Self-contamination During Doffing of Personal Protective Equipment by Healthcare Workers to Prevent Ebola Transmission

Overview

Journal Antimicrob Resist Infect Control

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Infectious Diseases

Date 2019 Jan 5

PMID 30607244

Citations 47

Authors

Lorna K P Suen

Yue Ping Guo

Danny W K Tong

Polly H M Leung

David Lung

Mandy S P Ng

Timothy K H Lai

Kiki Y K Lo

Cypher H Au-Yeung

Winnie Yu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) use personal protective equipment (PPE) in Ebola virus disease (EVD) situations. However, preventing the contamination of HCWs and the environment during PPE removal crucially requires improved strategies. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of three PPE ensembles, namely, Hospital Authority (HA) Standard Ebola PPE set (PPE1), Dupont Tyvek Model, style 1422A (PPE2), and HA isolation gown for routine patient care and performing aerosol-generating procedures (PPE3) to prevent EVD transmission by measuring the degree of contamination of HCWs and the environment.

Methods: A total of 59 participants randomly performed PPE donning and doffing. The trial consisted of PPE donning, applying fluorescent solution on the PPE surface, PPE doffing of participants, and estimation of the degree of contamination as indicated by the number of fluorescent stains on the working clothes and environment. Protocol deviations during PPE donning and doffing were monitored.

Results: PPE2 and PPE3 presented higher contamination risks than PPE1. Environmental contaminations such as those originating from rubbish bin covers, chairs, faucets, and sinks were detected. Procedure deviations were observed during PPE donning and doffing, with PPE1 presenting the lowest overall deviation rate (%) among the three PPE ensembles ( 0.05).

Conclusion: Contamination of the subjects' working clothes and surrounding environment occurred frequently during PPE doffing. Procedure deviations were observed during PPE donning and doffing. Although PPE1 presented a lower contamination risk than PPE2 and PPE3 during doffing and protocol deviations, the design of PPE1 can still be further improved. Future directions should focus on designing a high-coverage-area PPE with simple ergonomic features and on evaluating the doffing procedure to minimise the risk of recontamination. Regular training for users should be emphasised to minimise protocol deviations, and in turn, guarantee the best protection to HCWs.

Citing Articles

Is there sufficient evidence to inform personal protective equipment choices for healthcare workers caring for patients with viral hemorrhagic fevers?.

Graham A, Ettles S, McGrath M, Ogunremi T, Selkirk J, Bruce N Can Commun Dis Rep. 2025; 51(1):7-15.

PMID: 39781232 PMC: 11706576. DOI: 10.14745/ccdr.v51i01a02.

Protecting healthcare workers and patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparison of baseline and follow-up infection prevention and control needs in Nigerian military healthcare facilities delivering HIV services.

Lee E, Rashid A, Lawal I, Adekanye U, Adamu Y, Godfrey C BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):1254.

PMID: 37964245 PMC: 10647028. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10289-x.

Impact of personal protective equipment on patient safety and health care workers.

Kumar P, Jain M, Amirthavaali G, Mishra T, Sasmal P, Lubaib K Med J Armed Forces India. 2023; 79(5):531-538.

PMID: 37719904 PMC: 10499652. DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.07.004.

Assessment of Role of PPE in Preventing the Spread of Infection among the Dental Surgeons: A Prospective Study.

Srinidhi S, Stephen S, Mohankumar K, DCruz T, Subbiah K, Subbiah G J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023; 15(Suppl 1):S362-S366.

PMID: 37654383 PMC: 10466661. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_546_22.

COVID-19-specific adult basic life support guideline strategies for chiropractors and other healthcare providers to maximize the safety and efficacy of resuscitation: a commentary.

Woo C Chiropr Man Therap. 2023; 31(1):16.

PMID: 37277875 PMC: 10241126. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-023-00488-y.

