No Reduction in Motor-evoked Potential Amplitude During the Rubber Hand Illusion

Overview

Journal Brain Behav

Specialty Psychology

Date 2023 Aug 7

PMID 37548563

Authors

Arran T Reader

Sara Coppi

Victoria S Trifonova

H Henrik Ehrsson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: In the rubber hand illusion (RHI), touches are applied to a fake hand at the same time as touches are applied to a participant's real hand that is hidden in a congruent position. Synchronous (but not asynchronous) tactile stimulation of the two hands may induce the sensation that the fake hand is the participant's own. As such, the illusion is commonly used to examine the sense of body ownership. Some studies indicate that in addition to the subjective experience of limb ownership reported by participants, the RHI can also reduce corticospinal excitability (e.g., as reflected in motor-evoked potential [MEP] amplitude) and alter parietal-motor cortical connectivity in passive participants. These findings have been taken to support a link between motor cortical processing and the subjective experience of body ownership.

Methods: In this study, we tried to replicate the reduction in MEP amplitude associated with the RHI and uncover the components of the illusion that might explain these changes. As such, we used single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to probe the excitability of the corticospinal motor system as participants experienced the RHI.

Results: Despite participants reporting the presence of the illusion and showing shifts in perceived real hand position towards the fake limb supporting its elicitation, we did not observe any associated reduction in MEP amplitude.

Conclusion: We conclude that a reduction in MEP amplitude is not a reliable outcome of the RHI and argue that if such effects do occur, they are unlikely to be large or functionally relevant.

Citing Articles

Body ownership and tactile processing: Effects of bilateral rubber hand illusion on tactile temporal order judgment.

Shibuya S, Ohki Y Iperception. 2024; 15(6):20416695241308146.

PMID: 39735731 PMC: 11672382. DOI: 10.1177/20416695241308146.

Facilitation of imitative movement in patients with chronic hemiplegia triggered by illusory ownership.

Aizu N, Sudo T, Oouchida Y, Izumi S Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):16143.

PMID: 37752335 PMC: 10522677. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43410-5.

No reduction in motor-evoked potential amplitude during the rubber hand illusion.

Reader A, Coppi S, Trifonova V, Ehrsson H Brain Behav. 2023; 13(10):e3211.

PMID: 37548563 PMC: 10570491. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3211.

References

Kammers M, De Vignemont F, Verhagen L, Dijkerman H . The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia. 2008; 47(1):204-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.028. View

Rossi Sebastiano A, Poles K, Miller L, Fossataro C, Milano E, Gindri P . Reach planning with someone else's hand. Cortex. 2022; 153:207-219. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.05.005. View

Bell S, Lauer A, Lench D, Hanlon C . Visual Attention Affects the Amplitude of the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-associated Motor-evoked Potential: A Preliminary Study With Clinical Utility. J Psychiatr Pract. 2018; 24(4):220-229. PMC: 6530802. DOI: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000321. View

Logothetis N, Pauls J, Augath M, Trinath T, Oeltermann A . Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature. 2001; 412(6843):150-7. DOI: 10.1038/35084005. View

Chancel M, Iriye H, Ehrsson H . Causal Inference of Body Ownership in the Posterior Parietal Cortex. J Neurosci. 2022; 42(37):7131-7143. PMC: 9480881. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0656-22.2022. View

Newport R, Preston C . Disownership and disembodiment of the real limb without visuoproprioceptive mismatch. Cogn Neurosci. 2013; 2(3-4):179-85. DOI: 10.1080/17588928.2011.565120. View

Longo M, Schuur F, Kammers M, Tsakiris M, Haggard P . What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition. 2008; 107(3):978-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.004. View

Tidoni E, Grisoni L, Liuzza M, Aglioti S . Rubber hand illusion highlights massive visual capture and sensorimotor face-hand remapping in a tetraplegic man. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014; 32(5):611-22. DOI: 10.3233/RNN-130385. View

Kalckert A, Ehrsson H . The moving rubber hand illusion revisited: comparing movements and visuotactile stimulation to induce illusory ownership. Conscious Cogn. 2014; 26:117-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.02.003. View

10.

Niebauer C, Aselage J, Schutte C . Hemispheric interaction and consciousness: degree of handedness predicts the intensity of a sensory illusion. Laterality. 2004; 7(1):85-96. DOI: 10.1080/13576500143000159. View

11.

Lush P, Botan V, Scott R, Seth A, Ward J, Dienes Z . Trait phenomenological control predicts experience of mirror synaesthesia and the rubber hand illusion. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):4853. PMC: 7519080. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18591-6. View

12.

Reader A, Coppi S, Trifonova V, Ehrsson H . No reduction in motor-evoked potential amplitude during the rubber hand illusion. Brain Behav. 2023; 13(10):e3211. PMC: 10570491. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3211. View

13.

Alaydin H, Cengiz B . Body ownership, sensorimotor integration and motor cortical excitability: A TMS study about rubber hand illusion. Neuropsychologia. 2021; 161:107992. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107992. View

14.

Reader A, Trifonova V, Ehrsson H . Little evidence for an effect of the rubber hand illusion on basic movement. Eur J Neurosci. 2021; 54(7):6463-6486. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15444. View

15.

Kilteni K, Maselli A, Kording K, Slater M . Over my fake body: body ownership illusions for studying the multisensory basis of own-body perception. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015; 9:141. PMC: 4371812. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00141. View

16.

Darling W, Wolf S, Butler A . Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation depends on muscle activation. Exp Brain Res. 2006; 174(2):376-85. PMC: 3582032. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0468-9. View

17.

Golaszewski S, Frey V, Thomschewski A, Sebastianelli L, Versace V, Saltuari L . Neural mechanisms underlying the Rubber Hand Illusion: A systematic review of related neurophysiological studies. Brain Behav. 2021; 11(8):e02124. PMC: 8413782. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2124. View

18.

Ehrsson H, Holmes N, Passingham R . Touching a rubber hand: feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(45):10564-73. PMC: 1395356. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0800-05.2005. View

19.

Niedernhuber M, Barone D, Lenggenhager B . Prostheses as extensions of the body: Progress and challenges. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018; 92:1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.04.020. View

20.

Reader A, Ehrsson H . Weakening the subjective sensation of own hand ownership does not interfere with rapid finger movements. PLoS One. 2019; 14(10):e0223580. PMC: 6777829. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223580. View