» Articles » PMID: 37505870

Investigation of Trehalose Supplementation Impacting and from Broiler Farming

Overview
Journal Vet Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Jul 28
PMID 37505870
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In 2006, the European Commission banned the use of antibiotic promoters in animal feed. However, there is a new situation in poultry disease where it is necessary to study feed additives, which can overcome the diseases that were previously controlled through the addition of antibiotics and antimicrobial growth promoters in the feed. Therefore, trehalose was investigated to determine whether it impacts the growth performance and pathogenic bacteria ( and ) inoculation in broilers. In the first experiment, the tolerance of broilers to the addition of trehalose to their feed was investigated. There was no significant difference ( > 0.05) in body weight changes, daily weight gain, feed intake or feed conversion ratio during the feeding period. Within a 35-day feeding period, it was concluded that a trehalose dosage up to 10% does not exert a negative effect on broiler farming. Moreover, there was no significant difference ( > 0.05) in the broilers' growth performance, as well as and counts in the intestines and feces of broilers observed over a 5-week feeding period. However, counts significantly increased in these groups with 3% and 5% trehalose supplementation. The findings indicate that trehalose supplementation in the feed cannot directly decrease and counts but may enhance gut health by raising counts in chicken gut, particularly when enteropathogenic bacteria are present.

References
1.
Hermans D, Van Deun K, Messens W, Martel A, Van Immerseel F, Haesebrouck F . Campylobacter control in poultry by current intervention measures ineffective: urgent need for intensified fundamental research. Vet Microbiol. 2011; 152(3-4):219-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.03.010. View

2.
Al-Surrayai T, Al-Khalaifah H . Dietary Supplementation of Fructooligosaccharides Enhanced Antioxidant Activity and Cellular Immune Response in Broiler Chickens. Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:857294. PMC: 9048480. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.857294. View

3.
Calik A, Omara I, White M, Evans N, Karnezos T, Dalloul R . Dietary Non-Drug Feed Additive as an Alternative for Antibiotic Growth Promoters for Broilers During a Necrotic Enteritis Challenge. Microorganisms. 2019; 7(8). PMC: 6723652. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7080257. View

4.
Mohiuddin M, Song Z, Liao S, Qi N, Li J, Lv M . Animal Model Studies, Antibiotic Resistance and Toxin Gene Profile of NE Reproducing Type A and Type G Strains Isolated from Commercial Poultry Farms in China. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(3). PMC: 10059142. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11030622. View

5.
Olkowski A, Wojnarowicz C, Chirino-Trejo M, Drew M . Responses of broiler chickens orally challenged with Clostridium perfringens isolated from field cases of necrotic enteritis. Res Vet Sci. 2005; 81(1):99-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2005.10.006. View