» Articles » PMID: 29356032

Noninvasive, Quantitative Assessment of Liver Fat by MRI-PDFF As an Endpoint in NASH Trials

Overview
Journal Hepatology
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2018 Jan 23
PMID 29356032
Citations 175
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is currently the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide, and the progressive form of this condition, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), has become one of the leading indications for liver transplantation. Despite intensive investigations, there are currently no United States Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for treating NASH. A major barrier for drug development in NASH is that treatment response assessment continues to require liver biopsy, which is invasive and interpreted subjectively. Therefore, there is a major unmet need for developing noninvasive, objective, and quantitative biomarkers for diagnosis and assessment of treatment response. Emerging data support the use of magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) as a noninvasive, quantitative, and accurate measure of liver fat content to assess treatment response in early-phase NASH trials. In this review, we discuss the role and utility, including potential sample size reduction, of MRI-PDFF as a quantitative and noninvasive imaging-based biomarker in early-phase NASH trials. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is currently the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. NAFLD can be broadly classified into two categories: nonalcoholic fatty liver, which has a minimal risk of progression to cirrhosis, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the more progressive form of NAFLD, which has a significantly increased risk of progression to cirrhosis. Over the past two decades, NASH-related cirrhosis has become the second leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States. For these reasons, pharmacological therapy for NASH is needed urgently. Despite intensive investigations, there are currently no therapies for treating NASH that have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration..

Citing Articles

Comparative Efficacy of NAFLD Therapies and Biomarker Associations: A Meta-Analysis Based on Liver Fat Content.

Zhu H, Xu L, Lv Y, Yang J, Huang J, Zheng Q Gastro Hep Adv. 2025; 4(4):100593.

PMID: 40026701 PMC: 11869496. DOI: 10.1016/j.gastha.2024.100593.


Systematic Review: AI Applications in Liver Imaging with a Focus on Segmentation and Detection.

Pomohaci M, Grasu M, Baicoianu-Nitescu A, Enache R, Lupescu I Life (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40003667 PMC: 11856300. DOI: 10.3390/life15020258.


Perspectives and Tools in Liver Graft Assessment: A Transformative Era in Liver Transplantation.

Safi K, Pawlicka A, Pradhan B, Sobieraj J, Zhylko A, Struga M Biomedicines. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40002907 PMC: 11852418. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13020494.


Quantification of liver fat deposition in obese and diabetic patients: A pilot study on the correlation with myocardium and periapical fat content.

Chen X, Wen H, Li Q, Shen L, Luo X, Zhou B Liver Res. 2025; 6(2):103-110.

PMID: 39958629 PMC: 11791804. DOI: 10.1016/j.livres.2022.05.005.


Diagnostic of fatty liver using radiomics and deep learning models on non-contrast abdominal CT.

Zhang H, Liu J, Su D, Bai Z, Wu Y, Ma Y PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0310938.

PMID: 39946425 PMC: 11825062. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310938.


References
1.
Bravo A, Sheth S, Chopra S . Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344(7):495-500. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200102153440706. View

2.
Kleiner D, Brunt E, Van Natta M, Behling C, Contos M, Cummings O . Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005; 41(6):1313-21. DOI: 10.1002/hep.20701. View

3.
Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Heurtier A, Gombert S, Giral P, Bruckert E . Sampling variability of liver biopsy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2005; 128(7):1898-906. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.084. View

4.
Liu C, McKenzie C, Yu H, Brittain J, Reeder S . Fat quantification with IDEAL gradient echo imaging: correction of bias from T(1) and noise. Magn Reson Med. 2007; 58(2):354-64. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21301. View

5.
Yu H, McKenzie C, Shimakawa A, Vu A, Brau A, Beatty P . Multiecho reconstruction for simultaneous water-fat decomposition and T2* estimation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 26(4):1153-61. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21090. View