» Articles » PMID: 21974720

Finite Element Modelling of Squirrel, Guinea Pig and Rat Skulls: Using Geometric Morphometrics to Assess Sensitivity

Overview
Journal J Anat
Date 2011 Oct 7
PMID 21974720
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rodents are defined by a uniquely specialized dentition and a highly complex arrangement of jaw-closing muscles. Finite element analysis (FEA) is an ideal technique to investigate the biomechanical implications of these specializations, but it is essential to understand fully the degree of influence of the different input parameters of the FE model to have confidence in the model's predictions. This study evaluates the sensitivity of FE models of rodent crania to elastic properties of the materials, loading direction, and the location and orientation of the models' constraints. Three FE models were constructed of squirrel, guinea pig and rat skulls. Each was loaded to simulate biting on the incisors, and the first and the third molars, with the angle of the incisal bite varied over a range of 45°. The Young's moduli of the bone and teeth components were varied between limits defined by findings from our own and previously published tests of material properties. Geometric morphometrics (GMM) was used to analyse the resulting skull deformations. Bone stiffness was found to have the strongest influence on the results in all three rodents, followed by bite position, and then bite angle and muscle orientation. Tooth material properties were shown to have little effect on the deformation of the skull. The effect of bite position varied between species, with the mesiodistal position of the biting tooth being most important in squirrels and guinea pigs, whereas bilateral vs. unilateral biting had the greatest influence in rats. A GMM analysis of isolated incisor deformations showed that, for all rodents, bite angle is the most important parameter, followed by elastic properties of the tooth. The results here elucidate which input parameters are most important when defining the FE models, but also provide interesting glimpses of the biomechanical differences between the three skulls, which will be fully explored in future publications.

Citing Articles

Generating novel tennis racket shape concepts using a theoretical morphospace.

Grant R, Bonhomme V, Allen T PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0310155.

PMID: 39264952 PMC: 11392236. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310155.


Understanding the influence of surgical parameters on craniofacial surgery outcomes: a computational study.

He K, Bruse J, Rodriguez-Florez N, Dunaway D, Jeelani O, Schievano S R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(4):231158.

PMID: 38577216 PMC: 10987985. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.231158.


New Method for Rapid 3D Reconstruction of Semi-Transparent Underwater Animals and Structures.

Daniels J, Sainz G, Katija K Integr Org Biol. 2023; 5(1):obad023.

PMID: 37521145 PMC: 10372866. DOI: 10.1093/iob/obad023.


Masticatory biomechanics of red and grey squirrels ( and ) modelled with multibody dynamics analysis.

Cox P, Watson P R Soc Open Sci. 2023; 10(2):220587.

PMID: 36816846 PMC: 9929510. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.220587.


Assessment of the mechanical role of cranial sutures in the mammalian skull: Computational biomechanical modelling of the rat skull.

Sharp A, Dutel H, Watson P, Groning F, Crumpton N, Fagan M J Morphol. 2023; 284(3):e21555.

PMID: 36630615 PMC: 10107956. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.21555.


References
1.
Ross C, Patel B, Slice D, Strait D, Dechow P, Richmond B . Modeling masticatory muscle force in finite element analysis: sensitivity analysis using principal coordinates analysis. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2005; 283(2):288-99. DOI: 10.1002/ar.a.20170. View

2.
van Spronsen P, Weijs W, Valk J, Prahl-Andersen B, van Ginkel F . Comparison of jaw-muscle bite-force cross-sections obtained by means of magnetic resonance imaging and high-resolution CT scanning. J Dent Res. 1989; 68(12):1765-70. DOI: 10.1177/00220345890680120901. View

3.
Moreno K, Wroe S, Clausen P, McHenry C, DAmore D, Rayfield E . Cranial performance in the Komodo dragon (Varanus komodoensis) as revealed by high-resolution 3-D finite element analysis. J Anat. 2008; 212(6):736-46. PMC: 2423397. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00899.x. View

4.
Fagan M, Julian S, Siddall D, Mohsen A . Patient-specific spine models. Part 1: Finite element analysis of the lumbar intervertebral disc--a material sensitivity study. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2002; 216(5):299-314. DOI: 10.1243/09544110260216577. View

5.
Reilly S, McBrayer L, White T . Prey processing in amniotes: biomechanical and behavioral patterns of food reduction. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2001; 128(3):397-415. DOI: 10.1016/s1095-6433(00)00326-3. View