Effect of Three Different Grafting Materials on Immediate Implant Placement Using Vestibular Socket Therapy in Class II Extraction Sockets in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Overview

Journal BMC Oral Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2023 Sep 1

PMID 37658342

Authors

Mohamed Mofreh Hamed

Maher Mohamed El-Tonsy

Abdelsalam Elaskary

Gaser O Abdelaziz

Safinaz Saleh Saeed

Bassem Nabil Elfahl

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: This study compared the effectiveness of three bone grafting materials used for treating class II fresh extraction sockets in the esthetic zone with immediate implant placement using Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) to evaluate the pink esthetic score (PES), peri-implant mucosal levels (PML), and facial bone thickness (FBT).

Methods: Twenty-four surgical sites in the maxillary anterior region presented with type II socket defects received immediate implants and simultaneous bone grafting with either a collagen plug soaked in blood, demineralized bone matrix Grafton, or a particulate mixture of 2/3 autogenous bone chips and 1/3 deproteinized bovine bone mineral MinerOss X. The outcome measures were evaluated at 6 and 12 months. The study was registered on www.

Clinicaltrial: gov (12/07/2021 - ID: NCT04957654).

Results: Twenty-two cases (91.6%) showed a total PES score of > 10, without a significant difference between all groups. The vertical height soft tissue changes showed significant improvement in the Collagen plug and Grafton groups at 6 and 12 months, while MinerOss X showed no significant difference at 6 and 12 months compared to baseline. Radiographically, FBT was 0.72 ± 0.20, 0.44 ± 0.12, and 0.95 ± 0.37 at baseline, which significantly increased to 1.61 ± 0.88, 1.48 ± 1.20 and 2.31 ± 0.86 at 12 months for all three groups, respectively.

Conclusion: The use of a particulate bone graft mixture significantly increases the FBT compared to collagen plugs and DBM-Grafton when performing VST during immediate implant placement in compromised Class II extraction sockets.

References

Pallesen L, Schou S, Aaboe M, Hjorting-Hansen E, Nattestad A, Melsen F . Influence of particle size of autogenous bone grafts on the early stages of bone regeneration: a histologic and stereologic study in rabbit calvarium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17(4):498-506. View

Khan S, Cammisa Jr F, Sandhu H, Diwan A, Girardi F, Lane J . The biology of bone grafting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005; 13(1):77-86. View

Chen S, Buser D . Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24 Suppl:186-217. View

Th Elaskary A, Gaweesh Y, El Tantawi M, Maebed M . Vestibular Socket Therapy: A Novel Approach for Implant Placement in Defective Fresh Extraction Sockets With or Without Active Socket Infection (One-Arm Cohort Study). Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021; 36(1):146-153. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.8732. View

Martin Jr G, Boden S, Titus L, Scarborough N . New formulations of demineralized bone matrix as a more effective graft alternative in experimental posterolateral lumbar spine arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24(7):637-45. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199904010-00005. View

Scarborough N, White E, Hughes J, Manrique A, Poser J . Allograft safety: viral inactivation with bone demineralization. Contemp Orthop. 1995; 31(4):257-61. View

Miron R, Hedbom E, Saulacic N, Zhang Y, Sculean A, Bosshardt D . Osteogenic potential of autogenous bone grafts harvested with four different surgical techniques. J Dent Res. 2011; 90(12):1428-33. DOI: 10.1177/0022034511422718. View

Buser D, Bornstein M, Weber H, Grutter L, Schmid B, Belser U . Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 subjects with a 2- to 4-year follow-up. J Periodontol. 2008; 79(9):1773-81. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2008.080071. View

Lee C, Sanz-Miralles E, Zhu L, Glick J, Heath A, Stoupel J . Predicting bone and soft tissue alterations of immediate implant sites in the esthetic zone using clinical parameters. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020; 22(3):325-332. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12910. View

10.

Gharpure A, Bhatavadekar N . Current Evidence on the Socket-Shield Technique: A Systematic Review. J Oral Implantol. 2017; 43(5):395-403. DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00118. View

11.

Bakkali S, Rizo-Gorrita M, Romero-Ruiz M, Gutierrez-Perez J, Torres-Lagares D, Serrera-Figallo M . Efficacy of different surgical techniques for peri-implant tissue preservation in immediate implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25(4):1655-1675. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03794-y. View

12.

Blanco J, Carral C, Argibay O, Linares A . Implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. Periodontol 2000. 2019; 79(1):151-167. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12253. View

13.

Araujo M, Lindhe J . Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32(2):212-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x. View

14.

Ruales-Carrera E, Pauletto P, Apaza-Bedoya K, Volpato C, Ozcan M, Benfatti C . Peri-implant tissue management after immediate implant placement using a customized healing abutment. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 31(6):533-541. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12512. View

15.

Ortega-Martinez J, Perez-Pascual T, Mareque-Bueno S, Hernandez-Alfaro F, Ferres-Padro E . Immediate implants following tooth extraction. A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011; 17(2):e251-61. PMC: 3448306. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.17469. View

16.

Politis C, Schoenaers J, Jacobs R, Agbaje J . Wound Healing Problems in the Mouth. Front Physiol. 2016; 7:507. PMC: 5089986. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00507. View

17.

Grabowski G, Cornett C . Bone graft and bone graft substitutes in spine surgery: current concepts and controversies. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013; 21(1):51-60. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-21-01-51. View

18.

Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G . Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16(6):639-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x. View

19.

Covani U, Cornelini R, Barone A . Bucco-lingual bone remodeling around implants placed into immediate extraction sockets: a case series. J Periodontol. 2003; 74(2):268-73. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.2.268. View

20.

Araujo M, Silva C, Misawa M, Sukekava F . Alveolar socket healing: what can we learn?. Periodontol 2000. 2015; 68(1):122-34. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12082. View