» Articles » PMID: 37663183

Timing of Surgery and Pre-operative Physiological Parameters As Clinical Predictors of Surgical Outcomes in Traumatic Subaxial Cervical Spine Fractures and Dislocations

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Sep 4
PMID 37663183
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

 To evaluate the risk factors and outcomes in patients surgically treated for subaxial cervical spine injuries with respect of the timing of surgery and preoperative physiological parameters of the patient.  26 patients with sub-axial cervical spine fractures and dislocations were enrolled. Demographic data of patients, appropriate radiological investigation, and physiological parameters like respiratory rate, blood pressure, heart rate, PaO2 and ASIA impairment scale were documented. They were divided pre-operatively into 2 groups. Group U with patients having abnormal physiological parameters and Group S including patients having physiological parameters within normal range. They were further subdivided into early and late groups according to the timing of surgery as U , U S and S . All the patients were called for follow-up at 1, 6 and 12 months.  56 percent of patients in Group S had neurological improvement by one ASIA grade and a good outcome irrespective of the timing of surgery. Patients in Group U having unstable physiological parameters and undergoing early surgical intervention had poor outcomes.  This study concludes that early surgical intervention in physiologically unstable patients had a strong association as a risk factor in the final outcome of the patients in terms of mortality and morbidity. Also, no positive association of improvement in physiologically stable patients with respect to the timing of surgery could be established.

References
1.
Hadley M, Walters B . The case for the future role of evidence-based medicine in the management of cervical spine injuries, with or without fractures. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019; 31(4):457-463. DOI: 10.3171/2019.6.SPINE19652. View

2.
Jug M, Kejzar N, Cimerman M, Bajrovic F . Window of opportunity for surgical decompression in patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019; 32(5):633-641. DOI: 10.3171/2019.10.SPINE19888. View

3.
Vaccaro A, Hulbert R, Patel A, Fisher C, Dvorak M, Lehman Jr R . The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: a novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(21):2365-74. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181557b92. View

4.
Zaveri G, Das G . Management of Sub-axial Cervical Spine Injuries. Indian J Orthop. 2017; 51(6):633-652. PMC: 5688856. DOI: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_192_16. View

5.
Gupta D, Vaghani G, Siddiqui S, Sawhney C, Singh P, Kumar A . Early versus delayed decompression in acute subaxial cervical spinal cord injury: A prospective outcome study at a Level I trauma center from India. Asian J Neurosurg. 2015; 10(3):158-65. PMC: 4553726. DOI: 10.4103/1793-5482.161193. View