» Articles » PMID: 37627389

Postmortem Metabolism and Pork Quality Development Are Affected by Electrical Stimulation Across Three Genetic Lines

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2023 Aug 26
PMID 37627389
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Variations in postmortem metabolism in muscle impact pork quality development. Curiously, some genetic lines are more refractile to adverse pork quality development than others and may regulate energy metabolism differently. The aim of this study was to challenge pork carcasses from different genetic populations with electrical stimulation (ES) to determine how postmortem metabolism varies with genetic line and explore control points that reside in glycolysis in dying muscle. Three genetic populations (GP) were subjected to ES (100 V or 200 V, 13 pulses, 2 s on/2 s off) at 15- or 25-min post-exsanguination, or no stimulation (NS). Genetic population affected relative muscle relative abundance of different myosin heavy chains, glycogen, G6P, and lactate concentrations. Genetic lines responded similarly to ES, but a comparison of ES treatment groups revealed a trend for an interaction between voltage, time of ES, and time postmortem. Higher voltage accelerated pH decline at 20 min up to 60 min postmortem. Trends in color and firmness scores and L* values were consistent with pH and metabolite data. These data show that genetic populations respond differently to postmortem perturbation by altering glycolytic flux and suggest differences in postmortem glycolysis may be partially responsible for differences in meat quality between genetic populations, though not entirely.

Citing Articles

Skeletal muscle metabolic characteristics and fresh meat quality defects associated with wooden breast.

Rimmer L, Zumbaugh M Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1501362.

PMID: 39539953 PMC: 11557563. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1501362.

References
1.
Taylor A, Martoccia L . The effect of low voltage and high voltageelectrical stimulation on pork quality. Meat Sci. 2011; 39(3):319-26. DOI: 10.1016/0309-1740(94)00022-y. View

2.
Rosenvold K, Andersen H . Factors of significance for pork quality-a review. Meat Sci. 2011; 64(3):219-37. DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00186-9. View

3.
Knox B, van Laack R, Davidson P . Relationships between ultimate pH and microbial, chemical, and physical characteristics of vacuum-packaged pork loins. J Food Sci. 2008; 73(3):M104-10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00667.x. View

4.
Joo S, Kauffman R, Kim B, Park G . The relationship of sarcoplasmic and myofibrillar protein solubility to colour and water-holding capacity in porcine longissimus muscle. Meat Sci. 2011; 52(3):291-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0309-1740(99)00005-4. View

5.
Dalrymple R, Hamm R . Postmorten glycolysis in ground skeletal muscle as influenced by prerigor freezing and subsequent thawing. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch. 1975; 158(6):333-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF01787077. View