: 10.1159/000082560. View

Deutsch D, Dooley K, Henthorn T, Head B . Absolute pitch among students in an American music conservatory: association with tone language fluency. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 125(4):2398-403. DOI: 10.1121/1.3081389. View

Chang Y, Yao Y, Huang B . Effects of linguistic experience on the perception of high-variability non-native tones. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017; 141(2):EL120. DOI: 10.1121/1.4976037. View

Peng G, Zhang C, Zheng H, Minett J, Wang W . The effect of intertalker variations on acoustic-perceptual mapping in Cantonese and Mandarin tone systems. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011; 55(2):579-95. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0025). View

Xu Y, Gandour J, Francis A . Effects of language experience and stimulus complexity on the categorical perception of pitch direction. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006; 120(2):1063-74. DOI: 10.1121/1.2213572. View

Zhang K, Peng G, Li Y, Minett J, Wang W . The Effect of Speech Variability on Tonal Language Speakers' Second Language Lexical Tone Learning. Front Psychol. 2018; 9:1982. PMC: 6206236. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01982. View

Gandour J, Wong D, Hsieh L, Weinzapfel B, Van Lancker D, Hutchins G . A crosslinguistic PET study of tone perception. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000; 12(1):207-22. DOI: 10.1162/089892900561841. View

Zhu M, Chen X, Yang Y . The effects of native prosodic system and segmental context on Cantonese tone perception by Mandarin and Japanese listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2021; 149(6):4214. DOI: 10.1121/10.0005274. View

So C, Best C . Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Lang Speech. 2010; 53(Pt 2):273-93. PMC: 2897724. DOI: 10.1177/0023830909357156. View

10.

Jiang C, Hamm J, Lim V, Kirk I, Yang Y . Processing melodic contour and speech intonation in congenital amusics with Mandarin Chinese. Neuropsychologia. 2010; 48(9):2630-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.009. View

11.

Iverson P, Evans B . Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 126(2):866-77. DOI: 10.1121/1.3148196. View

12.

Francis A, Ciocca V . Stimulus presentation order and the perception of lexical tones in Cantonese. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003; 114(3):1611-21. DOI: 10.1121/1.1603231. View

13.

Liu L, Lai R, Singh L, Kalashnikova M, Wong P, Kasisopa B . The tone atlas of perceptual discriminability and perceptual distance: Four tone languages and five language groups. Brain Lang. 2022; 229:105106. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105106. View

14.

Nan Y, Liu L, Geiser E, Shu H, Gong C, Dong Q . Piano training enhances the neural processing of pitch and improves speech perception in Mandarin-speaking children. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(28):E6630-E6639. PMC: 6048476. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1808412115. View

15.

Hacquard V, Walter M, Marantz A . The effects of inventory on vowel perception in French and Spanish: an MEG study. Brain Lang. 2006; 100(3):295-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.04.009. View

16.

Yang Y, Chen S, Chen F, Ma J . Development of perceptual similarity and discriminability: the perception of Russian phonemes by Chinese learners. Phonetica. 2023; 80(1-2):117-152. DOI: 10.1515/phon-2022-0023. View

17.

Tsukada K, Kondo M . The Perception of Mandarin Lexical Tones by Native Speakers of Burmese. Lang Speech. 2018; 62(4):625-640. DOI: 10.1177/0023830918806550. View

18.

Mok P, Zuo D . The separation between music and speech: evidence from the perception of Cantonese tones. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012; 132(4):2711-20. DOI: 10.1121/1.4747010. View

19.

Chen F, Peng G . Lower-level acoustics underlie higher-level phonological categories in lexical tone perception. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018; 144(3):EL158. DOI: 10.1121/1.5052205. View

20.

Xi J, Zhang L, Shu H, Zhang Y, Li P . Categorical perception of lexical tones in Chinese revealed by mismatch negativity. Neuroscience. 2010; 170(1):223-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.06.077. View