» Articles » PMID: 37539486

Perineal Wound Complications After Vertical Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap and Mesh Closure Following Abdominoperineal Surgery and Pelvic Exenteration of Anal and Rectal Cancers: A Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Int Wound J
Date 2023 Aug 4
PMID 37539486
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A meta-analysis research was implemented to appraise the perineal wound complications (PWCs) after vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap and mesh closure (MC) following abdominoperineal surgery (AS) and pelvic exenteration (PE) of anal and rectal cancers. Inclusive literature research till April 2023 was done and 2008 interconnected researches were revised. Of the 20 picked researches, enclosed 2972 AS and PE of anal and rectal cancers persons were in the utilized researchers' starting point, 1216 of them were utilizing VRAM flap, and 1756 were primary closure (PC). Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilized to appraise the consequence of VRAM flap in treating AS and PE of anal and rectal cancers by the dichotomous approach and a fixed or random model. VRAM flap had significantly lower PWCs (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42-0.98, p < 0.001), and major PWCs (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.32-0.80, p = 0.004) compared to PC in AS and PE of anal and rectal cancers persons. However, VRAM flap and PC had no significant difference in minor PWCs (OR, 1; 95% CI, 0.54-1.85, p = 1.00) in AS and PE of anal and rectal cancer persons. VRAM flap had significantly lower PWCs, and major PWCs, however, no significant difference was found in minor PWCs compared to PC in AS and PE of anal and rectal cancers persons. However, caution needs to be taken when interacting with its values since there was a low sample size of most of the chosen research found for the comparisons in the meta-analysis.

References
1.
Chessin D, Hartley J, Cohen A, Mazumdar M, Cordeiro P, Disa J . Rectus flap reconstruction decreases perineal wound complications after pelvic chemoradiation and surgery: a cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005; 12(2):104-10. DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2005.03.100. View

2.
Rutegard M, Rutegard J, Haapamaki M . Multicentre, randomised trial comparing acellular porcine collagen implant versus gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of the pelvic floor after extended abdominoperineal excision of rectum: study protocol for the Nordic Extended.... BMJ Open. 2019; 9(5):e027255. PMC: 6549677. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027255. View

3.
Holm T . Abdominoperineal Excision: Technical Challenges in Optimal Surgical and Oncological Outcomes after Abdominoperineal Excision for Rectal Cancer. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017; 30(5):357-367. PMC: 5703661. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606113. View

4.
Lefevre J, Parc Y, Kerneis S, Shields C, Touboul E, Chaouat M . Abdomino-perineal resection for anal cancer: impact of a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneus flap on survival, recurrence, morbidity, and wound healing. Ann Surg. 2009; 250(5):707-11. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bce334. View

5.
Woodfield J, Hulme-Moir M, Ly J . A comparison of the cost of primary closure or rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap closure of the perineum after abdominoperineal excision. Colorectal Dis. 2017; 19(10):934-941. DOI: 10.1111/codi.13690. View