» Articles » PMID: 37719904

Impact of Personal Protective Equipment on Patient Safety and Health Care Workers

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Sep 18
PMID 37719904
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The study aims to assess the effect of personal protective equipment (PPE) on the physical and psychological well-being of health care workers (HCWs) and its impact on patient safety.

Methods: After ethical approval, a 14-point questionnaire was circulated offline and online among the HCWs of ours institute, who were involved in performing invasive procedures while wearing a PPE. The responses were analysed using the SPSS software version 26.

Results: Of 198 responses, the mean duration of PPE use was 4.6 ± 1.52 h. Seventy percent of respondents suggested <4 h of continuous use of PPE. Seventy-seven percent found difficulties during the procedures while wearing PPE and agreed to errors while performing a procedure. Poor visibility (95.5%), fogging (84.9%), communication difficulty (75.3%), sweating (74.2%), posture-related discomfort (56.1%) and poor concentration (51%) were major causes. Anxiety (39.9%) and fear of spreading an infection to the family (42.9%) were major psychological effects. Eighty percent of HCWs raised concern over the quality of PPE, N95 mask and eye protector. The HCWs felt the need to improve the quality of PPEs, use extra padding around the ears, sealing the N95 mask with adhesive tape, besides using sign language for communication for more safety. Fifty percent graded the procedure-related difficulty level >6 on a Likert scale of 1-10.

Conclusion: PPE-related discomfort is common among the HCWs and could contribute to errors during an invasive procedure. Efforts to alleviate the physical and psychological well-being of the HCWs will be essential for reducing procedural error while wearing a PPE.

Citing Articles

Influence of Different Protection States on the Mental Fatigue of Nurses During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Jin H, Xiao M, Gong Z, Zhao Y Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022; 15:1917-1929.

PMID: 36268181 PMC: 9578785. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S377936.

References
1.
Benitez C, Guemes A, Aranda J, Ribeiro M, Ottolino P, Di Saverio S . Impact of Personal Protective Equipment on Surgical Performance During the COVID-19 Pandemic. World J Surg. 2020; 44(9):2842-2847. PMC: 7305697. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05648-2. View

2.
Aydemir D, Ulusu N . Correspondence: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 coated nanoparticles containing respiratory masks, chewing gums and nasal filters may be used for protection against COVID-19 infection. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020; 37:101697. PMC: 7195061. DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101697. View

3.
Rapisarda L, Trimboli M, Fortunato F, De Martino A, Marsico O, Demonte G . Facemask headache: a new nosographic entity among healthcare providers in COVID-19 era. Neurol Sci. 2021; 42(4):1267-1276. PMC: 7838234. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-021-05075-8. View

4.
Behan C . The benefits of meditation and mindfulness practices during times of crisis such as COVID-19. Ir J Psychol Med. 2020; 37(4):256-258. PMC: 7287297. DOI: 10.1017/ipm.2020.38. View

5.
Singh M, Pawar M, Bothra A, Maheshwari A, Dubey V, Tiwari A . Personal protective equipment induced facial dermatoses in healthcare workers managing Coronavirus disease 2019. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020; 34(8):e378-e380. PMC: 7272982. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16628. View