» Articles » PMID: 37491022

Comparative Effectiveness of Bivalent BA.4-5 and BA.1 MRNA Booster Vaccines Among Adults Aged ≥50 Years in Nordic Countries: Nationwide Cohort Study

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Jul 25
PMID 37491022
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To estimate the effectiveness of the bivalent mRNA booster vaccines containing the original SARS-CoV-2 and omicron BA.4-5 or BA.1 subvariants as the fourth dose against severe covid-19.

Design: Nationwide cohort analyses, using target trial emulation.

Setting: Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, from 1 July 2022 to 10 April 2023.

Participants: People aged ≥50 years who had received at least three doses of covid-19 vaccine (that is, a primary course and a first booster).

Main Outcome Measures: The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to compare the risk of hospital admission and death related to covid-19 in people who received a bivalent Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) or Spikevax (Moderna) BA.4-5 or BA.1 mRNA booster vaccine as a fourth dose (second booster) with three dose (first booster) vaccinated people and between four dose vaccinated people.

Results: A total of 1 634 199 people receiving bivalent BA.4-5 fourth dose booster and 1 042 124 receiving bivalent BA.1 fourth dose booster across the four Nordic countries were included. Receipt of a bivalent BA.4-5 booster as a fourth dose was associated with a comparative vaccine effectiveness against admission to hospital with covid-19 of 67.8% (95% confidence interval 63.1% to 72.5%) and a risk difference of -91.9 (95% confidence interval -152.4 to -31.4) per 100 000 people at three months of follow-up compared with having received three doses of vaccine (289 893 events). The corresponding comparative vaccine effectiveness and risk difference for bivalent BA.1 boosters (332 977 events) were 65.8% (59.1% to 72.4%) and -112.9 (-179.6 to -46.2) per 100 000, respectively. Comparative vaccine effectiveness and risk difference against covid-19 related death were 69.8% (52.8% to 86.8%) and -34.1 (-40.1 to -28.2) per 100 000 for bivalent BA.4-5 booster (93 325 events) and 70.0% (50.3% to 89.7%) and -38.7 (-65.4 to -12.0) per 100 000 for BA.1 booster (86 286) as a fourth dose. Comparing bivalent BA.4-5 and BA.1 boosters as a fourth dose directly resulted in a three month comparative vaccine effectiveness and corresponding risk difference of -14.9% (-62.3% to 32.4%) and 10.0 (-14.4 to 34.4) per 100 000 people for admission to hospital with covid-19 (802 932 unweighted events) and -40.7% (-123.4% to 42.1%) and 8.1 (-3.3 to 19.4) per 100 000 for covid-19 related death (229 243 unweighted events). The comparative vaccine effectiveness did not differ across sex and age (</≥70 years) and seemed to be sustained up to six months from the day of vaccination with modest waning.

Conclusion: Vaccination with bivalent BA.4-5 or BA.1 mRNA booster vaccines as a fourth dose was associated with reduced rates of covid-19 related hospital admission and death among adults aged ≥50 years. The protection afforded by the bivalent BA.4-5 and BA.1 boosters did not differ significantly when directly compared, and any potential difference would most likely be very small in absolute numbers.

Citing Articles

Comparative effectiveness of monovalent XBB.1.5 containing covid-19 mRNA vaccines in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden: target trial emulation based on registry data.

Andersson N, Thiesson E, Pihlstrom N, Perala J, Faksova K, Gram M BMJ Med. 2025; 3(1):e001074.

PMID: 39902239 PMC: 11789462. DOI: 10.1136/bmjmed-2024-001074.


Methodological challenges using routine clinical care data for real-world evidence: a rapid review utilizing a systematic literature search and focus group discussion.

Pfaffenlehner M, Behrens M, Zoller D, Ungethum K, Gunther K, Rucker V BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025; 25(1):8.

PMID: 39810151 PMC: 11731536. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02440-x.


COVID-19 Vaccination Recommendations for 2024-2025 in Korea.

Beom Park W, Hwang Y, Kwon K, Noh J, Park S, Song J Infect Chemother. 2025; 56(4):453-460.

PMID: 39762924 PMC: 11704866. DOI: 10.3947/ic.2024.0142.


Humoral and cellular responses to a fifth bivalent SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases on tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: a prospective cohort study.

Orbo H, de Matos Kasahara T, Wolf A, Bjorlykke K, Sexton J, Jyssum I Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024; 48:101121.

PMID: 39624496 PMC: 11609505. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101121.


Scientific and Regulatory Lessons Learnt on Building a Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) Package for COVID-19 Variant Vaccine Updates in the EU-A Regulator's Perspective.

Shivji R, Grabski E, Jekerle V Vaccines (Basel). 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 39591137 PMC: 11598271. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12111234.


References
1.
Lau J, Cheng S, Leung K, Lee C, Hachim A, Tsang L . Real-world COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the Omicron BA.2 variant in a SARS-CoV-2 infection-naive population. Nat Med. 2023; 29(2):348-357. PMC: 9941049. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02219-5. View

2.
Muhsen K, Maimon N, Mizrahi A, Boltyansky B, Bodenheimer O, Diamant Z . Association of Receipt of the Fourth BNT162b2 Dose With Omicron Infection and COVID-19 Hospitalizations Among Residents of Long-term Care Facilities. JAMA Intern Med. 2022; 182(8):859-867. PMC: 9227688. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.2658. View

3.
Bar-On Y, Goldberg Y, Mandel M, Bodenheimer O, Amir O, Freedman L . Protection by a Fourth Dose of BNT162b2 against Omicron in Israel. N Engl J Med. 2022; 386(18):1712-1720. PMC: 9006780. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2201570. View

4.
Barda N, Dagan N, Cohen C, Hernan M, Lipsitch M, Kohane I . Effectiveness of a third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for preventing severe outcomes in Israel: an observational study. Lancet. 2021; 398(10316):2093-2100. PMC: 8555967. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02249-2. View

5.
Lyke K, Atmar R, Dominguez Islas C, Posavad C, Szydlo D, Paul Chourdhury R . Rapid decline in vaccine-boosted neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. Cell Rep Med. 2022; 3(7):100679. PMC: 9212999. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100679. View