» Articles » PMID: 37730972

Discordance Diagnosis Between B-mode Ultrasonography and MRI Proton Density Fat Fraction for Fatty Liver

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Sep 21
PMID 37730972
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the frequency and causes of discordant results in fatty liver (FL) diagnosis between B-mode ultrasonography (B-USG) and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). We analyzed patients who underwent both B-USG and MRI-PDFF within a 6-month interval. We made a confusion matrix for FL diagnosis between B-USG and MRI-PDFF and identified four discordant groups as follows: (1) the "UFL-MnFL-wo" group [B-USG FL-MRI-PDFF no FL without chronic liver disease (CLD) or liver cirrhosis (LC)]; (2) the "UFL-MnFL-w" group (B-USG FL-MRI-PDFF no FL with CLD or LC); (3) the "UnFL-MFL-wo" group (B-USG no FL-MRI-PDFF FL without CLD or LC); and (4) the "UnFL-MFL-w" group (B-USG no FL-MRI-PDFF FL with CLD or LC). We compared the "UFL-MnFL-wo" group with the control group in terms of various parameters. We found 201 patients (201/1514, 13.3%) with discordant results for FL diagnosis between B-USG and MRI-PDFF. The "UFL-MnFL-wo" group accounted for the largest portion at 6.8% (103/1514), followed by the "UFL-MnFL-w" group (79/1514, 5.2%) and the "UnFL-MFL-w" group (16/1514, 1.1%). The mean and right PDFF values, body mass index, and abdominal wall thickness were significantly higher in the "UFL-MnFL-wo" group than in the control group (p ≤ 0.001). The frequency of discordant results in the diagnosis of FL between B-USG and MRI-PDFF could be identified. The causes of discordant results were that B-USG was fairly accurate in diagnosing FL disease and that accompanying CLD or LC hindered the evaluation of FL.

References
1.
Williams C, Stengel J, Asike M, Torres D, Shaw J, Contreras M . Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis among a largely middle-aged population utilizing ultrasound and liver biopsy: a prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2010; 140(1):124-31. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.09.038. View

2.
Lee J, Kim K, Lee S, Yu E, Lim Y, Lee H . Prevalence and risk factors of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in potential living liver donors in Korea: a review of 589 consecutive liver biopsies in a single center. J Hepatol. 2007; 47(2):239-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.02.007. View

3.
Yokoo T, Serai S, Pirasteh A, Bashir M, Hamilton G, Hernando D . Linearity, Bias, and Precision of Hepatic Proton Density Fat Fraction Measurements by Using MR Imaging: A Meta-Analysis. Radiology. 2017; 286(2):486-498. PMC: 5813433. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017170550. View

4.
Gu J, Liu S, Du S, Zhang Q, Xiao J, Dong Q . Diagnostic value of MRI-PDFF for hepatic steatosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2019; 29(7):3564-3573. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06072-4. View

5.
Greber-Platzer S, Thajer A, Bohn S, Brunert A, Boerner F, Siegfried W . Increased liver echogenicity and liver enzymes are associated with extreme obesity, adolescent age and male gender: analysis from the German/Austrian/Swiss obesity registry APV. BMC Pediatr. 2019; 19(1):332. PMC: 6739932. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-019-1711-4. View