Cross-language Perception of Non-native Tonal Contrasts: Effects of Native Phonological and Phonetic Influences

Overview

Journal Lang Speech

Specialty Otorhinolaryngology

Date 2010 Jun 30

PMID 20583732

Citations 32

Authors

Connie K So

Catherine T Best

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This study examined the perception of the four Mandarin lexical tones by Mandarin-naïve Hong Kong Cantonese, Japanese, and Canadian English listener groups. Their performance on an identification task, following a brief familiarization task, was analyzed in terms of tonal sensitivities (A-prime scores on correct identifications) and tonal errors (confusions). The A-prime results revealed that the English listeners' sensitivity to Tone 4 identifications specifically was significantly lower than that of the other two groups. The analysis of tonal errors revealed that all listener groups showed perceptual confusion of tone pairs with similar phonetic features (T1-T2, T1-T4 and T2-T3 pairs), but not of those with completely dissimilar features (T1-T3, T2-T4, and T3-T4). Language-specific errors were also observed in their performance, which may be explained within the framework of the Perceptual Assimilation Model (PAM: Best, 1995; Best & Tyler, 2007). The findings imply that linguistic experience with native tones does not necessarily facilitate non-native tone perception. Rather, the phonemic status and the phonetic features (similarities or dissimilarities) between the tonal systems of the target language and the listeners' native languages play critical roles in the perception of non-native tones.

Citing Articles

The more the better? Effects of L1 tonal density and typology on the perception of non-native tones.

Zhu M, Chen F, Chen X, Yang Y PLoS One. 2023; 18(9):e0291828.

PMID: 37733777 PMC: 10513246. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291828.

Does Musicality Assist Foreign Language Learning? Perception and Production of Thai Vowels, Consonants and Lexical Tones by Musicians and Non-Musicians.

Gotz A, Liu L, Nash B, Burnham D Brain Sci. 2023; 13(5).

PMID: 37239282 PMC: 10216538. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13050810.

A conceptual model of second language pronunciation in communicative contexts: Implications for children's bilingual education.

Lin Y, Li F, MacLeod A, Pollock K Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1125157.

PMID: 37138974 PMC: 10149927. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1125157.

Tonal properties in a non-tonal language: The case of Indonesian.

Udayana I, Aryawibawa I, Sedeng I, Sereno J Heliyon. 2023; 9(2):e13440.

PMID: 36820034 PMC: 9937940. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13440.

Individual differences in nonnative lexical tone perception: Effects of tone language repertoire and musical experience.

Toh X, Lau F, Wong F Front Psychol. 2022; 13:940363.

PMID: 36248535 PMC: 9557947. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.940363.

References

Polka L . Characterizing the influence of native language experience on adult speech perception. Percept Psychophys. 1992; 52(1):37-52. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206758. View

Wang Y, SPENCE M, Jongman A, SERENO J . Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 106(6):3649-58. DOI: 10.1121/1.428217. View

Fear B, Cutler A, Butterfield S . The strong/weak syllable distinction in English. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995; 97(3):1893-904. DOI: 10.1121/1.412063. View

Polka L . Cross-language speech perception in adults: phonemic, phonetic, and acoustic contributions. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991; 89(6):2961-77. DOI: 10.1121/1.400734. View

Steklis H, Harnad S . From hand to mouth: some critical stages in the evolution of language. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1976; 280:445-55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25508.x. View

Logan J, Lively S, Pisoni D . Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991; 89(2):874-86. PMC: 3518834. DOI: 10.1121/1.1894649. View

Flege J, McCutcheon M, Smith S . The development of skill in producing word-final English stops. J Acoust Soc Am. 1987; 82(2):433-47. DOI: 10.1121/1.395444. View

Jamieson D, Morosan D . Training non-native speech contrasts in adults: acquisition of the English /delta/-/theta/ contrast by francophones. Percept Psychophys. 1986; 40(4):205-15. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211500. View

Best C, McRoberts G, Goodell E . Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001; 109(2):775-94. PMC: 2777975. DOI: 10.1121/1.1332378. View

10.

Polka L . Linguistic influences in adult perception of non-native vowel contrasts. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995; 97(2):1286-96. DOI: 10.1121/1.412170. View

11.

Guion S, Flege J, Pruitt J . An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: the case of Japanese adults' perception of English consonants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 107(5 Pt 1):2711-24. DOI: 10.1121/1.428657. View

12.

Cutler A, Otake T . Pitch accent in spoken-word recognition in Japanese. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999; 105(3):1877-88. DOI: 10.1121/1.426724. View

13.

Lee Y, Vakoch D, Wurm L . Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: a cross-linguistic comparison. J Psycholinguist Res. 1996; 25(5):527-42. DOI: 10.1007/BF01758181. View

14.

Werker J, Tees R . Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984; 75(6):1866-78. DOI: 10.1121/1.390988. View

15.

Gandour J, Harshman R . Crosslanguage differences in tone perception: a multidimensional scaling investigation. Lang Speech. 1978; 21(1):1-33. DOI: 10.1177/002383097802100101. View

16.

Hirata Y . Training native English speakers to perceive Japanese length contrasts in word versus sentence contexts. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004; 116(4 Pt 1):2384-94. DOI: 10.1121/1.1783351. View

17.

Sugito M . Timing relationships between prosodic and segmental control in Osaka Japanese word accent. Phonetica. 2003; 60(1):1-16. DOI: 10.1159/000070451. View