» Articles » PMID: 39390977

Evaluation of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Colorectal Cancer: A Network Meta‑analysis

Overview
Journal Oncol Lett
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Oct 11
PMID 39390977
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is challenging to treat due to its high metastatic rate. Recent strategies have focused on combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with other treatments. The aim of the present study was to conduct a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy and adverse effects of different ICI treatments for CRC. A literature search for RCTs was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov and Web of Science databases, covering the period from the inception of each database until April 2024. A total of 12 RCTs involving 2,050 participants were selected for inclusion in the analysis. The network meta-analysis employed the MetaInsight tool to assess multiple endpoints. The criteria for study selection were based on the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome and Studies framework as follows: i) Population, patients with CRC; ii) intervention, studies using ICI to treat CRC; iii) comparison, active comparators, including placebo; iv) outcome, overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate and adverse events; and v) study design, RCTs. The results of the analysis revealed that programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors significantly improved overall survival time [mean difference (MD), 2.28 months; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.44 to 4.11], while programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors exhibited a superior progression-free survival time (MD, 4.79 months; 95% CI, 3.18 to 6.40) compared with active comparators. However, none of the ICI treatments had significant differences in odds ratios for the objective response rate and adverse events compared with active comparators. These findings indicate that treatment with PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors improved the overall survival time and delayed disease progression in patients with CRC. These findings offer valuable insights for future research aimed at improving CRC patient outcomes.

References
1.
Antoniotti C, Rossini D, Pietrantonio F, Catteau A, Salvatore L, Lonardi S . Upfront FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab with or without atezolizumab in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (AtezoTRIBE): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022; 23(7):876-887. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00274-1. View

2.
Tabernero J, Grothey A, Arnold D, de Gramont A, Ducreux M, ODwyer P . MODUL cohort 2: an adaptable, randomized, signal-seeking trial of fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab with or without atezolizumab maintenance therapy for BRAF metastatic colorectal cancer. ESMO Open. 2022; 7(5):100559. PMC: 9588902. DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100559. View

3.
Andre T, Shiu K, Kim T, Jensen B, Jensen L, Punt C . Pembrolizumab in Microsatellite-Instability-High Advanced Colorectal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(23):2207-2218. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2017699. View

4.
Buchbinder E, Desai A . CTLA-4 and PD-1 Pathways: Similarities, Differences, and Implications of Their Inhibition. Am J Clin Oncol. 2015; 39(1):98-106. PMC: 4892769. DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000239. View

5.
Zeng T, Fang X, Lu J, Zhong Y, Lin X, Lin Z . Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021; 37(1):251-258. PMC: 8760220. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-04028-z. View