Shifting the Level of Selection in Science

Overview

Journal Perspect Psychol Sci

Specialty Psychology

Date 2023 Aug 1

PMID 37526118

Authors

Leo Tiokhin

Karthik Panchanathan

Paul E Smaldino

Daniel Lakens

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Criteria for recognizing and rewarding scientists primarily focus on individual contributions. This creates a conflict between what is best for scientists' careers and what is best for science. In this article, we show how the theory of multilevel selection provides conceptual tools for modifying incentives to better align individual and collective interests. A core principle is the need to account for indirect effects by shifting the level at which selection operates from individuals to the groups in which individuals are embedded. This principle is used in several fields to improve collective outcomes, including animal husbandry, team sports, and professional organizations. Shifting the level of selection has the potential to ameliorate several problems in contemporary science, including accounting for scientists' diverse contributions to knowledge generation, reducing individual-level competition, and promoting specialization and team science. We discuss the difficulties associated with shifting the level of selection and outline directions for future development in this domain.

Citing Articles

The costs of competition in distributing scarce research funds.

Schweiger G, Barnett A, van den Besselaar P, Bornmann L, De Block A, Ioannidis J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(50):e2407644121.

PMID: 39621909 PMC: 11648638. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2407644121.

Assessing computational reproducibility in Behavior Research Methods.

Ellis D, Towse J, Brown O, Cork A, Davidson B, Devereux S Behav Res Methods. 2024; 56(8):8745-8760.

PMID: 39322919 PMC: 11525395. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02501-5.

"Best Paper" awards lack transparency, inclusivity, and support for Open Science.

Lagisz M, Rutkowska J, Aich U, Ross R, Santana M, Wang J PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(7):e3002715.

PMID: 39042591 PMC: 11265724. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002715.

Beyond kindness: a proposal for the flourishing of science and scientists alike.

Schumann F, Smolka M, Dienes Z, Lubbert A, Lukas W, Rees M R Soc Open Sci. 2023; 10(11):230728.

PMID: 38026042 PMC: 10663797. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.230728.

Open Science 2.0: Towards a truly collaborative research ecosystem.

Thibault R, Amaral O, Argolo F, Bandrowski A, Davidson A, Drude N PLoS Biol. 2023; 21(10):e3002362.

PMID: 37856538 PMC: 10617723. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002362.

References

Smaldino P . Better methods can't make up for mediocre theory. Nature. 2019; 575(7781):9. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-03350-5. View

Gross K, Bergstrom C . Contest models highlight inherent inefficiencies of scientific funding competitions. PLoS Biol. 2019; 17(1):e3000065. PMC: 6314589. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000065. View

Engel C . Scientific disintegrity as a public bad. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 10(3):361-79. DOI: 10.1177/1745691615577865. View

Zefferman M, Mathew S . An evolutionary theory of large-scale human warfare: Group-structured cultural selection. Evol Anthropol. 2015; 24(2):50-61. DOI: 10.1002/evan.21439. View

Barnett A, Zardo P, Graves N . Randomly auditing research labs could be an affordable way to improve research quality: A simulation study. PLoS One. 2018; 13(4):e0195613. PMC: 5896971. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195613. View

Muir W . Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: selection program and direct responses. Poult Sci. 1996; 75(4):447-58. DOI: 10.3382/ps.0750447. View

Moher D, Naudet F, Cristea I, Miedema F, Ioannidis J, Goodman S . Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLoS Biol. 2018; 16(3):e2004089. PMC: 5892914. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089. View

Boyd R, Richerson P . Group beneficial norms can spread rapidly in a structured population. J Theor Biol. 2002; 215(3):287-96. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2515. View

Ioannidis J . How to make more published research true. PLoS Med. 2014; 11(10):e1001747. PMC: 4204808. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747. View

10.

West S, Fisher R, Gardner A, Kiers E . Major evolutionary transitions in individuality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(33):10112-9. PMC: 4547252. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1421402112. View

11.

Fletcher J, Doebeli M . A simple and general explanation for the evolution of altruism. Proc Biol Sci. 2008; 276(1654):13-9. PMC: 2614248. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0829. View

12.

Smaldino P, Turner M, Contreras Kallens P . Open science and modified funding lotteries can impede the natural selection of bad science. R Soc Open Sci. 2019; 6(7):190194. PMC: 6689639. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.190194. View

13.

Moher D, Bouter L, Kleinert S, Glasziou P, Sham M, Barbour V . The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biol. 2020; 18(7):e3000737. PMC: 7365391. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737. View

14.

Woolley A, Chabris C, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone T . Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science. 2010; 330(6004):686-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1193147. View

15.

Smaldino P, McElreath R . The natural selection of bad science. R Soc Open Sci. 2016; 3(9):160384. PMC: 5043322. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160384. View

16.

Gardner A . The genetical theory of multilevel selection. J Evol Biol. 2014; 28(2):305-19. PMC: 4415573. DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12566. View

17.

Wilson D . A theory of group selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975; 72(1):143-6. PMC: 432258. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.72.1.143. View

18.

McNutt M, Bradford M, Drazen J, Hanson B, Howard B, Hall Jamieson K . Transparency in authors' contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(11):2557-2560. PMC: 5856527. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1715374115. View

19.

Dawson D, Morales E, McKiernan E, Schimanski L, Niles M, Alperin J . The role of collegiality in academic review, promotion, and tenure. PLoS One. 2022; 17(4):e0265506. PMC: 8986017. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265506. View

20.

West S, Griffin A, Gardner A . Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. J Evol Biol. 2007; 20(2):415-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01258.x. View