References

Kang J, ODonnell J, Colaianne B, Bircher N, Ren D, Smith K . Use of personal protective equipment among health care personnel: Results of clinical observations and simulations. Am J Infect Control. 2017; 45(1):17-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.08.011. View

Casanova L, Teal L, Sickbert-Bennett E, Anderson D, Sexton D, Rutala W . Assessment of Self-Contamination During Removal of Personal Protective Equipment for Ebola Patient Care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016; 37(10):1156-61. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2016.169. View

Casanova L, Alfano-Sobsey E, Rutala W, Weber D, Sobsey M . Virus transfer from personal protective equipment to healthcare employees' skin and clothing. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008; 14(8):1291-3. PMC: 2600382. DOI: 10.3201/eid1408.080085. View

Bell T, Smoot J, Patterson J, Smalligan R, Jordan R . Ebola virus disease: The use of fluorescents as markers of contamination for personal protective equipment. IDCases. 2016; 2(1):27-30. PMC: 4672605. DOI: 10.1016/j.idcr.2014.12.003. View

Kwon J, Burnham C, Reske K, Liang S, Hink T, Wallace M . Assessment of Healthcare Worker Protocol Deviations and Self-Contamination During Personal Protective Equipment Donning and Doffing. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017; 38(9):1077-1083. PMC: 6263164. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2017.121. View

Edmond M, Diekema D, Perencevich E . Ebola virus disease and the need for new personal protective equipment. JAMA. 2014; 312(23):2495-6. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.15497. View

Zellmer C, Van Hoof S, Safdar N . Variation in health care worker removal of personal protective equipment. Am J Infect Control. 2015; 43(7):750-1. PMC: 7132814. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.02.005. View

Guo Y, Li Y, Wong P . Environment and body contamination: a comparison of two different removal methods in three types of personal protective clothing. Am J Infect Control. 2014; 42(4):e39-45. PMC: 7115291. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.12.021. View

Tomas M, Kundrapu S, Thota P, Sunkesula V, Cadnum J, Mana T . Contamination of Health Care Personnel During Removal of Personal Protective Equipment. JAMA Intern Med. 2015; 175(12):1904-10. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4535. View

10.

Wong T, Chung J, Li Y, Chan W, Ching P, Lam C . Effective personal protective clothing for health care workers attending patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Am J Infect Control. 2004; 32(2):90-6. PMC: 7137615. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2003.08.004. View

11.

Lai J, Guo Y, Or P, Li Y . Comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances. Am J Infect Control. 2010; 39(2):104-11. PMC: 7115311. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.06.007. View

12.

Casanova L, Rutala W, Weber D, Sobsey M . Effect of single- versus double-gloving on virus transfer to health care workers' skin and clothing during removal of personal protective equipment. Am J Infect Control. 2011; 40(4):369-74. PMC: 7115263. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.324. View

13.

Clay K, OShea M, Fletcher T, Moore A, Burns D, Craig D . Use of an ultraviolet tracer in simulation training for the clinical management of Ebola virus disease. J Hosp Infect. 2015; 91(3):275-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.07.006. View

14.

Fischer 2nd W, Weber D, Wohl D . Personal Protective Equipment: Protecting Health Care Providers in an Ebola Outbreak. Clin Ther. 2015; 37(11):2402-2410. PMC: 4661082. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.07.007. View

15.

Hall S, Poller B, Bailey C, Gregory S, Clark R, Roberts P . Use of ultraviolet-fluorescence-based simulation in evaluation of personal protective equipment worn for first assessment and care of a patient with suspected high-consequence infectious disease. J Hosp Infect. 2018; 99(2):218-228. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.01.002. View

16.

Herlihey T, Gelmi S, Flewwelling C, Hall T, Banez C, Morita P . Personal Protective Equipment for Infectious Disease Preparedness: A Human Factors Evaluation. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016; 37(9):1022-8. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2016.124. View

17.

Poller B, Hall S, Bailey C, Gregory S, Clark R, Roberts P . 'VIOLET': a fluorescence-based simulation exercise for training healthcare workers in the use of personal protective equipment. J Hosp Infect. 2018; 99(2):229-235. PMC: 7133760. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.01.021. View

18.

Zamora J, Murdoch J, Simchison B, Day A . Contamination: a comparison of 2 personal protective systems. CMAJ. 2006; 175(3):249-54. PMC: 1513425. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.060094. View

19.

Lim S, Cha W, Chae M, Jo I . Contamination during doffing of personal protective equipment by healthcare providers. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2016; 2(3):162-167. PMC: 5052842. DOI: 10.15441/ceem.15.019. View