» Articles » PMID: 37535600

Effect of Veterinary Feed Directive Rule Changes on Tetracycline-resistant and Erythromycin-resistant Bacteria (Salmonella, Escherichia, and Campylobacter) in Retail Meats in the United States

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 Aug 3
PMID 37535600
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria are a growing public health threat. In 2017 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration implemented Veterinary Feed Directive (VFD) rules changes to limit medically important antimicrobial use in food-producing animals, combating antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. The effect of the VFD rule changes on the occurrence of bacteria resistant to medically-important antimicrobials in retail meats is yet to be investigated in the U.S. This study investigates whether the VFD rule changes affected the occurrence of tetracycline-resistant and erythromycin-resistant bacteria (Salmonella, Escherichia, and Campylobacter) in retail meats in the U.S.

Methods: Multivariable mixed effect logistic regression models were used to analyze 2002-2019 retail meats surveillance data from the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) in the U.S. Variables included VFD rule changes, meat type, quarter of year, and raising claims. A potential association between these variables and the occurrence of tetracycline-resistant and erythromycin-resistant bacteria (Salmonella, Escherichia, and Campylobacter) in retail meats was estimated.

Results: Analysis included data regarding tetracycline-resistant Salmonella (n = 8,501), Escherichia (n = 20, 283), Campylobacter (n = 9,682), and erythromycin-resistant Campylobacter (n = 10,446) in retail meats. The odds of detecting tetracycline-resistant Escherichia (OR = 0.60), Campylobacter (OR = 0.89), and erythromycin-resistant Campylobacter (OR = 0.43) in chicken breast significantly decreased after the VFD rule changes, compared to the pre-VFD rule change period. The odds of detecting tetracycline-resistant Salmonella (0.66), Escherichia (OR = 0.56), and Campylobacter (OR = 0.33) in ground turkey also significantly decreased. However, the odds of detecting tetracycline-resistant Salmonella (OR = 1.49) in chicken breast and erythromycin-resistant Campylobacter (OR = 4.63) in ground turkey significantly increased. There was no significant change in the odds of detecting tetracycline-resistant Salmonella and Escherichia in ground beef or pork chops.

Conclusions: The implementation of VFD rule changes had a beneficial effect by reducing the occurrence of tetracycline-resistant and erythromycin-resistant bacteria in chicken and ground turkey. Ongoing surveillance of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use could complement the implementation of stewardship such as VFD rule in food-producing animals in the U.S.

Citing Articles

spp. in Domestic Ruminants, Evaluation of Antimicrobial Resistance Based on the One Health Approach-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Garcia-Diez J, Moura D, Grispoldi L, Cenci-Goga B, Saraiva S, Silva F Vet Sci. 2024; 11(7).

PMID: 39057999 PMC: 11281391. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11070315.


Contaminants of Emerging Concern: Antibiotics Research in Mussels from the Coasts of the Tyrrhenian Sea (Sardinia, Italy).

Dessi F, Varoni M, Baralla E, Nieddu M, Pasciu V, Piras G Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 38672353 PMC: 11047641. DOI: 10.3390/ani14081205.


Monitoring antimicrobial resistance in isolates of chickens and turkeys at the slaughter establishment level across the United States, 2013-2021.

Sodagari H, Agrawal I, Sohail M, Yudhanto S, Varga C Epidemiol Infect. 2024; 152:e41.

PMID: 38403893 PMC: 10945939. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268824000359.

References
1.
Lipsitch M . The rise and fall of antimicrobial resistance. Trends Microbiol. 2001; 9(9):438-44. DOI: 10.1016/s0966-842x(01)02130-8. View

2.
Han F, Lestari S, Pu S, Ge B . Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. in Louisiana retail chickens after the enrofloxacin ban. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2008; 6(2):163-71. DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2008.0171. View

3.
Yang J, Zaitlen N, Goddard M, Visscher P, Price A . Advantages and pitfalls in the application of mixed-model association methods. Nat Genet. 2014; 46(2):100-6. PMC: 3989144. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2876. View

4.
White D, Zhao S, Sudler R, Ayers S, Friedman S, Chen S . The isolation of antibiotic-resistant salmonella from retail ground meats. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345(16):1147-54. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa010315. View

5.
Vikram A, Miller E, Arthur T, Bosilevac J, Wheeler T, Schmidt J . Similar Levels of Antimicrobial Resistance in U.S. Food Service Ground Beef Products with and without a "Raised without Antibiotics" Claim. J Food Prot. 2018; 81(12):2007-2018. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-299. View