The Temporal Burden of Preparing Catheters for Re-use in Adults with Spinal Cord Injury: a Cross-sectional Study

Overview

Journal Spinal Cord Ser Cases

Specialty Neurology

Date 2023 Aug 1

PMID 37528074

Authors

T Miller

L J Roik

T Kalimullina

S Samejima

C Shackleton

R N Malik

R Sachdeva

A V Krassioukov

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Study Design: Cross-sectional OBJECTIVES: Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction is common among people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Although single-use clean intermittent catheterization is recommended to facilitate routine bladder emptying, catheter re-use is common. Barriers associated with the preparation (i.e., cleaning) of catheters for re-use are unknown. This study examined barriers to catheter re-use in adult individuals with SCI by assessing (1) the time needed to clean a catheter, and (2) the perceived difficulty of the catheter cleaning routine.

Setting: Laboratory METHODS: Twenty individuals with chronic SCI ( ≥ 1 year since injury; Group 1 = 10 with tetraplegia; Group 2 = 10 with paraplegia) completed the study. Using a standardized cleaning procedure (i.e., Milton method), catheter cleaning was timed for each participant. Perceived difficulty was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Functional impairment was assessed with the Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS).

Results: Significant between-group differences were observed for total cleaning time (Group 1 = 1584.1 ± 179.8 s; Group 2 = 1321.0 ± 93.8 s, p = 0.004) and perceived difficulty [Group 1 = 2.6 (2, 3); Group 2 = 2 (1.7, 2.3), p = 0.028]. Total cleaning time was significantly correlated with UEMS (ρ = -0.709, p ≤ 0.001) and perceived difficulty (ρ = 0.468, p = 0.037). UEMS emerged as an independent predictor of total cleaning time (R = 0.745, β = -0.833, p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusions: Preparing catheters for re-use is time-intensive and difficult for people with higher SCI level, severity and more pronounced upper limb motor impairment, which was independently associated with total cleaning time. Performing this routine on a consistent basis would require a substantial time commitment and would have a profoundly negative impact on overall quality of life.

References

Anderson K . Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2005; 21(10):1371-83. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371. View

Wilks S, Morris N, Thompson R, Prieto J, MacAulay M, Moore K . An effective evidence-based cleaning method for the safe reuse of intermittent urinary catheters: In vitro testing. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020; 39(3):907-915. DOI: 10.1002/nau.24296. View

Christison K, Walter M, Wyndaele J, Kennelly M, Kessler T, Noonan V . Intermittent Catheterization: The Devil Is in the Details. J Neurotrauma. 2017; 35(7):985-989. PMC: 5865623. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2017.5413. View

Krassioukov A, Biering-Sorensen F, Donovan W, Kennelly M, Kirshblum S, Krogh K . International standards to document remaining autonomic function after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012; 35(4):201-10. PMC: 3425875. DOI: 10.1179/1079026812Z.00000000053. View

Welk B, Isaranuwatchai W, Krassioukov A, Husted Torp L, Elterman D . Cost-effectiveness of hydrophilic-coated intermittent catheters compared with uncoated catheters in Canada: a public payer perspective. J Med Econ. 2018; 21(7):639-648. DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1443112. View

Samejima S, Shackleton C, Miller T, Moritz C, Kessler T, Krogh K . Mapping the Iceberg of Autonomic Recovery: Mechanistic Underpinnings of Neuromodulation following Spinal Cord Injury. Neuroscientist. 2023; 30(3):378-389. PMC: 11107126. DOI: 10.1177/10738584221145570. View

Sun A, Comiter C, Elliott C . The cost of a catheter: An environmental perspective on single use clean intermittent catheterization. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018; 37(7):2204-2208. DOI: 10.1002/nau.23562. View

Kennelly M, Thiruchelvam N, Averbeck M, Konstatinidis C, Chartier-Kastler E, Trojgaard P . Adult Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction and Intermittent Catheterisation in a Community Setting: Risk Factors Model for Urinary Tract Infections. Adv Urol. 2019; 2019:2757862. PMC: 6466920. DOI: 10.1155/2019/2757862. View

Hakansson M . Reuse versus single-use catheters for intermittent catheterization: what is safe and preferred? Review of current status. Spinal Cord. 2014; 52(7):511-6. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2014.79. View

10.

Ho C, Krassioukov A . Autonomic dysreflexia and myocardial ischemia. Spinal Cord. 2010; 48(9):714-5. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2010.2. View

11.

Zimmermann G, Bolter L, Sluka R, Holler Y, Bathke A, Thomschewski A . Sample sizes and statistical methods in interventional studies on individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. J Evid Based Med. 2019; 12(3):200-208. PMC: 6771853. DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12356. View

12.

Lim S, Lee H, Davis M, Park K . Perceived barriers and difficulties of intermittent catheterization: In Korean patients with spinal dysraphism and their parents. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014; 35(3):395-9. DOI: 10.1002/nau.22716. View

13.

Groen J, Pannek J, Diaz D, Del Popolo G, Gross T, Hamid R . Summary of European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines on Neuro-Urology. Eur Urol. 2015; 69(2):324-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.071. View

14.

Krassioukov A, Claydon V . The clinical problems in cardiovascular control following spinal cord injury: an overview. Prog Brain Res. 2005; 152:223-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)52014-4. View

15.

Kovacs C . A personal perspective on catastrophic case management. Prof Case Manag. 2010; 15(6):341-2. DOI: 10.1097/NCM.0b013e3182005e98. View

16.

Goldstine J, Leece R, Samas S, Zonderland R . In Their Own Words: Adults' Lived Experiences With Intermittent Catheterization. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2019; 46(6):513-518. DOI: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000591. View

17.

Miller T, Lange D, Kizhakkedathu J, Yu K, Felix D, Samejima S . The Microbiological Burden of Short-Term Catheter Reuse in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective Study. Biomedicines. 2023; 11(7). PMC: 10377649. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11071929. View

18.

Waller L, Jonsson O, Norlen L, Sullivan L . Clean intermittent catheterization in spinal cord injury patients: long-term followup of a hydrophilic low friction technique. J Urol. 1995; 153(2):345-8. DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199502000-00014. View

19.

Woodbury M, Hayes K, Askes H . Intermittent catheterization practices following spinal cord injury: a national survey. Can J Urol. 2008; 15(3):4065-71. View

20.

Gould C, Umscheid C, Agarwal R, Kuntz G, Pegues D . Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections 2009. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010; 31(4):319-26. DOI: 10.1086/651091. View