» Articles » PMID: 37733212

The Adherence and Outcomes Benefits of Using a Connected, Reusable Auto-Injector for Self-Injecting Biologics: A Narrative Review

Overview
Journal Adv Ther
Date 2023 Sep 21
PMID 37733212
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many biologics are now self-administered by patients at home. A variety of self-injection devices are available, including vials and syringes, prefilled syringes, and spring-driven prefilled pens or auto-injectors. Each has advantages and drawbacks, and different devices suit different patients. For example, some patients have difficulty achieving consistent and successful self-injection due to poor manual dexterity, or experience anxiety at the prospect of self-injection or injection-site pain. These factors can reduce patients' medication adherence and overall experience. Furthermore, while self-injection brings patients many benefits, the proliferation of single-use injection devices has implications for environmental sustainability, including the reliance on single-use plastics, repeated freighting requirements, and need for incineration as hazardous waste. Recently developed, innovative electromechanical auto-injector devices offer technological enhancements over existing devices to overcome some of these issues. Features include customisable injection speeds or durations, consistent rate of injection, electronic injection logs and reminders, and step-by-step, real-time instructions. Indeed, a growing body of evidence points to higher adherence rates among patients using electromechanical devices compared with other devices. Further, with time, the reusability of electromechanical devices may prove to lighten the environmental impact compared with disposable devices, especially as research continues to optimise their sustainability, driven by increased consumer demands for environmental responsibility. This narrative review discusses the differences between prefilled syringes, spring-driven prefilled pens, and electromechanical devices. It also explores how these features may help reduce injection-associated pain and anxiety, improve patient experience, connectivity and adherence, and drive sustainability of biologic drugs in future.

Citing Articles

Pharmacokinetics of Depemokimab Delivered by Safety Syringe Device or Autoinjector in Healthy Adults: A Phase 1, Single-Dose Study.

Schalkwijk S, Zecchin C, Sen A, Choi S, Wang K, Min J Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2025; 14(3):190-199.

PMID: 39876532 PMC: 11905874. DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.1506.


Glass Silicone Oil Free Pre-filled Syringe as Primary Container in Autoinjector.

Zhao X, Chen Y, Hamzaoui H, Wen X, Song J, Wang K Pharm Res. 2024; 41(12):2319-2329.

PMID: 39638988 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-024-03795-y.


A Risk-Based Assessment for Determining the Pharmacokinetic Comparability Requirements of Biologic-Device Combination Products Administered by Subcutaneous Injection.

Nohr M, Waheed S, Kildemoes R, Hatorp V, Baekdal T, Adrian C AAPS J. 2024; 26(5):100.

PMID: 39231891 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-024-00968-w.


Postmarketing Reports of Incomplete Dosing-Related Complications with Self-Injected PCSK9 Inhibitors: A Descriptive Study and Disproportionality Analysis.

Woods R BioDrugs. 2024; 38(4):589-600.

PMID: 38874875 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00664-3.


Disease-Agnostic Electronic Adherence Aid for Subcutaneous at-Home and Self-Administration Devices-The Lowest Common Denominator Based on a Cross-Indication Survey.

Bittner B, Munoz F, ODonoghue J, Ordonez J, Schmidt J, Schmitt K ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2024; 7(5):1310-1319.

PMID: 38751643 PMC: 11091979. DOI: 10.1021/acsptsci.3c00377.


References
1.
Humphreys J, Hyrich K, Symmons D . What is the impact of biologic therapies on common co-morbidities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016; 18(1):282. PMC: 5134078. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-016-1176-x. View

2.
Soleimani B, Murray K, Hunt D . Established and Emerging Immunological Complications of Biological Therapeutics in Multiple Sclerosis. Drug Saf. 2019; 42(8):941-956. DOI: 10.1007/s40264-019-00799-1. View

3.
Juillerat P, Grueber M, Ruetsch R, Santi G, Vuillemoz M, Michetti P . Positioning biologics in the treatment of IBD: A practical guide . Curr Res Pharmacol Drug Discov. 2022; 3:100104. PMC: 9092374. DOI: 10.1016/j.crphar.2022.100104. View

4.
Kamata M, Tada Y . Efficacy and Safety of Biologics for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis and Their Impact on Comorbidities: A Literature Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(5). PMC: 7084606. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21051690. View

5.
Tsimberidou A, Fountzilas E, Nikanjam M, Kurzrock R . Review of precision cancer medicine: Evolution of the treatment paradigm. Cancer Treat Rev. 2020; 86:102019. PMC: 7272286. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102019. View