» Articles » PMID: 37665711

Focused Shear Wave Beam Propagation in Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Ultrasound transient elastography (TE) technologies for liver stiffness measurement (LSM) utilize vibration of small, flat pistons, which generate shear waves that lack directivity. The most common cause for LSM failure in practice is insufficient shear wave signal at the needed depths. We propose to increase shear wave amplitude by focusing the waves into a directional beam. Here, we demonstrate the generation and propagation of focused shear wave beams (fSWBs) in gelatin.

Methods: Directional fSWBs are generated by vibration at 200-400 Hz of a concave piston embedded near the surface of gelatin phantoms and measured with high-frame-rate ultrasound imaging. Five phantoms with a range of stiffnesses are employed. Shear wave speeds assessed by fSWBs are compared with those by radiation-force-based methods (2D SWE). fSWB amplitudes are compared to predictions using an analytical model.

Results: fSWB-derived shear wave speeds are in good agreement with 2D SWE. The amplitudes of fSWBs are localized to the LSM region and are significantly greater than unfocused shear waves. Overall agreement with theory is observed, with some discrepancies in the theoretical source condition.

Conclusion: Focusing shear waves can increase the signal in the LSM region for TE. Challenges for translation include coupling piston vibration with the patient skin and increased attenuation in vivo compared to the phantoms employed here.

Significance: Fibrosis is the most predictive measure of patient outcome in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Increased shear wave amplitude in the LSM region can reduce fibrosis assessment failure rates by TE, thus reducing the need for invasive methods like biopsy.

Citing Articles

Collagen fibers quantification for liver fibrosis assessment using linear dichroism photoacoustic microscopy.

Qiu Y, Li H, Yu K, Chen J, Qi L, Zhao Y Photoacoustics. 2025; 42:100694.

PMID: 39996157 PMC: 11849640. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2025.100694.


Mechanically anisotropic phantoms for magnetic resonance elastography.

Eckstein K, Yoon D, Ruding M, Balouchzadeh R, Thompson-Mazzeo A, Okamoto R Magn Reson Med. 2024; 93(5):2123-2139.

PMID: 39627953 PMC: 11893262. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30394.


Integrated Difference Autocorrelation: A Novel Approach to Estimate Shear Wave Speed in the Presence of Compression Waves.

Asemani H, Rolland J, Parker K IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2024; 72(2):586-594.

PMID: 39302787 PMC: 11875998. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2024.3464104.


Acoustic radiation force-induced longitudinal shear wave for ultrasound-based viscoelastic evaluation.

Liu H, Lee H, Urban M, Zhou Q, Kijanka P Ultrasonics. 2024; 142:107389.

PMID: 38924960 PMC: 11298294. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2024.107389.

References
1.
Nguyen M, Zhou S, Robert J, Shamdasani V, Xie H . Development of oil-in-gelatin phantoms for viscoelasticity measurement in ultrasound shear wave elastography. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013; 40(1):168-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.08.020. View

2.
Berger A, Shili S, Zuberbuhler F, Hiriart J, Lannes A, Chermak F . Liver Stiffness Measurement With FibroScan: Use the Right Probe in the Right Conditions!. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2019; 10(4):e00023. PMC: 6602786. DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000023. View

3.
Mellema D, Song P, Kinnick R, Urban M, Greenleaf J, Manduca A . Probe Oscillation Shear Elastography (PROSE): A High Frame-Rate Method for Two-Dimensional Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016; 35(9):2098-106. PMC: 5495143. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2550007. View

4.
Pillai A, Voruganti T, Barr R, Langdon J . Diagnostic Accuracy of Shear-Wave Elastography for Breast Lesion Characterization in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Radiol. 2022; 19(5):625-634.e0. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.02.022. View

5.
Parker K, Ormachea J, Will S, Hah Z . Analysis of Transient Shear Wave in Lossy Media. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018; 44(7):1504-1515. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.03.014. View