» Articles » PMID: 37601746

Choice, Control, and Animal Welfare: Definitions and Essential Inquiries to Advance Animal Welfare Science

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2023 Aug 21
PMID 37601746
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ways in which humans can support good welfare for animals in their care is an ongoing subject of debate: some place emphasis on the animals' physical health; others, on animals' ability to live "natural lives"; and others on animals' affective states or psychological wellbeing. Recently, there has been an increase in interest in how an animal's ability to exercise control over its environment could impact their welfare. In this article, we take the stance that the relevant aspects of the first two concepts of animal welfare (physical health, natural lives) are largely addressed when an animal's psychological wellbeing is prioritized. Through that lens, we review the current state of the literature regarding the psychology of control, and the intersection between choice, control, and welfare. We clarify terms to support future work, and propose future directions that could lead to a better understanding of the psychological benefits of choice and control and ultimately inform animal care decisions.

Citing Articles

Outdoor access versus conventional broiler chicken production: Updated review of animal welfare, food safety, and meat quality.

Campbell Y, Walker L, Bartz B, Eckberg J, Pullin A Poult Sci. 2025; 104(4):104906.

PMID: 39985895 PMC: 11904540. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.104906.


Animal Welfare, Agency, and Animal-Computer Interaction.

Browning H, Veit W Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(2.

PMID: 39858219 PMC: 11758648. DOI: 10.3390/ani15020219.


A consensus on the definition of positive animal welfare.

Rault J, Bateson M, Boissy A, Forkman B, Grinde B, Gygax L Biol Lett. 2025; 21(1):20240382.

PMID: 39837489 PMC: 11883819. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0382.


Do Cockatiels Choose Their Favourite Tunes? Use of Touchscreen for Animal Welfare Enhancement and Insights into Musical Preferences.

Le Covec M, Di Stasi R, Aime C, Bouet L, Watanabe S, Bovet D Animals (Basel). 2025; 14(24.

PMID: 39765513 PMC: 11672826. DOI: 10.3390/ani14243609.


Considerations for implementing regulation of decapods in science.

Powell A, Agnalt A, Heasman K, Albalat A Anim Welf. 2024; 33:e55.

PMID: 39703221 PMC: 11655277. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2024.50.


References
1.
Veasey J . In pursuit of peak animal welfare; the need to prioritize the meaningful over the measurable. Zoo Biol. 2017; 36(6):413-425. DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21390. View

2.
Catania A, Sagvolden T . Preference for free choice over forced choice in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980; 34(1):77-86. PMC: 1332946. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-77. View

3.
Kurtycz L, Wagner K, Ross S . The choice to access outdoor areas affects the behavior of great apes. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2014; 17(3):185-97. DOI: 10.1080/10888705.2014.896213. View

4.
Duncan I . Gordon memorial lecture. Poultry welfare: science or subjectivity?. Br Poult Sci. 2003; 43(5 Suppl):643-52. DOI: 10.1080/0007166021000025109. View

5.
Hanson J, Larson M, Snowdon C . The effects of control over high intensity noise on plasma cortisol levels in rhesus monkeys. Behav Biol. 1976; 16(3):333-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6773(76)91460-7. View