» Articles » PMID: 37532612

A Review of Criteria Strictness in "Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials"

Overview
Journal Vaccine
Date 2023 Aug 2
PMID 37532612
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To assess safety in vaccine development, stricter grading scales, such as the "Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials" issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA grading scale), are required. However, concern exists that their strictness may lead to an overestimation of some adverse events (AEs). We analyzed the details of AEs in a phase I clinical trial of a preventive vaccine for infectious diseases. In this trial, we observed the high occurrence of Grade 1 or greater AEs in hemoglobin changes from baseline value, and hypernatremia, and hypokalemia by FDA grading scale. The range considered as non-AE according to the FDA grading scale shifted or became narrower when compared to reference intervals, especially for a Japanese cohort. For sodium grading, the criterion for hypernatremia was around 2 to mEq/L lower than the upper limit of most standards in several countries. Also, the criterion for hypokalemia was around 0.2 mEq/L higher than the lower limit of most standards. Regarding a decrease in hemoglobin from baseline, the criterion of "any decrease" used for a Grade 1 AE was too strict and we suggest this be omitted. Upper and lower limits of AE criteria for sodium and potassium should be equal to, or 10-20% above, the reference interval consistent with other toxicities determined by laboratory tests. Consideration should be given to the issues surrounding the criteria that determine AEs before conducting clinical trials.

Citing Articles

A Pilot Open-Label Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Acceptability of the IntegriMedical® Needle Free Injection System versus a Conventional Needle-Based System in Healthy Volunteers, Using Normal Saline as a Placebo.

Pathan A, Shetty Narasimha K, Naik A, Ranade A Med Devices (Auckl). 2025; 17:525-536.

PMID: 39742081 PMC: 11687312. DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S491883.


Innate immune response after BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination associates with reactogenicity.

van Ewijk C, Suarez Hernandez S, Jacobi R, Knol M, Hahne S, Wijmenga-Monsuur A Vaccine X. 2024; 22:100593.

PMID: 39734394 PMC: 11681879. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100593.


Safety and immunogenicity of CD40.HIVRI.Env, a dendritic cell-based HIV vaccine, in healthy HIV-uninfected adults: a first-in-human randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study (ANRS VRI06).

Levy Y, Moog C, Wiedemann A, Launay O, Candotti F, Hardel L EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 77:102845.

PMID: 39649135 PMC: 11625018. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102845.


Immunogenicity and safety of tixagevimab-cilgavimab for COVID-19 pre-exposure prophylaxis in immunocompromised 20 to <40 kg children and adolescents: A pilot, prospective, open-labeled study.

Buaboonnam J, Rungmaitree S, Piyaphanee N, Charuvanij S, Pitisuttithum O, Copeland K Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024; 20(1):2428011.

PMID: 39575846 PMC: 11587845. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2428011.


Evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibitors for colorectal cancer: A network meta‑analysis.

Tzang C, Lee Y, Lin W, Lin L, Kang Y, Lin T Oncol Lett. 2024; 28(6):569.

PMID: 39390977 PMC: 11465421. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14702.