Early Versus Delayed Decompression in Acute Subaxial Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective Outcome Study at a Level I Trauma Center from India

Overview

Journal Asian J Neurosurg

Specialty Neurology

Date 2015 Sep 24

PMID 26396601

Citations 8

Authors

Deepak Kumar Gupta

Gaurang Vaghani

Saquib Siddiqui

Chhavi Sawhney

Pankaj Kumar Singh

Atin Kumar

S S Kale

B S Sharma

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aims: This study was done with the aim to compare the clinical outcome and patients' quality of life between early versus delayed surgically treated patients of acute subaxial cervical spinal cord injury. The current study was based on the hypothesis that early surgical decompression and fixations in acute subaxial cervical spinal cord trauma is safe and is associated with improved outcome as compared to delayed surgical decompression.

Materials And Methods: A total of 69 patients were recruited and divided into early decompression surgery Group A (operated within 48 h of trauma; n = 23) and late/delayed decompression surgery Group B (operated between 48 h and 7 days of trauma; n = 46). The patients in both groups were followed up, and comparative differences noted in the neurological outcome, quality of life, and bony fusion.

Results: The early surgery group spent lesser days in the intensive care unit and hospital (Group A 28.6 vs. Group B 35 days) had lesser postoperative complications (Group A 43% vs. Group B 61%) and a reduced mortality (Group A 30% vs. Group B 45%). In Group A, 38% patients had 1 American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade improvement while 31% experienced >2 ASIA grade improvement. In Group B, the neurological improvement was 27% and 32%, respectively (P = 0.7). There was a significant improvement in the postoperative quality of life scores in both groups.

Conclusion: Early surgery in patients with acute subaxial cervical spine injury should be considered strongly in view of the lesser complications, early discharge, and reduced mortality.

Citing Articles

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for subaxial cervical spine injuries; management challenges and early outcome in a neurosurgical center.

Campbell F, Ndukuba K, Ndubuisi C, Okwunodulu O, Mezue W, Ohaegbulam S Surg Neurol Int. 2025; 16:17.

PMID: 39926453 PMC: 11799699. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_667_2024.

Survivorship After Neurocritical Care: A Scoping Review of Outcomes Beyond Physical Status.

LaBuzetta J, Bongbong D, Mlodzinski E, Sheth R, Trando A, Ibrahim N Neurocrit Care. 2024; 41(2):651-664.

PMID: 38622487 PMC: 11377172. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-024-01965-9.

Timing of Surgery and Pre-operative Physiological Parameters as Clinical Predictors of Surgical Outcomes in Traumatic Subaxial Cervical Spine Fractures and Dislocations.

Khanna A, Menon H, Chaudhary V, Sidhdhapuria P, Patel K, Narang C Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2023; 58(4):e586-e591.

PMID: 37663183 PMC: 10468239. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1772240.

Adopting and adapting clinical practice guidelines for timing of decompressive surgery in acute spinal cord injury from a developed world context to a developing region.

Maroufi S, Azadnajafabad S, Pour-Rashidi A, Jazayeri S, Ghodsi Z, Ghawami H Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023; 165(6):1401-1406.

PMID: 37074391 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-023-05591-w.

Myelotomy promotes locomotor recovery in rats subjected to spinal cord injury: A meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials.

Qin C, Zhang W, Yang D, Yang M, Du L, Li J Neural Regen Res. 2018; 13(6):1096-1106.

PMID: 29926838 PMC: 6022467. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.233454.

