» Articles » PMID: 24473328

Advantages and Pitfalls in the Application of Mixed-model Association Methods

Overview
Journal Nat Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2014 Jan 30
PMID 24473328
Citations 475
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mixed linear models are emerging as a method of choice for conducting genetic association studies in humans and other organisms. The advantages of the mixed-linear-model association (MLMA) method include the prevention of false positive associations due to population or relatedness structure and an increase in power obtained through the application of a correction that is specific to this structure. An underappreciated point is that MLMA can also increase power in studies without sample structure by implicitly conditioning on associated loci other than the candidate locus. Numerous variations on the standard MLMA approach have recently been published, with a focus on reducing computational cost. These advances provide researchers applying MLMA methods with many options to choose from, but we caution that MLMA methods are still subject to potential pitfalls. Here we describe and quantify the advantages and pitfalls of MLMA methods as a function of study design and provide recommendations for the application of these methods in practical settings.

Citing Articles

Variation for QTL alleles associated with total dissolved solids among crop types in a GWAS of a Beta vulgaris diversity panel.

Pelikan A, Goldman I Plant Genome. 2025; 18(1):e70014.

PMID: 40071467 PMC: 11897936. DOI: 10.1002/tpg2.70014.


Family-based genome-wide association study designs for increased power and robustness.

Guan J, Tan T, Nehzati S, Bennett M, Turley P, Benjamin D Nat Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 40065166 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-025-02118-0.


NeuroDISK: An AI Approach to Automate Continuous Inquiry-Driven Discoveries in Neuroimaging Genetics.

Garijo D, Yang Q, Vargas H, Gadewar S, Low K, Ratnakar V bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40027637 PMC: 11870421. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.14.638360.


Genetic and metabolic characterization of individual differences in liver fat accumulation in Atlantic salmon.

Horn S, Sonesson A, Krasnov A, Aslam M, Hillestad B, Ruyter B Front Genet. 2025; 16:1512769.

PMID: 40018642 PMC: 11865213. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1512769.


Mendelian randomisation to uncover causal associations between conformation, metabolism, and production as potential exposure to reproduction in German Holstein dairy cattle.

Schwarz L, Heise J, Liu Z, Bennewitz J, Thaller G, Tetens J Genet Sel Evol. 2025; 57(1):7.

PMID: 40000939 PMC: 11863791. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-025-00950-w.


References
1.
Listgarten J, Lippert C, Heckerman D . FaST-LMM-Select for addressing confounding from spatial structure and rare variants. Nat Genet. 2013; 45(5):470-1. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2620. View

2.
Zaitlen N, Lindstrom S, Pasaniuc B, Cornelis M, Genovese G, Pollack S . Informed conditioning on clinical covariates increases power in case-control association studies. PLoS Genet. 2012; 8(11):e1003032. PMC: 3493452. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003032. View

3.
Price A, Zaitlen N, Reich D, Patterson N . Response to Sul and Eskin. Nat Rev Genet. 2013; 14(4):300. PMC: 5586503. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2813-c2. View

4.
Sawcer S, Hellenthal G, Pirinen M, Spencer C, Patsopoulos N, Moutsianas L . Genetic risk and a primary role for cell-mediated immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis. Nature. 2011; 476(7359):214-9. PMC: 3182531. DOI: 10.1038/nature10251. View

5.
Svishcheva G, Axenovich T, Belonogova N, Van Duijn C, Aulchenko Y . Rapid variance components-based method for whole-genome association analysis. Nat Genet. 2012; 44(10):1166-70. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2410. View