Yeasts in Sustainable Bioethanol Production: A Review

Overview

Journal Biochem Biophys Rep

Specialty Biochemistry

Date 2017 Nov 9

PMID 29114570

Citations 112

Authors

Siti Hajar Mohd Azhar

Rahmath Abdulla

Siti Azmah Jambo

Hartinie Marbawi

Jualang Azlan Gansau

Ainol Azifa Mohd Faik

Kenneth Francis Rodrigues

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Bioethanol has been identified as the mostly used biofuel worldwide since it significantly contributes to the reduction of crude oil consumption and environmental pollution. It can be produced from various types of feedstocks such as sucrose, starch, lignocellulosic and algal biomass through fermentation process by microorganisms. Compared to other types of microoganisms, yeasts especially is the common microbes employed in ethanol production due to its high ethanol productivity, high ethanol tolerance and ability of fermenting wide range of sugars. However, there are some challenges in yeast fermentation which inhibit ethanol production such as high temperature, high ethanol concentration and the ability to ferment pentose sugars. Various types of yeast strains have been used in fermentation for ethanol production including hybrid, recombinant and wild-type yeasts. Yeasts can directly ferment simple sugars into ethanol while other type of feedstocks must be converted to fermentable sugars before it can be fermented to ethanol. The common processes involves in ethanol production are pretreatment, hydrolysis and fermentation. Production of bioethanol during fermentation depends on several factors such as temperature, sugar concentration, pH, fermentation time, agitation rate, and inoculum size. The efficiency and productivity of ethanol can be enhanced by immobilizing the yeast cells. This review highlights the different types of yeast strains, fermentation process, factors affecting bioethanol production and immobilization of yeasts for better bioethanol production.

Citing Articles

An adaptive, continuous substrate feeding strategy based on evolved gas to improve fed-batch ethanol fermentation.

Hung Y, Sauvageau D, Bressler D Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2025; 109(1):64.

PMID: 40072598 PMC: 11903602. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-025-13447-9.

Response mechanism of ethanol-tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain ES-42 to increased ethanol during continuous ethanol fermentation.

Ji X, Zhang Q, Yang B, Song Q, Sun Z, Xie C Microb Cell Fact. 2025; 24(1):33.

PMID: 39885572 PMC: 11780993. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-025-02663-7.

Evaluation of Stress Tolerance and Fermentation Performance in Commercial Yeast Strains for Industrial Applications.

Chen A, Si Q, Xu Q, Pan C, Qu T, Chen J Foods. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39796432 PMC: 11720210. DOI: 10.3390/foods14010142.

Concatenating Microbial, Enzymatic, and Organometallic Catalysis for Integrated Conversion of Renewable Carbon Sources.

Klos N, Osterthun O, Mengers H, Lanzerath P, Graf von Westarp W, Lim G JACS Au. 2024; 4(12):4546-4570.

PMID: 39735920 PMC: 11672146. DOI: 10.1021/jacsau.4c00511.

pH-FISH: coupled microscale analysis of microbial identity and acid-base metabolism in complex biofilm samples.

Del Rey Y, Kitzinger K, Lund M, Schramm A, Meyer R, Wagner M Microbiome. 2024; 12(1):266.

PMID: 39707459 PMC: 11662800. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-024-01977-9.

References

Choi G, Um H, Kim M, Kim Y, Kang H, Chung B . Isolation and characterization of ethanol-producing Schizosaccharomyces pombe CHFY0201. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010; 20(4):828-34. View

Bennetzen J, Hall B . The primary structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene for alcohol dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem. 1982; 257(6):3018-25. View

Alper H, Moxley J, Nevoigt E, Fink G, Stephanopoulos G . Engineering yeast transcription machinery for improved ethanol tolerance and production. Science. 2006; 314(5805):1565-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1131969. View

Wang G, Pan X, Zhu J, Gleisner R, Rockwood D . Sulfite pretreatment to overcome recalcitrance of lignocellulose (SPORL) for robust enzymatic saccharification of hardwoods. Biotechnol Prog. 2009; 25(4):1086-93. DOI: 10.1002/btpr.206. View

Domingues L, Lima N, Teixeira J . Contamination of a high-cell-density continuous bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2000; 68(5):584-7. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0290(20000605)68:5<584::aid-bit14>3.0.co;2-1. View

Postma E, Verduyn C, Scheffers W, van Dijken J . Enzymic analysis of the crabtree effect in glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989; 55(2):468-77. PMC: 184133. DOI: 10.1128/aem.55.2.468-477.1989. View

Raj S, Ramaswamy S, Plapp B . Yeast alcohol dehydrogenase structure and catalysis. Biochemistry. 2014; 53(36):5791-803. PMC: 4165444. DOI: 10.1021/bi5006442. View

Laopaiboon L, Laopaiboon P . Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice in repeated-batch fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae immobilized on corncob. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012; 28(2):559-66. DOI: 10.1007/s11274-011-0848-6. View

Alvira P, Tomas-Pejo E, Ballesteros M, Negro M . Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: A review. Bioresour Technol. 2010; 101(13):4851-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.093. View

10.

Watanabe I, Miyata N, Ando A, Shiroma R, Tokuyasu K, Nakamura T . Ethanol production by repeated-batch simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of alkali-treated rice straw using immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Bioresour Technol. 2012; 123:695-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.07.052. View

11.

Taherzadeh M, Karimi K . Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. Int J Mol Sci. 2009; 9(9):1621-1651. PMC: 2635757. DOI: 10.3390/ijms9091621. View

12.

Yang X, Lee J, Yoo H, Shin H, Thapa L, Park C . Production of bioethanol and biodiesel using instant noodle waste. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2014; 37(8):1627-35. DOI: 10.1007/s00449-014-1135-3. View

13.

Fonseca G, Heinzle E, Wittmann C, Gombert A . The yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus and its biotechnological potential. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008; 79(3):339-54. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-008-1458-6. View

14.

Liu R, Shen F . Impacts of main factors on bioethanol fermentation from stalk juice of sweet sorghum by immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae (CICC 1308). Bioresour Technol. 2007; 99(4):847-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.009. View

15.

Li H, Kim N, Jiang M, Kang J, Chang H . Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of lignocellulosic residues pretreated with phosphoric acid-acetone for bioethanol production. Bioresour Technol. 2009; 100(13):3245-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.01.021. View

16.

Liang L, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Zhu M, Liang S, Huang Y . Study of sugarcane pieces as yeast supports for ethanol production from sugarcane juice and molasses. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008; 35(12):1605-13. DOI: 10.1007/s10295-008-0404-z. View

17.

Nuwamanya E, Chiwona-Karltun L, Kawuki R, Baguma Y . Bio-ethanol production from non-food parts of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Ambio. 2012; 41(3):262-70. PMC: 3357848. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-011-0183-z. View

18.

Matsushika A, Inoue H, Kodaki T, Sawayama S . Ethanol production from xylose in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009; 84(1):37-53. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-009-2101-x. View

19.

Canilha L, Chandel A, Dos Santos Milessi T, Antunes F, da Costa Freitas W, Felipe M . Bioconversion of sugarcane biomass into ethanol: an overview about composition, pretreatment methods, detoxification of hydrolysates, enzymatic saccharification, and ethanol fermentation. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012; 2012:989572. PMC: 3516358. DOI: 10.1155/2012/989572. View

20.

Cot M, Loret M, Francois J, Benbadis L . Physiological behaviour of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in aerated fed-batch fermentation for high level production of bioethanol. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006; 7(1):22-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00152.x. View