» Articles » PMID: 37675166

Investigating the Slice Thickness Effect on Noise and Diagnostic Content of Single-source Multi-slice Computerized Axial Tomography

Overview
Journal J Med Life
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Sep 7
PMID 37675166
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

High-quality and detailed CT scan images are crucial for accurate diagnosis. Factors such as image noise and slice thickness affect image quality. This study aimed to determine the optimal slice thickness that minimized image noise while maintaining sufficient diagnostic information using the single-source computed tomography head protocol. Single-source CT images were examined using the Linux Operating system Ge Revolution 64-slice CT scanner, and a combination of statical analysis and DICOM CT image analysis was employed. The single-source energy head CT protocol was used to investigate the effect of slice thickness on noise and visibility in images. Different values of slice thickness 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 3.75, 5, 7.5, and 10 were prepared, and then quantitative analysis was performed. Thinner slice thickness decreased image noise, increased visibility, and improved detection. Therefore, the balance between changing the thickness of the slice with the diagnostic content and image noise must be considered. Maximum slice thickness enhances CT image detail and structure despite more noise. Based on the results, a slice thickness of 1.25mm was identified as the optimal choice for reducing image noise and achieving better and more accurate detection using the single-source computed tomography head protocol. The study revealed that image noise tends to increase with greater slice thickness according to the Linux operating system. These findings can serve as a valuable guide for quality control methods in CT centers, emphasizing the need to determine the appropriate slice thickness to ensure an accurate diagnosis.

Citing Articles

Machine learning and deep learning models for preoperative detection of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abbaspour E, Mansoori B, Karimzadhagh S, Chalian M, Pouramini A, Sheida F Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; .

PMID: 39522103 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04668-z.


Deep learning reconstruction for high-resolution computed tomography images of the temporal bone: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction.

Fujita N, Yasaka K, Hatano S, Sakamoto N, Kurokawa R, Abe O Neuroradiology. 2024; 66(7):1105-1112.

PMID: 38514472 PMC: 11150291. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-024-03330-1.


Impact of Voxel Normalization on a Machine Learning-Based Method: A Study on Pulmonary Nodule Malignancy Diagnosis Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT).

Hsiao C, Peng C, Wu F, Cheng D Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(24).

PMID: 38132274 PMC: 10742752. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13243690.

References
1.
Kataria B, Nilsson Althen J, Smedby O, Persson A, Sokjer H, Sandborg M . Assessment of image quality in abdominal computed tomography: Effect of model-based iterative reconstruction, multi-planar reconstruction and slice thickness on potential dose reduction. Eur J Radiol. 2019; 122:108703. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108703. View

2.
Muhler M, Schulz R, Schmidt S, Schmeling A, Reisinger W . The influence of slice thickness on assessment of clavicle ossification in forensic age diagnostics. Int J Legal Med. 2005; 120(1):15-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-005-0010-9. View

3.
Brady S, Trout A, Somasundaram E, Anton C, Li Y, Dillman J . Improving Image Quality and Reducing Radiation Dose for Pediatric CT by Using Deep Learning Reconstruction. Radiology. 2020; 298(1):180-188. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020202317. View

4.
Wisselink H, Jan Pelgrim G, Rook M, Dudurych I, van den Berge M, de Bock G . Improved precision of noise estimation in CT with a volume-based approach. Eur Radiol Exp. 2021; 5(1):39. PMC: 8429536. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-021-00237-x. View

5.
Matsumoto K, Jinzaki M, Tanami Y, Ueno A, Yamada M, Kuribayashi S . Virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kilovoltage switching: improved image quality as compared with that obtained with conventional 120-kVp CT. Radiology. 2011; 259(1):257-62. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11100978. View