» Articles » PMID: 37611107

Measuring Utility with Diffusion Models

Overview
Journal Sci Adv
Specialties Biology
Science
Date 2023 Aug 23
PMID 37611107
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The drift diffusion model (DDM) is a prominent account of how people make decisions. Many of these decisions involve comparing two alternatives based on differences of perceived stimulus magnitudes, such as economic values. Here, we propose a consistent estimator for the parameters of a DDM in such cases. This estimator allows us to derive decision thresholds, drift rates, and subjective percepts (i.e., utilities in economic choice) directly from the experimental data. This eliminates the need to measure these values separately or to assume specific functional forms for them. Our method also allows one to predict drift rates for comparisons that did not occur in the dataset. We apply the method to two datasets, one comparing probabilities of earning a fixed reward and one comparing objects of variable reward value. Our analysis indicates that both datasets conform well to the DDM. We find that utilities are linear in probability and slightly convex in reward.

References
1.
Zhao W, Diederich A, Trueblood J, Bhatia S . Automatic biases in intertemporal choice. Psychon Bull Rev. 2019; 26(2):661-668. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01579-9. View

2.
Gluth S, Meiran N . Leave-One-Trial-Out, LOTO, a general approach to link single-trial parameters of cognitive models to neural data. Elife. 2019; 8. PMC: 6392499. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.42607. View

3.
Smith S, Krajbich I . Mental representations distinguish value-based decisions from perceptual decisions. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021; 28(4):1413-1422. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01911-2. View

4.
Krajbich I, Armel C, Rangel A . Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. Nat Neurosci. 2010; 13(10):1292-8. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2635. View

5.
Tajima S, Drugowitsch J, Pouget A . Optimal policy for value-based decision-making. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:12400. PMC: 4992126. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12400. View