» Articles » PMID: 37534372

OSNA Total Tumor Load for the Prediction of Axillary Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients: Should We Use Different Thresholds According to the Intrinsic Molecular Subtype? MOTTO Study

Overview
Journal Clin Pathol
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2023 Aug 3
PMID 37534372
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: To assess the impact of the molecular subtype (MS) on the total number of CK19 mRNA copies in all positive SLN (TTL) threshold, to predict non-SLN affectation, and to compare 5 years progression-free survival (PFS) according to the risk of recurrence (ROR) group by PAM50.

Methods: Cohort with infiltrating breast cancer with intra-operative metastatic SLN detected by one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay who underwent subsequent ALND. Logistic regression was used to assess a possible interaction between TTL and MS(Triple Negative, Her-2-Enriched, Luminal A, or Luminal B), or hormone receptors (HR: positive or negative) by immunohistochemistry (IMH). Cox regression was used to compare PFS and OS in the 3 ROR groups (high, medium, or low).

Results: TTL was predictive of non-SLN affectation in both univariate (OR [95% CI]: 1.72 [1.43, 2.05],  < .001) and multivariate (1.55 [95% CI: 1.04, 2.32],  = .030) models, but MS-IMH or HR-IMH, and their interactions with TTL were not (best multivariate model: HR + main effect OR 1.16 [95% CI: 0.18, 7.64],  = .874; interaction OR: 1.04 [0.7, 1.55],  = .835; univariate model: HR + main effect OR: 1.44 [95% CI: 0.85, 2.44],  = .180). PFS was lower in the high-risk ROR group (81.1%) than in the low-risk group (93.9%) (HR: 3.68 [95 CI: 1.70, 7.94],  < .001).

Conclusions: our results do not provide evidence to support the utilization of subtype-specific thresholds for TTL values to make therapeutic decisions on the axilla. The ROR group was predictive of 5 years-PFS.

References
1.
Peg V, Sansano I, Vieites B, Bernet L, Cano R, Cordoba A . Role of total tumour load of sentinel lymph node on survival in early breast cancer patients. Breast. 2017; 33:8-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.02.011. View

2.
Schem C, Maass N, Bauerschlag D, Carstensen M, Loning T, Roder C . One-step nucleic acid amplification-a molecular method for the detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients; results of the German study group. Virchows Arch. 2008; 454(2):203-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00428-008-0703-9. View

3.
Parker J, Mullins M, Cheang M, Leung S, Voduc D, Vickery T . Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(8):1160-7. PMC: 2667820. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.1370. View

4.
Kennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R, Chon U Cheang M, Voduc D, Speers C . Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(20):3271-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9820. View

5.
Osako T, Tsuda H, Horii R, Iwase T, Yamauchi H, Yagata H . Molecular detection of lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients treated with preoperative systemic chemotherapy: a prospective multicentre trial using the one-step nucleic acid amplification assay. Br J Cancer. 2013; 109(6):1693-8. PMC: 3777008. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.503. View