Toxicity Assessment of CeO₂ and CuO Nanoparticles at the Air-liquid Interface Using Bioinspired Condensational Particle Growth

Overview

Journal Hyg Environ Health Adv

Specialty Environmental Health

Date 2023 Sep 15

PMID 37711680

Authors

Trevor B Tilly

Ryan X Ward

Alyssa F Morea

M Tyler Nelson

Sarah E Robinson

Arantzazu Eiguren-Fernandez

Gregory S Lewis

John A Lednicky

Tara Sabo-Attwood

Saber M Hussain

Chang-Yu Wu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

CeO and CuO nanoparticles (NPs) are used as additives in petrodiesel to enhance engine performance leading to reduced diesel combustion emissions. Despite their benefits, the additive application poses human health concerns by releasing inhalable NPs into the ambient air. In this study, a bioinspired lung cell exposure system, Dosimetric Aerosol Inhalation Device (DAVID), was employed for evaluating the toxicity of aerosolized CeO and CuO NPs with a short duration of exposure (≤10 min vs. hours in other systems) and without exerting toxicity from non-NP factors. Human epithelial A549 lung cells were cultured and maintained within DAVID at the air-liquid interface (ALI), onto which aerosolized NPs were deposited, and experiments in submerged cells were used for comparison. Exposure of the cells to the CeO NPs did not result in detectable IL-8 release, nor did it produce a significant reduction in cell viability based on lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay, with a marginal decrease (10%) at the dose of 388 μg/cm (273 cm/cm). In contrast, exposure to CuO NPs resulted in a concentration dependent reduction in LDH release based on LDH leakage, with 38% reduction in viability at the highest dose of 52 μg/cm (28.3 cm/cm). Cells exposed to CuO NPs resulted in a dose dependent cellular membrane toxicity and expressed IL-8 secretion at a global dose five times lower than cells exposed under submerged conditions. However, when comparing the ALI results at the local cellular dose of CuO NPs to the submerged results, the IL-8 secretion was similar. In this study, we demonstrated DAVID as a new exposure tool that helps evaluate aerosol toxicity in simulated lung environment. Our results also highlight the necessity in choosing the right assay endpoints for the given exposure scenario, e.g., LDH for ALI and Deep Blue for submerged conditions for cell viability.

References

Biswas P, Wu C . Nanoparticles and the environment. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2005; 55(6):708-46. DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2005.10464656. View

Rach J, Budde J, Mohle N, Aufderheide M . Direct exposure at the air-liquid interface: evaluation of an in vitro approach for simulating inhalation of airborne substances. J Appl Toxicol. 2013; 34(5):506-15. DOI: 10.1002/jat.2899. View

Hussain S, Warheit D, Ng S, Comfort K, Grabinski C, Braydich-Stolle L . At the Crossroads of Nanotoxicology in vitro: Past Achievements and Current Challenges. Toxicol Sci. 2015; 147(1):5-16. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv106. View

Jing X, Park J, Peters T, Thorne P . Toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles in lung epithelial cells exposed at the air-liquid interface compared with in vivo assessment. Toxicol In Vitro. 2015; 29(3):502-11. PMC: 4373347. DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2014.12.023. View

Hufnagel M, Schoch S, Wall J, Strauch B, Hartwig A . Toxicity and Gene Expression Profiling of Copper- and Titanium-Based Nanoparticles Using Air-Liquid Interface Exposure. Chem Res Toxicol. 2020; 33(5):1237-1249. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00489. View

Li Y, Li P, Yu H, Bian Y . Recent advances (2010-2015) in studies of cerium oxide nanoparticles' health effects. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016; 44:25-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2016.04.004. View

Ong K, MacCormack T, Clark R, Ede J, Ortega V, Felix L . Widespread nanoparticle-assay interference: implications for nanotoxicity testing. PLoS One. 2014; 9(3):e90650. PMC: 3949728. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090650. View

Karlsson H, Cronholm P, Gustafsson J, Moller L . Copper oxide nanoparticles are highly toxic: a comparison between metal oxide nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes. Chem Res Toxicol. 2008; 21(9):1726-32. DOI: 10.1021/tx800064j. View

Cohen J, Teeguarden J, Demokritou P . An integrated approach for the in vitro dosimetry of engineered nanomaterials. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2014; 11:20. PMC: 4024018. DOI: 10.1186/1743-8977-11-20. View

10.

Ward R, Tilly T, Mazhar S, Robinson S, Eiguren-Fernandez A, Wang J . Mimicking the human respiratory system: Online in vitro cell exposure for toxicity assessment of welding fume aerosol. J Hazard Mater. 2020; 395:122687. PMC: 7276288. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122687. View

11.

Monteiller C, Tran L, MacNee W, Faux S, Jones A, Miller B . The pro-inflammatory effects of low-toxicity low-solubility particles, nanoparticles and fine particles, on epithelial cells in vitro: the role of surface area. Occup Environ Med. 2007; 64(9):609-15. PMC: 2092561. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2005.024802. View

12.

Raemy D, Limbach L, Rothen-Rutishauser B, Grass R, Gehr P, Birbaum K . Cerium oxide nanoparticle uptake kinetics from the gas-phase into lung cells in vitro is transport limited. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2010; 77(3):368-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.11.017. View

13.

Holder A, Goth-Goldstein R, Lucas D, Koshland C . Particle-induced artifacts in the MTT and LDH viability assays. Chem Res Toxicol. 2012; 25(9):1885-92. PMC: 3446248. DOI: 10.1021/tx3001708. View

14.

Holder A, Lucas D, Goth-Goldstein R, Koshland C . Cellular response to diesel exhaust particles strongly depends on the exposure method. Toxicol Sci. 2008; 103(1):108-15. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfn014. View

15.

Herzog F, Loza K, Balog S, Clift M, Epple M, Gehr P . Mimicking exposures to acute and lifetime concentrations of inhaled silver nanoparticles by two different in vitro approaches. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2014; 5:1357-70. PMC: 4168965. DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.5.149. View

16.

Eiguren Fernandez A, Lewis G, Hering S . Design and Laboratory Evaluation of a Sequential Spot Sampler for Time-Resolved Measurement of Airborne Particle Composition. Aerosol Sci Technol. 2014; 48(6):655-663. PMC: 4097308. DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2014.911409. View

17.

Lichtveld K, Ebersviller S, Sexton K, Vizuete W, Jaspers I, Jeffries H . In vitro exposures in diesel exhaust atmospheres: resuspension of PM from filters versus direct deposition of PM from air. Environ Sci Technol. 2012; 46(16):9062-70. PMC: 3424394. DOI: 10.1021/es301431s. View

18.

Deloid G, Cohen J, Darrah T, Derk R, Rojanasakul L, Pyrgiotakis G . Estimating the effective density of engineered nanomaterials for in vitro dosimetry. Nat Commun. 2014; 5:3514. PMC: 4038248. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4514. View

19.

Tilly T, Ward R, Luthra J, Robinson S, Eiguren-Fernandez A, Lewis G . Condensational particle growth device for reliable cell exposure at the air-liquid interface to nanoparticles. Aerosol Sci Technol. 2020; 53(12):1415-1428. PMC: 7540808. DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2019.1659938. View

20.

Rampersad S . Multiple applications of Alamar Blue as an indicator of metabolic function and cellular health in cell viability bioassays. Sensors (Basel). 2012; 12(9):12347-60. PMC: 3478843. DOI: 10.3390/s120912347. View