» Articles » PMID: 37655550

Adapted Feeding Strategies in Fed-batch Fermentation Improve Sugar Delivery and Ethanol Productivity

Overview
Journal Bioengineered
Date 2023 Sep 1
PMID 37655550
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bioethanol is a renewable fuel widely used in road transportation and is generally regarded as a clean energy source. Although fermentation is one of the major processes in bioethanol production, studies on improving its efficiency through operational design are limited, especially compared to other steps (pretreatment and hydrolysis/saccharification). In this study, two adapted feeding strategies, in which feed medium addition (sugar delivery) was adjusted to increase the supply of fermentable sugar, were developed to improve ethanol productivity in 5-L fed-batch fermentation by . Specifically, a linear adapted feeding strategy was established based on changes in cell biomass, and an exponential adapted feeding strategy was developed based on cell biomass accumulation. By implementing these two feeding strategies, the overall ethanol productivity reached 0.880.04 and 0.870.06 g/L/h, respectively. This corresponded to ~20% increases in ethanol productivity compared to fixed pulsed feeding operations. Additionally, there was no residual glucose at the end of fermentation, and final ethanol content reached 953 g/L under the linear adapted operation and 1043 g/L under the exponential adapted feeding strategy. No statistical difference was observed in the overall ethanol yield (ethanol-to-sugar ratio) between fixed and adapted feeding strategies (~91%). These results demonstrate that sugar delivery controlled by adapted feeding strategies was more efficient than fixed feeding operations, leading to higher ethanol productivity. Overall, this study provides novel adapted feeding strategies to improve sugar delivery and ethanol productivity. Integration into the current practices of the ethanol industry could improve productivity and reduce production costs of fermentation processes.

Citing Articles

An adaptive, continuous substrate feeding strategy based on evolved gas to improve fed-batch ethanol fermentation.

Hung Y, Sauvageau D, Bressler D Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2025; 109(1):64.

PMID: 40072598 PMC: 11903602. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-025-13447-9.


Optimization of erythritol production through fermentation using molasses as carbon source.

Kembaren R, Parikesit A, Nataniel J, Dharmawan N, Dungus C, Angelique P Acta Biochim Pol. 2025; 71():14000.

PMID: 39845101 PMC: 11750574. DOI: 10.3389/abp.2024.14000.

References
1.
Siriwong T, Laimeheriwa B, Aini U, Cahyanto M, Reungsang A, Salakkam A . Cold hydrolysis of cassava pulp and its use in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) process for ethanol fermentation. J Biotechnol. 2019; 292:57-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.01.003. View

2.
Wang J, Chae M, Bressler D, Sauvageau D . Improved bioethanol productivity through gas flow rate-driven self-cycling fermentation. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020; 13:14. PMC: 6979077. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-020-1658-6. View

3.
Mohd Azhar S, Abdulla R, Jambo S, Marbawi H, Gansau J, Faik A . Yeasts in sustainable bioethanol production: A review. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2017; 10:52-61. PMC: 5637245. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.03.003. View

4.
Pinto A, Pereira S, Ribeiro M, Farinas C . Monitoring of the cellulosic ethanol fermentation process by near-infrared spectroscopy. Bioresour Technol. 2016; 203:334-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.069. View

5.
Veale E, Irudayaraj J, Demirci A . An on-line approach to monitor ethanol fermentation using FTIR spectroscopy. Biotechnol Prog. 2007; 23(2):494-500. DOI: 10.1021/bp060306v. View