PGT-A: Houston, We Have a Problem

Overview

Journal J Assist Reprod Genet

Publisher Springer

Specialties Genetics
Reproductive Medicine

Date 2023 Aug 17

PMID 37589859

Authors

Robert F Casper

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is a common add-on to IVF cycles. As it is presently performed, PGT-A relies on whole genome amplification of small amounts of DNA from cells removed from the trophectoderm (TE) of a blastocyst for determination of gain or loss of chromosomal material by next-generation sequencing. Whole genome amplification may introduce artifacts such as allele dropout and loss of heterozygosity in up to 25% of cases. In addition, the high prevalence of mosaicism in human embryos is a complicating factor in interpreting the results of PGT-A screening. In the presence of mosaicism, biopsy of TE cells cannot provide accurate results regarding the chromosomal make-up of the inner cell mass. The available clinical data suggest that PGT-A is probably harmful when IVF outcomes are analyzed by intention to treat or by live birth rate per cycle started rather than per embryo transfer, especially in women with three or fewer blastocysts. In addition, hypothesized advantages of reduced spontaneous abortion rate and reduced time to conception may be modest at best.

Citing Articles

Does double cryopreservation as well as double biopsy affect embryo viability and clinical outcomes? Evidence from a systematic review of the literature.

Bartolacci A, Vitiello C, de Girolamo S, Papaleo E, Pagliardini L J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 39893354 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-025-03398-5.

PGT-A: what's it for, what's wrong?.

Viville S, Aboulghar M J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; 42(1):63-69.

PMID: 39847200 PMC: 11806166. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-025-03400-0.

The most appropriate indicators of successful ovarian stimulation.

Roque M, Sunkara S Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025; 23(Suppl 1):5.

PMID: 39789602 PMC: 11714799. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01331-6.

Novel embryo selection strategies-finding the right balance.

Polyakov A, Rozen G, Gyngell C, Savulescu J Front Reprod Health. 2024; 5:1287621.

PMID: 38162011 PMC: 10757847. DOI: 10.3389/frph.2023.1287621.

References

Munne S, Magli C, Cohen J, Morton P, Sadowy S, Gianaroli L . Positive outcome after preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(9):2191-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.9.2191. View

Coonen E, Van Montfoort A, Carvalho F, Kokkali G, Moutou C, Rubio C . ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XVI-XVIII: cycles from 2013 to 2015. Hum Reprod Open. 2020; 2020(4):hoaa043. PMC: 7532546. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa043. View

McCoy R . Mosaicism in Preimplantation Human Embryos: When Chromosomal Abnormalities Are the Norm. Trends Genet. 2017; 33(7):448-463. PMC: 5484399. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2017.04.001. View

Polonis K, Lopes J, Cabral H, Babcock H, Kline L, Ruiz K . Uniparental disomy of multiple chromosomes in two cases with a complex phenotype. Am J Med Genet A. 2023; 191(7):1978-1983. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63224. View

Melado Vidales L, Lawrenz B, Vitorino R, Patel R, Ruiz F, Marqueta Marques L . Clinical and laboratory parameters associated with cycle outcomes in patients undergoing euploid frozen blastocyst transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2023; 46(6):917-925. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.02.014. View

van Echten-Arends J, Mastenbroek S, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Korevaar J, Heineman M, van der Veen F . Chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011; 17(5):620-7. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmr014. View

Patel J, Tan S, Hartshorne G, McAinsh A . Unique geometry of sister kinetochores in human oocytes during meiosis I may explain maternal age-associated increases in chromosomal abnormalities. Biol Open. 2016; 5(2):178-84. PMC: 4823989. DOI: 10.1242/bio.016394. View

Orvieto R, Shimon C, Rienstein S, Jonish-Grossman A, Shani H, Aizer A . Do human embryos have the ability of self-correction?. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020; 18(1):98. PMC: 7539487. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-020-00650-8. View

Munne S, Kaplan B, Frattarelli J, Child T, Nakhuda G, Shamma F . Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2019; 112(6):1071-1079.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346. View

10.

Gu C, Li K, Li R, Li L, Li X, Dai X . Chromosomal Aneuploidy Associated With Clinical Characteristics of Pregnancy Loss. Front Genet. 2021; 12:667697. PMC: 8083898. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.667697. View

11.

Mori R, Hayakawa T, Hirayama M, Ozawa F, Yoshihara H, Goto S . Cervicovaginal microbiome in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss. J Reprod Immunol. 2023; 157:103944. DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2023.103944. View

12.

Liang D, Mikhalchenko A, Ma H, Marti Gutierrez N, Chen T, Lee Y . Limitations of gene editing assessments in human preimplantation embryos. Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):1219. PMC: 9992379. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36820-6. View

13.

Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Korevaar J, Verhoeve H . In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(1):9-17. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa067744. View

14.

Vandevelde A, Gris J, Moore G, Musial J, Zuily S, Wahl D . Added value of antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies in the workup of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies. J Thromb Haemost. 2023; 21(7):1981-1994. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.04.001. View

15.

Diakiw S, Hall J, VerMilyea M, Amin J, Aizpurua J, Giardini L . Development of an artificial intelligence model for predicting the likelihood of human embryo euploidy based on blastocyst images from multiple imaging systems during IVF. Hum Reprod. 2022; 37(8):1746-1759. PMC: 9340116. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac131. View

16.

Mahesan A, Chang P, Ronn R, Paul A, Meriano J, Casper R . Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in patients with low embryo numbers: benefit or harm?. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022; 39(9):2027-2033. PMC: 9474967. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02588-9. View

17.

Yan J, Qin Y, Zhao H, Sun Y, Gong F, Li R . Live Birth with or without Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy. N Engl J Med. 2021; 385(22):2047-2058. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2103613. View

18.

Zhao W, Chen P, Liu X, Li Y, Liang X, Li J . Comparison of aneuploidy rate in spontaneous abortion chorionic villus between D6 and D5 thawed-frozen blastocyst transfer. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):130. PMC: 9972745. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05452-5. View

19.

Bolton H, Graham S, VAN DER Aa N, Kumar P, Theunis K, Fernandez Gallardo E . Mouse model of chromosome mosaicism reveals lineage-specific depletion of aneuploid cells and normal developmental potential. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:11165. PMC: 4820631. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11165. View

20.

Kotzot D . Complex and segmental uniparental disomy (UPD): review and lessons from rare chromosomal complements. J Med Genet. 2001; 38(8):497-507. PMC: 1734925. DOI: 10.1136/jmg.38.8.497. View