References

Dolan E, Tator C, Endrenyi L . The value of decompression for acute experimental spinal cord compression injury. J Neurosurg. 1980; 53(6):749-55. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1980.53.6.0749. View

Fehlings M, Tator C . An evidence-based review of decompressive surgery in acute spinal cord injury: rationale, indications, and timing based on experimental and clinical studies. J Neurosurg. 1999; 91(1 Suppl):1-11. DOI: 10.3171/spi.1999.91.1.0001. View

Carlson G, Gorden C, Oliff H, Pillai J, LaManna J . Sustained spinal cord compression: part I: time-dependent effect on long-term pathophysiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(1):86-94. View

Star A, Jones A, COTLER J, Balderston R, Sinha R . Immediate closed reduction of cervical spine dislocations using traction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990; 15(10):1068-72. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199015100-00016. View

La Rosa G, Conti A, Cardali S, Cacciola F, Tomasello F . Does early decompression improve neurological outcome of spinal cord injured patients? Appraisal of the literature using a meta-analytical approach. Spinal Cord. 2004; 42(9):503-12. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101627. View

Dimar 2nd J, Glassman S, Raque G, Zhang Y, Shields C . The influence of spinal canal narrowing and timing of decompression on neurologic recovery after spinal cord contusion in a rat model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24(16):1623-33. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199908150-00002. View

Marshall L, Knowlton S, Garfin S, Klauber M, Eisenberg H, Kopaniky D . Deterioration following spinal cord injury. A multicenter study. J Neurosurg. 1987; 66(3):400-4. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1987.66.3.0400. View

Wilmot C, Hall K . Evaluation of the acute management of tetraplegia: conservative versus surgical treatment. Paraplegia. 1986; 24(3):148-53. DOI: 10.1038/sc.1986.19. View

Fehlings M, Perrin R . The timing of surgical intervention in the treatment of spinal cord injury: a systematic review of recent clinical evidence. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(11 Suppl):S28-35. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000217973.11402.7f. View

10.

Sekhon L, Fehlings M . Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 26(24 Suppl):S2-12. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200112151-00002. View

11.

Bohlman H, Kirkpatrick J, Delamarter R, Leventhal M . Anterior decompression for late pain and paralysis after fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; (300):24-9. View

12.

Fehlings M, Sekhon L, Tator C . The role and timing of decompression in acute spinal cord injury: what do we know? What should we do?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 26(24 Suppl):S101-10. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200112151-00017. View

13.

Chen T, Dickman C, Eleraky M, Sonntag V . The role of decompression for acute incomplete cervical spinal cord injury in cervical spondylosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 23(22):2398-403. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199811150-00007. View

14.

Vaccaro A, Daugherty R, Sheehan T, Dante S, COTLER J, Balderston R . Neurologic outcome of early versus late surgery for cervical spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997; 22(22):2609-13. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199711150-00006. View

15.

Grant G, Mirza S, Chapman J, Winn H, Newell D, Jones D . Risk of early closed reduction in cervical spine subluxation injuries. J Neurosurg. 1999; 90(1 Suppl):13-8. DOI: 10.3171/spi.1999.90.1.0013. View

16.

Guha A, Tator C, Endrenyi L, Piper I . Decompression of the spinal cord improves recovery after acute experimental spinal cord compression injury. Paraplegia. 1987; 25(4):324-39. DOI: 10.1038/sc.1987.61. View

17.

Pointillart V, Petitjean M, Wiart L, Vital J, Lassie P, Thicoipe M . Pharmacological therapy of spinal cord injury during the acute phase. Spinal Cord. 2000; 38(2):71-6. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100962. View

18.

Kraus J, Franti C, Riggins R, Richards D, Borhani N . Incidence of traumatic spinal cord lesions. J Chronic Dis. 1975; 28(9):471-92. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(75)90057-0. View

19.

Duh M, Shepard M, Wilberger J, Bracken M . The effectiveness of surgery on the treatment of acute spinal cord injury and its relation to pharmacological treatment. Neurosurgery. 1994; 35(2):240-8; discussion 248-9. DOI: 10.1227/00006123-199408000-00009. View

20.

Bedbrook G, Sakae T . A review of cervical spine injuries with neurological dysfunction. Paraplegia. 1982; 20(6):321-33. DOI: 10.1038/sc.1982.62. View