» Articles » PMID: 37502102

Accuracy of Leg Length and Hip Offset Measurements Using a Fluoroscopic Grid During Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2023 Jul 28
PMID 37502102
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Minimizing leg length (LLD) and hip offset (OD) discrepancies is critical for tissue tension and implant longevity in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The direct anterior approach (DAA) helps surgeons recreate these values under fluoroscopy. Several methods to accomplish this have been described, with no consensus on which is superior. This study evaluated the ability to minimize LLD and OD using a surgeon-controlled, adjustable fluoroscopic grid. We hypothesized that this tool would recreate parameters to within 10 mm of the contralateral side.

Methods: One hundred eleven primary THAs performed with an adjustable radiopaque grid to equalize leg length and hip offset were retrospectively reviewed. These values were measured on postoperative radiographs and compared to the contralateral hip. Patients were excluded if they had inadequate imaging, revision arthroplasty, preexisting deformities, or underwent approaches other than DAA.

Results: Mean age was 59.1 ± 11.1 years, 63.1% of patients were female, and average body mass index was 27.8 ± 7.0. Mean LLD was 3.7 ± 3.0 mm, while mean OD was 4.6 ± 3.6 mm. 95.5% of hips showed LLD < 10 mm, while 93.7% of hips had OD < 10 mm. Furthermore, 76.6% of hips had LLD < 5 mm, while 62.2% of hips had OD < 5 mm.

Conclusions: The described technique restored limb length and hip offset during DAA THA. This technique yields consistent results and offers an inexpensive alternative to costly digital software and more cumbersome fixed grid systems.

Citing Articles

"Intra-operative assessment of leg length discrepancy with anterior approach total hip replacement: a comparison between standard table, position table with and without intra-operative radiographs".

Viglietta E, Fenucci S, Iorio R, Parisien A, Grammatopoulos G, Kim P Int Orthop. 2025; .

PMID: 39951054 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-025-06411-9.

References
1.
Clark C, Huddleston H, Schoch 3rd E, Thomas B . Leg-length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006; 14(1):38-45. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200601000-00007. View

2.
OBrien S, Kernohan G, Fitzpatrick C, Hill J, Beverland D . Perception of imposed leg length inequality in normal subjects. Hip Int. 2010; 20(4):505-11. DOI: 10.1177/112070001002000414. View

3.
Finch D, Martin B, Franklin P, Magder L, Pellegrini Jr V . Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Comparison Based on Surgical Approaches. J Arthroplasty. 2020; 35(4):1029-1035.e3. PMC: 8218222. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.017. View

4.
Gililland J, Anderson L, Boffeli S, Pelt C, Peters C, Kubiak E . A fluoroscopic grid in supine total hip arthroplasty: improving cup position, limb length, and hip offset. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(8 Suppl):111-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.027. View

5.
Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth N . Projected Volume of Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018; 100(17):1455-1460. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01617. View