» Articles » PMID: 37644811

A Functional Connectome-Based Neural Signature for Individualized Prediction of Antipsychotic Response in First-Episode Psychosis

Overview
Journal Am J Psychiatry
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2023 Aug 30
PMID 37644811
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Identification of robust biomarkers that predict individualized response to antipsychotic treatment at the early stage of psychotic disorders remains a challenge in precision psychiatry. The aim of this study was to investigate whether any functional connectome-based neural traits could serve as such a biomarker.

Methods: In a discovery sample, 49 patients with first-episode psychosis received multi-paradigm fMRI scans at baseline and were clinically followed up for 12 weeks under antipsychotic monotherapies. Treatment response was evaluated at the individual level based on the psychosis score of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Cross-paradigm connectivity and connectome-based predictive modeling were employed to train a predictive model that uses baseline connectomic measures to predict individualized change rates of psychosis scores, with model performance evaluated as the Pearson correlations between the predicted change rates and the observed change rates, based on cross-validation. The model generalizability was further examined in an independent validation sample of 24 patients in a similar design.

Results: The results revealed a paradigm-independent connectomic trait that significantly predicted individualized treatment outcome in both the discovery sample (predicted-versus-observed r=0.41) and the validation sample (predicted-versus-observed r=0.47, mean squared error=0.019). Features that positively predicted psychosis change rates primarily involved connections related to the cerebellar-cortical circuitry, and features that negatively predicted psychosis change rates were chiefly connections within the cortical cognitive systems.

Conclusions: This study discovers and validates a connectome-based functional signature as a promising early predictor for individualized response to antipsychotic treatment in first-episode psychosis, thus highlighting the potential clinical value of this biomarker in precision psychiatry.

Citing Articles

Biomarker discovery using machine learning in the psychosis spectrum.

Yassin W, Loedige K, Wannan C, Holton K, Chevinsky J, Torous J Biomark Neuropsychiatry. 2024; 11.

PMID: 39687745 PMC: 11649307. DOI: 10.1016/j.bionps.2024.100107.


Baseline symptom-related white matter tracts predict individualized treatment response to 12-week antipsychotic monotherapies in first-episode schizophrenia.

Chen Y, Liu S, Zhang B, Zhao G, Zhang Z, Li S Transl Psychiatry. 2024; 14(1):23.

PMID: 38218952 PMC: 10787827. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-023-02714-w.

References
1.
Hadley J, Nenert R, Kraguljac N, Bolding M, White D, Skidmore F . Ventral tegmental area/midbrain functional connectivity and response to antipsychotic medication in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013; 39(4):1020-30. PMC: 3924537. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2013.305. View

2.
Chan N, Kim J, Shah P, Brown E, Plitman E, Carravaggio F . Resting-state functional connectivity in treatment response and resistance in schizophrenia: A systematic review. Schizophr Res. 2019; 211:10-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.07.020. View

3.
Cole D, Beckmann C, Oei N, Both S, van Gerven J, Rombouts S . Differential and distributed effects of dopamine neuromodulations on resting-state network connectivity. Neuroimage. 2013; 78:59-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.034. View

4.
Nawaz U, Lee I, Beermann A, Eack S, Keshavan M, Brady R . Individual Variation in Functional Brain Network Topography is Linked to Schizophrenia Symptomatology. Schizophr Bull. 2020; 47(1):180-188. PMC: 7824998. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa088. View

5.
Mehta U, Ibrahim F, Sharma M, Venkatasubramanian G, Thirthalli J, Bharath R . Resting-state functional connectivity predictors of treatment response in schizophrenia - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Res. 2021; 237:153-165. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.09.004. View