Task-based Attentional and Default Mode Connectivity Associated with Science and Math Anxiety Profiles Among University Physics Students

Overview

Journal Trends Neurosci Educ

Specialty Neurology

Date 2023 Sep 9

PMID 37689430

Authors

Donisha D Smith

Alan Meca

Katherine L Bottenhorn

Jessica E Bartley

Michael C Riedel

Taylor Salo

Julio A Peraza

Robert W Laird

Shannon M Pruden

Matthew T Sutherland

Eric Brewe

Angela R Laird

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Attentional control theory (ACT) posits that elevated anxiety increases the probability of re-allocating cognitive resources needed to complete a task to processing anxiety-related stimuli. This process impairs processing efficiency and can lead to reduced performance effectiveness. Science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) students frequently experience anxiety about their coursework, which can interfere with learning and performance and negatively impact student retention and graduation rates. The objective of this study was to extend the ACT framework to investigate the neurobiological associations between science and math anxiety and cognitive performance among 123 physics undergraduate students.

Procedures: Latent profile analysis (LPA) identified four profiles of science and math anxiety among STEM students, including two profiles that represented the majority of the sample (Low Science and Math Anxiety; 59.3% and High Math Anxiety; 21.9%) and two additional profiles that were not well represented (High Science and Math Anxiety; 6.5% and High Science Anxiety; 4.1%). Students underwent a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) session in which they performed two tasks involving physics cognition: the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) task and the Physics Knowledge (PK) task.

Findings: No significant differences were observed in FCI or PK task performance between High Math Anxiety and Low Science and Math Anxiety students. During the three phases of the FCI task, we found no significant brain connectivity differences during scenario and question presentation, yet we observed significant differences during answer selection within and between the dorsal attention network (DAN), ventral attention network (VAN), and default mode network (DMN). Further, we found significant group differences during the PK task were limited to the DAN, including DAN-VAN and within-DAN connectivity.

Conclusions: These results highlight the different cognitive processes required for physics conceptual reasoning compared to physics knowledge retrieval, provide new insight into the underlying brain dynamics associated with anxiety and physics cognition, and confirm the relevance of ACT theory for science and math anxiety.

References

Dosenbach N, Fair D, Miezin F, Cohen A, Wenger K, Dosenbach R . Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(26):11073-8. PMC: 1904171. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0704320104. View

Lydon-Staley D, Kuehner C, Zamoscik V, Huffziger S, Kirsch P, Bassett D . Repetitive negative thinking in daily life and functional connectivity among default mode, fronto-parietal, and salience networks. Transl Psychiatry. 2019; 9(1):234. PMC: 6751201. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-019-0560-0. View

Behzadi Y, Restom K, Liau J, Liu T . A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage. 2007; 37(1):90-101. PMC: 2214855. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042. View

Derakshan N, Ansari T, Hansard M, Shoker L, Eysenck M . Anxiety, inhibition, efficiency, and effectiveness. An investigation using antisaccade task. Exp Psychol. 2009; 56(1):48-55. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.48. View

Qiao L, Luo X, Zhang L, Chen A, Li H, Qiu J . Spontaneous brain state oscillation is associated with self-reported anxiety in a non-clinical sample. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):19754. PMC: 7661527. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76211-1. View

Tustison N, Avants B, Cook P, Zheng Y, Egan A, Yushkevich P . N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010; 29(6):1310-20. PMC: 3071855. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2046908. View

Kim A, Lee D, Anderson B . The influence of threat on the efficiency of goal-directed attentional control. Psychol Res. 2020; 85(3):980-986. PMC: 7530118. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01321-4. View

Megreya A, Al-Emadi A . The impacts of math anxiety, science anxiety, and gender on arts sciences choices in Qatari secondary schools. PeerJ. 2023; 11:e14510. PMC: 9835714. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14510. View

Roberts H, Jacobs R, Bessette K, Crowell S, Westlund-Schreiner M, Thomas L . Mechanisms of rumination change in adolescent depression (RuMeChange): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of rumination-focused cognitive behavioural therapy to reduce ruminative habit and risk of depressive relapse in high-ruminating.... BMC Psychiatry. 2021; 21(1):206. PMC: 8062943. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-021-03193-3. View

10.

Finell J, Sammallahti E, Korhonen J, Eklof H, Jonsson B . Working Memory and Its Mediating Role on the Relationship of Math Anxiety and Math Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Front Psychol. 2022; 12:798090. PMC: 8811497. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.798090. View

11.

Konishi M, McLaren D, Engen H, Smallwood J . Shaped by the Past: The Default Mode Network Supports Cognition that Is Independent of Immediate Perceptual Input. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0132209. PMC: 4488375. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132209. View

12.

Gorgolewski K, Burns C, Madison C, Clark D, Halchenko Y, Waskom M . Nipype: a flexible, lightweight and extensible neuroimaging data processing framework in python. Front Neuroinform. 2011; 5:13. PMC: 3159964. DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2011.00013. View

13.

Stawarczyk D, Jeunehomme O, DArgembeau A . Differential Contributions of Default and Dorsal Attention Networks to Remembering Thoughts and External Stimuli From Real-Life Events. Cereb Cortex. 2017; 28(11):4023-4035. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhx270. View

14.

Kong R, Yang Q, Gordon E, Xue A, Yan X, Orban C . Individual-Specific Areal-Level Parcellations Improve Functional Connectivity Prediction of Behavior. Cereb Cortex. 2021; 31(10):4477-4500. PMC: 8757323. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab101. View

15.

Waldrop M . Why we are teaching science wrong, and how to make it right. Nature. 2015; 523(7560):272-4. DOI: 10.1038/523272a. View

16.

Elton A, Gao W . Task-positive Functional Connectivity of the Default Mode Network Transcends Task Domain. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015; 27(12):2369-81. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00859. View

17.

Corbetta M, Shulman G . Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002; 3(3):201-15. DOI: 10.1038/nrn755. View

18.

Esteban O, Ciric R, Finc K, Blair R, Markiewicz C, Moodie C . Analysis of task-based functional MRI data preprocessed with fMRIPrep. Nat Protoc. 2020; 15(7):2186-2202. PMC: 7404612. DOI: 10.1038/s41596-020-0327-3. View

19.

Aylward J, Valton V, Goer F, Mkrtchian A, Lally N, Peters S . The impact of induced anxiety on affective response inhibition. R Soc Open Sci. 2017; 4(6):170084. PMC: 5493909. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.170084. View

20.

Lee J, Jung K, Park J . Detecting Conditional Dependence Using Flexible Bayesian Latent Class Analysis. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1987. PMC: 7438797. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01987. View