» Articles » PMID: 23507394

The Valuation System: a Coordinate-based Meta-analysis of BOLD FMRI Experiments Examining Neural Correlates of Subjective Value

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2013 Mar 20
PMID 23507394
Citations 811
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Numerous experiments have recently sought to identify neural signals associated with the subjective value (SV) of choice alternatives. Theoretically, SV assessment is an intermediate computational step during decision making, in which alternatives are placed on a common scale to facilitate value-maximizing choice. Here we present a quantitative, coordinate-based meta-analysis of 206 published fMRI studies investigating neural correlates of SV. Our results identify two general patterns of SV-correlated brain responses. In one set of regions, both positive and negative effects of SV on BOLD are reported at above-chance rates across the literature. Areas exhibiting this pattern include anterior insula, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, dorsal and posterior striatum, and thalamus. The mixture of positive and negative effects potentially reflects an underlying U-shaped function, indicative of signal related to arousal or salience. In a second set of areas, including ventromedial prefrontal cortex and anterior ventral striatum, positive effects predominate. Positive effects in the latter regions are seen both when a decision is confronted and when an outcome is delivered, as well as for both monetary and primary rewards. These regions appear to constitute a "valuation system," carrying a domain-general SV signal and potentially contributing to value-based decision making.

Citing Articles

A technology-based randomized controlled trial of self-affirmation and gain-framed health messaging to reduce sedentary behavior in older adults.

Ai M, Thovinakere N, Walker C, Ordway C, Quinonez E, Melsky E medRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40034793 PMC: 11875261. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.18.25322482.


What do we actually want to experience? A computational metric for assessing reward values.

Waugh C, Porth A, Fang X, Sands L, Kishida K Res Sq. 2025; .

PMID: 40034432 PMC: 11875320. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5875678/v1.


A Computational Analysis of the Effect of Hard Choices on the Individuation of Values.

Grzywacz N Brain Sci. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40002464 PMC: 11852614. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15020131.


Neural correlates of the non-optimal price: an MEG/EEG study.

Gorin A, Kuznetsova E, Kislov A, Levchenko E, Klucharev V, Moiseeva V Front Hum Neurosci. 2025; 19:1470662.

PMID: 39935680 PMC: 11811784. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1470662.


Value signals guiding choices for cannabis versus non-drug rewards in people who use cannabis near-daily.

Lawn W, Hao X, Konova A, Haney M, Cooper Z, Van Dam N Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025; 242(4):681-691.

PMID: 39928130 PMC: 11890362. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-025-06746-6.


References
1.
Yarkoni T, Poldrack R, Van Essen D, Wager T . Cognitive neuroscience 2.0: building a cumulative science of human brain function. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010; 14(11):489-96. PMC: 2963679. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.004. View

2.
Wager T, Lindquist M, Kaplan L . Meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging data: current and future directions. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2008; 2(2):150-8. PMC: 2555451. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsm015. View

3.
Monosov I, Hikosaka O . Regionally distinct processing of rewards and punishments by the primate ventromedial prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci. 2012; 32(30):10318-30. PMC: 3438659. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1801-12.2012. View

4.
Levita L, Hare T, Voss H, Glover G, Ballon D, Casey B . The bivalent side of the nucleus accumbens. Neuroimage. 2008; 44(3):1178-87. PMC: 2659952. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.039. View

5.
Knutson B, Rick S, Wimmer G, Prelec D, Loewenstein G . Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron. 2007; 53(1):147-56. PMC: 1876732. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.010. View