» Articles » PMID: 37490133

Posterior Wall Thickness of the Confluent Inferior Pulmonary Veins Measured by Left Atrial Intracardiac Echocardiography: Implications for Catheter Ablation

Abstract

Background: Confluent inferior pulmonary veins (CIPV) is a rare anatomical variant. There is few evidence in the literature regarding anatomic landmarks consideration to guide radiofrequency application in avoiding complications in the esophagus in CIPV cases.

Methods: Of 986 consecutive patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation from July 2020 to June 2022, seven (0.7%) had CIPV with a common trunk connecting to the LA diagnosed by 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) performed from the left atrium (LA), we measured the posterior wall thickness (PWT) of the CIPV adjacent to the esophagus and compared the measurement with the LA posterior wall thickness (LAPWT) at the left inferior PV level of 25 controls without CIPV. For ablation in CIPV patients, each superior PV was individually isolated, and box isolation of CIPV without ablating the CIPV posterior wall was added (tri-circle ablation technique).

Results: The CIPV PWT was 0.7 ± 0.1 mm, while non-CIPV LAPWT was 2.0 ± 0.4 mm (P < 0.001). In the CIPV group, upper and lower portions of the CIPV were both apart from the esophagus (mean distances, 6.7 ± 3.4 mm and 7.9 ± 2.7 mm, respectively). Individual superior PV isolation and box CIPV isolation resulted in complete isolation of all PVs, with no complications. All CIPV patients except one remained AF recurrence-free for 376 ± 52 days.

Conclusions: Although CIPV frequency is low, CIPV PWT is very thin and special care is needed during ablation. A "tri-circle" ablation strategy avoids ablating in the thinnest portion of the posterior wall. Further studies are warranted to assess the safety.

Citing Articles

A catheter ablation case of confluent inferior and left superior pulmonary veins: a rare pulmonary vein variation.

Tanaka Y, Yamaki M, Igarashi Y J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39827434 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-025-01988-y.

References
1.
Whitaker J, Rajani R, Chubb H, Gabrawi M, Varela M, Wright M . The role of myocardial wall thickness in atrial arrhythmogenesis. Europace. 2016; 18(12):1758-1772. PMC: 5841556. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw014. View

2.
Mittal A, Fitzpatrick N, Szeplaki G . Pulsed field ablation in common inferior pulmonary trunk. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022; 66(4):809-810. PMC: 10172262. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-022-01412-9. View

3.
Kimura M, Sasaki S, Owada S, Horiuchi D, Sasaki K, Itoh T . Validation of accuracy of three-dimensional left atrial CartoSound™ and CT image integration: influence of respiratory phase and cardiac cycle. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013; 24(9):1002-7. DOI: 10.1111/jce.12170. View

4.
Gianni C, Della Rocca D, MacDonald B, Mohanty S, Mayedo A, Sahore Salwan A . Prevention, diagnosis, and management of atrioesophageal fistula. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020; 43(7):640-645. DOI: 10.1111/pace.13938. View

5.
Kanda Y . Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012; 48(3):452-8. PMC: 3590441. DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244. View