Effectiveness of MRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters Against Infection, Hospitalization, and Death: A Target Trial Emulation in the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant Era
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The effectiveness of a third mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose (booster dose) against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant is uncertain, especially in older, high-risk populations.
Objective: To determine mRNA booster vaccine effectiveness (VE) against SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, and death in the Omicron era by booster type, primary vaccine type, time since primary vaccination, age, and comorbidity burden.
Design: Retrospective matched cohort study designed to emulate a target trial of booster vaccination versus no booster, conducted from 1 December 2021 to 31 March 2022.
Setting: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs health care system.
Participants: Persons who had received 2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses at least 5 months earlier.
Intervention: Booster monovalent mRNA vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech's BNT162b2 or Moderna's mRNA-1273) versus no booster.
Measurements: Booster VE.
Results: Each group included 490 838 well-matched persons, who were predominantly male (88%), had a mean age of 63.0 years (SD, 14.0), and were followed for up to 121 days (mean, 79.8 days). Booster VE more than 10 days after a booster dose was 42.3% (95% CI, 40.6% to 43.9%) against SARS-CoV-2 infection, 53.3% (CI, 48.1% to 58.0%) against SARS-CoV-2-related hospitalization, and 79.1% (CI, 71.2% to 84.9%) against SARS-CoV-2-related death. Booster VE was similar for different booster types (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273), age groups, and primary vaccination regimens but was significantly higher with longer time since primary vaccination and higher comorbidity burden.
Limitation: Predominantly male population.
Conclusion: Booster mRNA vaccination was highly effective in preventing death and moderately effective in preventing infection and hospitalization for up to 4 months after administration in the Omicron era. Increased uptake of booster vaccination, which is currently suboptimal, should be pursued to limit the morbidity and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially in persons with high comorbidity burden.
Primary Funding Source: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
Biases in COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness studies using cohort design.
Agampodi S, Tadesse B, Sahastrabuddhe S, Excler J, Kim J Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1474045.
PMID: 39540039 PMC: 11557388. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1474045.
Mostafavi F, Bahardoust M, Sera F, Amirabadizadeh A, Allahyari S, Ssentongod P J Res Health Sci. 2024; 24(4):e00626.
PMID: 39431651 PMC: 11492529. DOI: 10.34172/jrhs.2024.161.
Aiello A, Ruggieri S, Navarra A, Tortorella C, Vanini V, Haggiag S Vaccines (Basel). 2024; 12(8).
PMID: 39204049 PMC: 11359508. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12080926.
Factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy after stroke: a cross-sectional study.
Hu P, Zhu Y, Bai C, Wang W, Li D, Cao L BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1401.
PMID: 38797861 PMC: 11129457. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18922-y.
Lower prevalence of post-Covid-19 Condition following Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection.
de Bruijn S, van Hoek A, Mutubuki E, Knoop H, Slootweg J, Tulen A Heliyon. 2024; 10(7):e28941.
PMID: 38617937 PMC: 11015416. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28941.