» Articles » PMID: 37521145

New Method for Rapid 3D Reconstruction of Semi-Transparent Underwater Animals and Structures

Overview
Journal Integr Org Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Jul 31
PMID 37521145
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Morphological features are the primary identifying properties of most animals and key to many comparative physiological studies, yet current techniques for preservation and documentation of soft-bodied marine animals are limited in terms of quality and accessibility. Digital records can complement physical specimens, with a wide array of applications ranging from species description to kinematics modeling, but options are lacking for creating models of soft-bodied semi-transparent underwater animals. We developed a lab-based technique that can live-scan semi-transparent, submerged animals, and objects within seconds. To demonstrate the method, we generated full three-dimensional reconstructions (3DRs) of an object of known dimensions for verification, as well as two live marine animals-a siphonophore and an amphipod-allowing detailed measurements on each. Techniques like these pave the way for faster data capture, integrative and comparative quantitative approaches, and more accessible collections of fragile and rare biological samples.

Citing Articles

Spinning and corkscrewing of oceanic macroplankton revealed through in situ imaging.

Sutherland K, Damian-Serrano A, Du Clos K, Gemmell B, Colin S, Costello J Sci Adv. 2024; 10(20):eadm9511.

PMID: 38748799 PMC: 11095445. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adm9511.


An in situ digital synthesis strategy for the discovery and description of ocean life.

Burns J, Becker K, Casagrande D, Daniels J, Roberts P, Orenstein E Sci Adv. 2024; 10(3):eadj4960.

PMID: 38232174 PMC: 10793947. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adj4960.

References
1.
Do S, Karl W, Liang Z, Kalra M, Brady T, Pien H . A decomposition-based CT reconstruction formulation for reducing blooming artifacts. Phys Med Biol. 2011; 56(22):7109-25. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/22/008. View

2.
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin J, Pujol S . 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 30(9):1323-41. PMC: 3466397. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001. View

3.
Diaz-Pinto A, Alle S, Nath V, Tang Y, Ihsani A, Asad M . MONAI Label: A framework for AI-assisted interactive labeling of 3D medical images. Med Image Anal. 2024; 95:103207. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2024.103207. View

4.
Irschick D, Christiansen F, Hammerschlag N, Martin J, Madsen P, Wyneken J . 3D visualization processes for recreating and studying organismal form. iScience. 2022; 25(9):104867. PMC: 9437858. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104867. View

5.
Cox P, Fagan M, Rayfield E, Jeffery N . Finite element modelling of squirrel, guinea pig and rat skulls: using geometric morphometrics to assess sensitivity. J Anat. 2011; 219(6):696-709. PMC: 3237878. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01436.x. View