» Articles » PMID: 37649640

Improved Representation of the Global Dust Cycle Using Observational Constraints on Dust Properties and Abundance

Abstract

Even though desert dust is the most abundant aerosol by mass in Earth's atmosphere, atmospheric models struggle to accurately represent its spatial and temporal distribution. These model errors are partially caused by fundamental difficulties in simulating dust emission in coarse-resolution models and in accurately representing dust microphysical properties. Here we mitigate these problems by developing a new methodology that yields an improved representation of the global dust cycle. We present an analytical framework that uses inverse modeling to integrate an ensemble of global model simulations with observational constraints on the dust size distribution, extinction efficiency, and regional dust aerosol optical depth. We then compare the inverse model results against independent measurements of dust surface concentration and deposition flux and find that errors are reduced by approximately a factor of two relative to current model simulations of the Northern Hemisphere dust cycle. The inverse model results show smaller improvements in the less dusty Southern Hemisphere, most likely because both the model simulations and the observational constraints used in the inverse model are less accurate. On a global basis, we find that the emission flux of dust with geometric diameter up to 20 μm (PM) is approximately 5,000 Tg/year, which is greater than most models account for. This larger PM dust flux is needed to match observational constraints showing a large atmospheric loading of coarse dust. We obtain gridded data sets of dust emission, vertically integrated loading, dust aerosol optical depth, (surface) concentration, and wet and dry deposition fluxes that are resolved by season and particle size. As our results indicate that this data set is more accurate than current model simulations and the MERRA-2 dust reanalysis product, it can be used to improve quantifications of dust impacts on the Earth system.

Citing Articles

The climate change-pollution-aerobiome nexus: A 'systems thinking' mini-review.

Robinson J, Liddicoat C, Sun X, Ramesh S, Hawken S, Lee K Microb Biotechnol. 2024; 17(10):e70018.

PMID: 39401032 PMC: 11472731. DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.70018.


Dust events characterization from visibility, trends and Dust Adversity Index in the Canary Islands for the period 1980-2022.

Suarez-Molina D, Cuevas E, Alonso-Perez S, Cana L, Montero G, Oliver A Heliyon. 2024; 10(10):e31262.

PMID: 38818210 PMC: 11137399. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31262.


Dust Under the Radar: Rethinking How to Evaluate the Impacts of Dust Events on Air Quality in the United States.

Ardon-Dryer K, Clifford K, Hand J Geohealth. 2023; 7(12):e2023GH000953.

PMID: 38077290 PMC: 10704398. DOI: 10.1029/2023GH000953.


Improved representation of the global dust cycle using observational constraints on dust properties and abundance.

Kok J, Adebiyi A, Albani S, Balkanski Y, Checa-Garcia R, Chin M Atmos Chem Phys. 2023; 21(10):8127-8167.

PMID: 37649640 PMC: 10466066. DOI: 10.5194/acp-21-8127-2021.


Dithiothreitol-Measured Oxidative Potential of Reference Materials of Mineral Dust: Implications for the Toxicity of Mineral Dust Aerosols in the Atmosphere.

Nishita-Hara C, Kobayashi H, Hara K, Hayashi M Geohealth. 2023; 7(7):e2022GH000736.

PMID: 37426691 PMC: 10326488. DOI: 10.1029/2022GH000736.


References
1.
Adebiyi A, Kok J . Climate models miss most of the coarse dust in the atmosphere. Sci Adv. 2020; 6(15):eaaz9507. PMC: 7141824. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz9507. View

2.
Evan A, Flamant C, Gaetani M, Guichard F . The past, present and future of African dust. Nature. 2016; 531(7595):493-5. DOI: 10.1038/nature17149. View

3.
Perez Garcia-Pando C, Miller R, Perlwitz J, Rodriguez S, Prospero J . Predicting the mineral composition of dust aerosols: Insights from elemental composition measured at the Izaña Observatory. Geophys Res Lett. 2020; 43(19):10520-10529. PMC: 7370996. DOI: 10.1002/2016gl069873. View

4.
Buchard V, Randles C, da Silva A, Darmenov A, Colarco P, Govindaraju R . The MERRA-2 Aerosol Reanalysis, 1980 Onward. Part II: Evaluation and Case Studies. J Clim. 2020; 30(17):6851-6872. PMC: 7477811. DOI: 10.1175/jcli-d-16-0613.1. View

5.
Kok J, Ridley D, Zhou Q, Miller R, Zhao C, Heald C . Integrative analysis of desert dust size and abundance suggests less dust climate cooling. Nat Geosci. 2020; 10:274-278. PMC: 7398272. DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2912. View