» Articles » PMID: 37627133

Comparative Assessment of Different Ultrasound Technologies in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Aug 26
PMID 37627133
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study aimed to assess the diagnostic test accuracy of different ultrasound scanning technologies in the detection of prostate cancer. A systematic search was conducted using the Cochrane Guidelines for Screening and Diagnostic Tests. We performed a systematic search in the international databases PubMed, Medline, Ovid, Embase and Cochrane Library. Searches were designed to find all studies that evaluated Micro-US, mpUS, SWE and CEUS as the main detection modalities for prostate cancer. This study was registered with Research Registry of systematic review and meta-analysis. The QUADAS-2 tool was utilized to perform quality assessment and bias analysis. The literature search generated 1376 studies. Of these, 320 studies were screened for eligibility, with 1056 studies being excluded. Overall, 26 studies with a total of 6370 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity for grayscale, CEUS, SWE, Micro-US and mpUS modalities were 0.66 (95% CI 0.54-0.73) 0.73 (95% CI 0.58-0.88), 0.82 (95% CI 0.75-0.90), 0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.94) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.71-1.03), respectively. Moreover, the pooled specificity for grayscale, CEUS, SWE, Micro-US and mpUS modalities were 0.56 (95% CI 0.21-0.90), 0.78 (95% CI 0.67-0.88), 0.76 (95% CI 0.65-0.88), 0.43 (95% CI 0.28-0.59) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.54-0.81), respectively. In terms of sensitivity, substantial heterogeneity between studies was detected (I = 72%, = 0.000 < 0.05). In relation to specificity, extreme heterogeneity was detected (I = 93%, = 0.000 < 0.05). Some studies proved that advanced ultrasound modalities such as mpUS, Micro-US, shear-wave elastography, contrast enhanced and micro-ultrasound are promising methods for the detection of prostate cancer.

Citing Articles

Application of mean maximum Young's modulus value as a new parameter for differential diagnosis of prostate diseases.

Huang N, Cao X, Li Z, Wang H, Zhao W, Shi J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3832.

PMID: 39885288 PMC: 11782497. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88263-2.


A Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA)-Based Phantom for Prostate Cancer Detection Using Multiparametric Ultrasound: A Validation Study.

Jawli A, Nabi G, Huang Z Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(11).

PMID: 39593712 PMC: 11591372. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11111052.


Research on the mean maximum Young's modulus value as a new diagnostic parameter for prostate cancer.

Duan J, Liu Z, Li Z, Wang H, Zhao W Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16828.

PMID: 39039192 PMC: 11263570. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68036-z.


The Performance of Different Parametric Ultrasounds in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimens.

Jawli A, Nabi G, Huang Z Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(8).

PMID: 38672584 PMC: 11047975. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081502.

References
1.
Sano F, Uemura H . The utility and limitations of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Sensors (Basel). 2015; 15(3):4947-57. PMC: 4435116. DOI: 10.3390/s150304947. View

2.
Wei C, Li C, Szewczyk-Bieda M, Upreti D, Lang S, Huang Z . Performance Characteristics of Transrectal Shear Wave Elastography Imaging in the Evaluation of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Study. J Urol. 2018; 200(3):549-558. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.03.116. View

3.
Woo S, Suh C, Kim S, Cho J, Kim S . Shear-Wave Elastography for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017; 209(4):806-814. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.17.18056. View

4.
Sarkar S, Das S . A Review of Imaging Methods for Prostate Cancer Detection. Biomed Eng Comput Biol. 2016; 7(Suppl 1):1-15. PMC: 4777886. DOI: 10.4137/BECB.S34255. View

5.
Boehm K, Salomon G, Beyer B, Schiffmann J, Simonis K, Graefen M . Shear wave elastography for localization of prostate cancer lesions and assessment of elasticity thresholds: implications for targeted biopsies and active surveillance protocols. J Urol. 2014; 193(3):794-800. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.100. View