» Articles » PMID: 37662854

Evaluation of Bite Force, Quality of Life, and Patients' Satisfaction in Elderly Edentulous Patients Using Implant Overdentures

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2023 Sep 4
PMID 37662854
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the bite force (BF) between complete dentures and implant overdentures (IODs) retained by two mandibular implants. Additionally, we evaluated the quality of life (QoL) and patient satisfaction among individuals using IODs. In addition, the effects of demographic parameters such as age and sex, and clinical parameters such as implant length, implant diameter, attachment height, attachment color, and interimplant distance on BF, QoL, and patient satisfaction were evaluated.

Materials And Methods: A total of 51 edentulous patients rehabilitated with the maxillary complete dentures and mandibular IODs retained by two implants were included in this study. BF was measured using a force meter pre- and post-implant in the same patients. Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) was assessed with the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and patient satisfaction was assessed with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) questionnaires.

Results: It was found that BF values were statistically higher for IODs than complete dentures ( < .001). In terms of attachment height of the OHIP scores, there was a significant difference in the psychological disability and social disability domains ( < .05). When examining the change in patient satisfaction as a function of sex, it was found that mandibular retention satisfaction differed significantly by sex ( < .05), but there was no significant difference in the other domains.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it was observed that the BF increased after the use of IODs. Several factors, including age, interimplant distance, attachment height, and attachment color, were found to impact OHRQoL. Sex and implant diameter were identified as factors affecting patient satisfaction.

References
1.
Pan S, Dagenais M, Thomason J, Awad M, Emami E, Kimoto S . Does mandibular edentulous bone height affect prosthetic treatment success?. J Dent. 2010; 38(11):899-907. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.08.002. View

2.
Michelinakis G, Barclay C, Smith P . The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values. Int J Prosthodont. 2007; 19(5):507-12. View

3.
Reissmann D . Alignment of oral health-related with health-related quality of life assessment. J Prosthodont Res. 2016; 60(2):69-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.01.006. View

4.
Geckili O, Cilingir A, Erdogan O, Kesoglu A, Bilmenoglu C, Ozdiler A . The influence of momentary retention forces on patient satisfaction and quality of life of two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture wearers. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 30(2):397-402. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3774. View

5.
Doornewaard R, Glibert M, Matthys C, Vervaeke S, Bronkhorst E, De Bruyn H . Improvement of Quality of Life with Implant-Supported Mandibular Overdentures and the Effect of Implant Type and Surgical Procedure on Bone and Soft Tissue Stability: A Three-Year Prospective Split-Mouth Trial. J Clin Med. 2019; 8(6). PMC: 6617188. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8060773. View