» Articles » PMID: 37691028

Predicting Sepsis Using a Combination of Clinical Information and Molecular Immune Markers Sampled in the Ambulance

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Sep 10
PMID 37691028
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sepsis is a time dependent condition. Screening tools based on clinical parameters have been shown to increase the identification of sepsis. The aim of current study was to evaluate the additional predictive value of immunological molecular markers to our previously developed prehospital screening tools. This is a prospective cohort study of 551 adult patients with suspected infection in the ambulance setting of Stockholm, Sweden between 2017 and 2018. Initially, 74 molecules and 15 genes related to inflammation were evaluated in a screening cohort of 46 patients with outcome sepsis and 50 patients with outcome infection no sepsis. Next, 12 selected molecules, as potentially synergistic predictors, were evaluated in combination with our previously developed screening tools based on clinical parameters in a prediction cohort (n = 455). Seven different algorithms with nested cross-validation were used in the machine learning of the prediction models. Model performances were compared using posterior distributions of average area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and difference in AUCs. Model variable importance was assessed by permutation of variable values, scoring loss of classification as metric and with model-specific weights when applicable. When comparing the screening tools with and without added molecular variables, and their interactions, the molecules per se did not increase the predictive values. Prediction models based on the molecular variables alone showed a performance in terms of AUCs between 0.65 and 0.70. Among the molecular variables, IL-1Ra, IL-17A, CCL19, CX3CL1 and TNF were significantly higher in septic patients compared to the infection non-sepsis group. Combing immunological molecular markers with clinical parameters did not increase the predictive values of the screening tools, most likely due to the high multicollinearity of temperature and some of the markers. A group of sepsis patients was consistently miss-classified in our prediction models, due to milder symptoms as well as lower expression levels of the investigated immune mediators. This indicates a need of stratifying septic patients with a priori knowledge of certain clinical and molecular parameters in order to improve prediction for early sepsis diagnosis.Trial registration: NCT03249597. Registered 15 August 2017.

Citing Articles

Gut microbiota, circulating inflammatory proteins and sepsis: a bi-directional Mendelian randomization study.

Li Z, Lin L, Kong Y, Feng J, Ren X, Wang Y Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024; 14:1398756.

PMID: 39176264 PMC: 11338885. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1398756.


Clinical Research in Prehospital Care: Current and Future Challenges.

Cimino J, Braun C Clin Pract. 2023; 13(5):1266-1285.

PMID: 37887090 PMC: 10605888. DOI: 10.3390/clinpract13050114.

References
1.
Singer M . The new sepsis consensus definitions (Sepsis-3): the good, the not-so-bad, and the actually-quite-pretty. Intensive Care Med. 2016; 42(12):2027-2029. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-016-4600-4. View

2.
Wallgren U, Castren M, Svensson A, Kurland L . Identification of adult septic patients in the prehospital setting: a comparison of two screening tools and clinical judgment. Eur J Emerg Med. 2013; 21(4):260-5. DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000084. View

3.
Yende S, Kellum J, Talisa V, Peck Palmer O, Chang C, Filbin M . Long-term Host Immune Response Trajectories Among Hospitalized Patients With Sepsis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2(8):e198686. PMC: 6686981. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8686. View

4.
Bauer M, Gerlach H, Vogelmann T, Preissing F, Stiefel J, Adam D . Mortality in sepsis and septic shock in Europe, North America and Australia between 2009 and 2019- results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2020; 24(1):239. PMC: 7236499. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-02950-2. View

5.
Wang H, Weaver M, Shapiro N, Yealy D . Opportunities for Emergency Medical Services care of sepsis. Resuscitation. 2009; 81(2):193-7. PMC: 4028958. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.008. View