» Articles » PMID: 37492373

Heterogeneity in the Gene Regulatory Landscape of Leiomyosarcoma

Overview
Journal NAR Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Jul 26
PMID 37492373
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Characterizing inter-tumor heterogeneity is crucial for selecting suitable cancer therapy, as the presence of diverse molecular subgroups of patients can be associated with disease outcome or response to treatment. While cancer subtypes are often characterized by differences in gene expression, the mechanisms driving these differences are generally unknown. We set out to model the regulatory mechanisms driving sarcoma heterogeneity based on patient-specific, genome-wide gene regulatory networks. We developed a new computational framework, PORCUPINE, which combines knowledge on biological pathways with permutation-based network analysis to identify pathways that exhibit significant regulatory heterogeneity across a patient population. We applied PORCUPINE to patient-specific leiomyosarcoma networks modeled on data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and validated our results in an independent dataset from the German Cancer Research Center. PORCUPINE identified 37 heterogeneously regulated pathways, including pathways representing potential targets for treatment of subgroups of leiomyosarcoma patients, such as FGFR and CTLA4 inhibitory signaling. We validated the detected regulatory heterogeneity through analysis of networks and chromatin states in leiomyosarcoma cell lines. We showed that the heterogeneity identified with PORCUPINE is not associated with methylation profiles or clinical features, thereby suggesting an independent mechanism of patient heterogeneity driven by the complex landscape of gene regulatory interactions.

Citing Articles

Reproducible processing of TCGA regulatory networks.

Fanfani V, Shutta K, Mandros P, Fischer J, Saha E, Micheletti S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39574772 PMC: 11580957. DOI: 10.1101/2024.11.05.622163.


The Network Zoo: a multilingual package for the inference and analysis of gene regulatory networks.

Ben Guebila M, Wang T, Lopes-Ramos C, Fanfani V, Weighill D, Burkholz R Genome Biol. 2023; 24(1):45.

PMID: 36894939 PMC: 9999668. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-023-02877-1.

References
1.
Segal N, Pavlidis P, Antonescu C, Maki R, Noble W, Desantis D . Classification and subtype prediction of adult soft tissue sarcoma by functional genomics. Am J Pathol. 2003; 163(2):691-700. PMC: 1868218. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63696-6. View

2.
Kuijjer M, Tung M, Yuan G, Quackenbush J, Glass K . Estimating Sample-Specific Regulatory Networks. iScience. 2019; 14:226-240. PMC: 6463816. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2019.03.021. View

3.
Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Wyder S, Forslund K, Heller D, Huerta-Cepas J . STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 43(Database issue):D447-52. PMC: 4383874. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku1003. View

4.
Ben Guebila M, Lopes-Ramos C, Weighill D, Sonawane A, Burkholz R, Shamsaei B . GRAND: a database of gene regulatory network models across human conditions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 50(D1):D610-D621. PMC: 8728257. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab778. View

5.
Chibon F, Lagarde P, Salas S, Perot G, Brouste V, Tirode F . Validated prediction of clinical outcome in sarcomas and multiple types of cancer on the basis of a gene expression signature related to genome complexity. Nat Med. 2010; 16(7):781-7. DOI: 10.1038/nm.2174. View